Source: Mueller pushed for Gates' help on collusion
Source: CNN
(CNN)Special counsel Robert Mueller's team last year made clear it wanted former Trump campaign deputy Rick Gates' help, not so much against his former business partner Paul Manafort, but with its central mission: investigating the Trump campaign's contact with the Russians. New information disclosed in court filings and to CNN this week begin to show how they're getting it.
In a court filing earlier this week, the public saw the first signs of how the Mueller team plans to use information from Gates to tie Manafort, the former Trump campaign chairman, directly to a Russian intelligence agency. Mueller's team alleges that Gates was in contact with a close colleague of Manafort's who worked for a Russian intelligence agency -- and that Gates knew of the spy service ties in September and October 2016, while he worked on the Trump campaign. Gates would have to talk about the communication with the man if prosecutors wanted, according to his plea deal.
That's in line with what prosecutors told Gates months ago during high-stakes negotiations, CNN has learned. They told him they didn't need his cooperation against Manafort, according to a person familiar with the investigation, and instead wanted to hear what he knew about contact between the Trump campaign and Russians.
The extent of Gates' knowledge about any such contact or what he told prosecutors hasn't been made public.
As part of Gates' agreement to cooperate with the special counsel a month ago, he earned a vastly reduced potential sentence and had several charges dropped in two criminal cases against him.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/29/politics/mueller-gates-russia-investigation-contacts/index.html?adkey=bn
Fiendish Thingy
(15,361 posts)That would be a powerful incentive for Gates to cooperate, to avoid an espionage charge.
Manafort is likely screwed, espionage charge or not.
pnwmom
(108,925 posts)(Which might happen someday, but maybe not yet.) But there are plenty of other serious charges they could be convicted of.
getagrip_already
(14,225 posts)Espionage does not require a state of war. Neither does sedition. Treason does however.