Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
Sat May 5, 2018, 10:45 PM May 2018

Judge rejects Mueller's request for delay in Russian troll farm case

Source: Politico

A federal judge has rejected special counsel Robert Mueller’s request to delay the first court hearing in a criminal case charging three Russian companies and 13 Russian citizens with using social media and other means to foment strife among Americans in advance of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

In a brief order Saturday evening, U.S. District Court Judge Dabney Friedrich offered no explanation for her decision to deny a request prosecutors made Friday to put off the scheduled Wednesday arraignment for Concord Management and Consulting, one of the three firms charged in the case.

The 13 people charged in the high-profile indictment in February are considered unlikely to ever appear in a U.S. court. The three businesses accused of facilitating the alleged Russian troll farm operation — the Internet Research Agency, Concord Management, and Concord Catering — were also expected to simply ignore the American criminal proceedings.

Last month, however, a pair of Washington-area lawyers suddenly surfaced in the case, notifying the court that they represent Concord Management. POLITICO reported at the time that the move appeared to be a bid to force Mueller’s team to turn over relevant evidence to the Russian firm and perhaps even to bait prosecutors into an embarrassing dismissal in order to avoid disclosing sensitive information.

Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/04/mueller-russia-interference-election-case-delay-570627



Judge is appointed by Trump.
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
4. This has had me worried.
Sat May 5, 2018, 11:22 PM
May 2018

The accelerating corruption of perhaps the only defense we have left.. the judiciary.

CrispyQ

(36,425 posts)
14. McConnell recently bragged that he's making "generational changes" to the judiciary.
Sun May 6, 2018, 02:27 PM
May 2018

Where is the MSM on this? That's right. They've been busy defending Sarah Huckabee Sanders from an attack on her eye makeup.

Grassy Knoll

(10,118 posts)
5. The Judge Should Recuse Himself For Being A Trump Appointee...
Sat May 5, 2018, 11:43 PM
May 2018

,,,This Should Be An Outrage, But Sadly Congress Dems Won't Fight It, Sad. Tired Of This Shit.

Leghorn21

(13,523 posts)
8. Immaculate researcher SpicyFiles downloaded and posted documents, emails and letters
Sun May 6, 2018, 12:08 AM
May 2018

related to this case today. The documents are from the Pacer (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) website.

A small fraction of her post:

In which we find out on April 11, 2018, “counsel entered appearances on behalf of one of the defendants, Concord [Caterting]“ and the Special Counsel discloses:

“...counsel sent broad-ranging requests for information to the government. Counsel sought a bill of particulars, demanding 51 categories of information, including details about online platforms the government has discovered, individuals believed to have been involved in charged and uncharged activity, and names of potential witnesses.”

requested discovery, including of all statements, recordings, or electronic surveillance of Concord officers and employees,

Attachment B, at 1-3, and, as “a predicate” to motions practice, information about more than 70 years of American foreign policy—“each and every instance” from “1945 to present” where the U.S. government “engaged in operations to interfere with elections and political processes in any foreign country,” (emphasis added)


All documents can be seen here:

https://maddogpac.com/blogs/spicy-files/internet-reseach-group-et-al-indictment-updated

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,967 posts)
11. Oh, Law not on defense side, facts neither, so they attack the prosecution with "What about" isms
Sun May 6, 2018, 12:35 AM
May 2018

Trying to drag the US through the mud because Putin is muddy.

RockRaven

(14,916 posts)
9. Even Trumpkins
Sun May 6, 2018, 12:29 AM
May 2018

don't know what Mueller knows (they only know their own pieces, not the whole puzzle), which is why they're desperate to know what Mueller has on those he's already charged -- to prepare/coordinate their bullshit to defend those not yet charged.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge rejects Mueller's r...