Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 10:21 AM Nov 2018

Pelosi: Whitaker's appointment to acting AG 'does violence to the Constitution'

Source: The Hill



BY TAL AXELROD - 11/10/18 08:35 AM EST

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) ripped President Trump’s appointment of Matthew Whitaker as acting attorney general, saying in a new interview that his appointment “does violence to the Constitution.”

"It does violence to the Constitution and the vision of our founders to appoint such a person in such a manner to be the chief legal officer in our country. And that's bipartisan," Pelosi told CBS News's Margaret Brennan in an interview set to air Sunday on “Face the Nation.”

Trump tapped Whitaker to lead the Justice Department after Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Wednesday that he was resigning at the president's request. Whitaker had served as Sessions’s chief of staff since September of last year.

Shortly after Sessions's ouster, Trump also announced that Whitaker would oversee special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had supervised Mueller's probe since Sessions recused himself last year.

Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/416050-pelosi-whitakers-appointment-to-acting-ag-does-violence-to-the-constitution

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pelosi: Whitaker's appointment to acting AG 'does violence to the Constitution' (Original Post) DonViejo Nov 2018 OP
Yep... Zoonart Nov 2018 #1
Hahahahahah FarPoint Nov 2018 #6
We know that. Now let's figure out what we will do to stop him. Autumn Nov 2018 #2
I sense... FarPoint Nov 2018 #7
If the appointment is illegal, why don't KPN Nov 2018 #12
I read that it only takes one Democrat. What's the hold up? Autumn Nov 2018 #13
Yes, water is wet. Now, what are you going to do? nt jrthin Nov 2018 #3
Relax. Pelosi has got this. This is just an opening salvo. You can bet there is a great deal going Nitram Nov 2018 #8
Can't Orange Deplorable treestar Nov 2018 #4
He was appointed without confirmation BumRushDaShow Nov 2018 #9
Go Nancy DownriverDem Nov 2018 #5
Even here, the Pelosi critics are aggressive. NBachers Nov 2018 #10
Keep Nancy.. Maxheader Nov 2018 #11
Resist on all fronts until evil is defeated. ffr Nov 2018 #14
Trumpy don't care. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2018 #15
DOJ will not tolerate Whitaker Linda Ed Nov 2018 #16

Autumn

(45,032 posts)
2. We know that. Now let's figure out what we will do to stop him.
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 10:26 AM
Nov 2018

I'm thinking an investigation into him? Televised.

FarPoint

(12,309 posts)
7. I sense...
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 11:26 AM
Nov 2018

Whitaker has been on the Mueller/FBI radar since day 1 when he was assigned to Session's Office by Trump.,,,

Nitram

(22,776 posts)
8. Relax. Pelosi has got this. This is just an opening salvo. You can bet there is a great deal going
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 11:46 AM
Nov 2018

on behind the scenes.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
4. Can't Orange Deplorable
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 10:31 AM
Nov 2018

Just nominate him? He fires a cabinet member. He has to nominate a replacement.

BumRushDaShow

(128,735 posts)
9. He was appointed without confirmation
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 11:59 AM
Nov 2018

and has apparently already settled in. He needs to be removed and one of the other deputies/assistants who were already confirmed to their lesser positions, needs to be permitted to be "acting" until a formal nomination is made, goes through confirmation hearings, and is voted on. His current position as Chief of Staff" for Sessions prior to Sessions resigning, was not something that required a Senate confirmation.

The ridiculous argument that is being made by the current administration is that "he was already confirmed" - basing that on when he had been a U.S. Attorney under Shrub. But what they fail to realize is that when he was illegally appointed into this "acting" position, he was NOT currently working in the position or capacity of a U.S. Attorney, having resigned that position after Obama took office and his replacement was confirmed, so he has to start all over.

Linda Ed

(493 posts)
16. DOJ will not tolerate Whitaker
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 09:41 PM
Nov 2018

Maybe just maybe,,,DOJ attorney's will walk out and not tolerate this Whitaker in this position ..?? Who knows could happen

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pelosi: Whitaker's appoin...