Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed May 2, 2018, 01:07 PM May 2018

Tom Price Backpedals: O'Care Mandate Repeal 'Exactly The Right Thing To Do'

Source: Talking Points Memo




By Matt Shuham | May 2, 2018 12:59 pm

Former Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Price contradicted himself again on Wednesday, reversing his comment the previous day that the eliminating the penalties associated with Obamacare’s individual mandate “will harm the pool in the [insurance] exchange market.”

“Repealing the individual mandate was exactly the right thing to do,” Price said in a statement to Politico Wednesday. “Forcing Americans to buy something they don’t want undermines individual liberty as well as free markets.”

“The only fair and effective way to bring down health care costs is to allow markets to create more choices for consumers and small businesses,” his statement continued.

It was a turn back to conservative orthodoxy, given that congressional Republicans eliminated the penalty for not having health coverage (or else receiving a waiver) as part of their tax bill last year. The change will take effect in 2019.



Read more: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/tom-price-backpedals-ocare-mandate-repeal-exactly-the-right-thing-to-do

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tom Price Backpedals: O'Care Mandate Repeal 'Exactly The Right Thing To Do' (Original Post) DonViejo May 2018 OP
I'll go for it Cold War Spook May 2018 #1
Looks like he and Rubio have been yanked back to the GOP heel BumRushDaShow May 2018 #2
More choices - yes, and affordable too, like all the junk insurance we had in the individual progree May 2018 #3

progree

(10,901 posts)
3. More choices - yes, and affordable too, like all the junk insurance we had in the individual
Wed May 2, 2018, 06:52 PM
May 2018

market prior to the ACA (and still do). Very affordable if you don't get cancer or have a serious accident.

And of course if you have pre-existing conditions, these affordable plans are not for you (because they won't let you buy one). Thus relatively healthy people end up in these plans, while less healthy people end up in the ACA, driving up its costs and premiums.

“The only fair and effective way to bring down health care costs is to allow markets to create more choices for consumers and small businesses,” his statement continued.


Here's an example of the kind of choices we'll get:

Healthcare sharing ministries: 5 things to know
These alternatives to regular health insurance have grown to nearly 1 million people this decade.
https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/healthcare-sharing-ministries-5-things-to-know/521229/

HCSMs don’t promise to pay claims. There are also limits on what’s covered, including pre-existing condition exclusions, she said.

... The plans don’t have the consumer protections found in the ACA, including out-of-pocket limits, pre-existing condition provisions and requiring coverage of the 10 essential health benefits.

... “HCSM coverage leaves members at risk of substantial out-of-pocket costs for conditions either not covered or covered only up to a cap. Moreover, because HCSMs do not promise that members’ care costs will be paid and are not subject to rules designed to ensure sufficient funds to cover claims, members face a greater risk that even eligible spending will not be reimbursed,” according to the report.

More...



There's A Christian Alternative To Obamacare. But There's A Catch., Huffington Post, 3/9/18
https://www.yahoo.com/news/apos-christian-alternative-obamacare-apos-221607081.html

The Lammers understood they were not buying a traditional insurance product. The company literature made clear the couple was ultimately responsible for their own bills, and that Medi-Share had limits and offered no guarantees of payment. Still, after listening to their friends in Medi-Share talk about their experiences and after speaking with the company’s representatives the Lammers came to believe

Medi-Share would take care of their expenses just as well as the company plan they had from Danielle’s old employer.

But Medi-Share doesn’t operate in the way that an employer plan would. After reviewing her records, it determined the tumor was actually a pre-existing condition because, Medi-Share explained in a letter, Danielle had mentioned the bump to her family doctor once before, roughly three years earlier. That made it ineligible for treatment under the ministry’s guidelines.

More...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Tom Price Backpedals: O'C...