White House: Trump has 'broad discretion' to regulate journalists' access
Source: Politico
The White House said in response to a lawsuit by CNN that correspondent Jim Acosta's press pass was revoked because of conduct that 'disrupts press events.'
By MATTHEW CHOI 11/14/2018 11:22 AM EST Updated 11/14/2018 12:11 PM EST
The White House on Wednesday said President Donald Trump has "broad discretion" to regulate journalists' access, arguing in its formal response to a lawsuit by CNN that correspondent Jim Acosta's press pass was revoked because of conduct that "disrupts press events."
"The President and White House possess the same broad discretion to regulate access to the White House for journalists (and other members of the public) that they possess to select which journalists receive interviews, or which journalists they acknowledge at press conferences," the White House said in a legal filing Wednesday.
"No journalist has a First Amendment right to enter the White House," the White House said.
CNN filed a lawsuit Tuesday asking a judge to restore Acosta's credentials and declare that the administration's decision to yank them last week was unconstitutional. The White House pulled the reporter's access after he repeatedly tried to ask Trump questions at a press conference, even after the president tried to dismiss him, and briefly refused to let a White House aide pull a microphone out of his hand.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/14/white-house-trump-has-broad-discretion-to-regulate-journalists-access-989916
47of74
(18,470 posts)We would never hear the end from fuck face and his groupies about how Mrs. Clinton was violating 1A rights of Faux "News" and its "journalists" from every fuck stick on Earth.
olegramps
(8,200 posts)He couldn't have done more to awaken the nation to illegal attempts to silence the mainstay of democracy. The free press. As Jefferson said if he had to chose between a government and no free press and no government and a free press that he would without question chose the latter. There is nothing more characteristic of a dictatorship than their determination to silence the free press. It is paramount for the operation of a totalitarian government. Only the most partisan of today' political hacks are smart enough not to attempt to justify what Trump has done.
SWBTATTReg
(22,112 posts)RockRaven
(14,959 posts)by a Democratic president in 2021 who will cite this precedent.
FOXNews's amicus brief is one thing, but Trump won't read or see it. They ought to be hammering him on air, just out of self-preservation.
True Blue American
(17,984 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)The GOP knows a Dem president wouldn't pull that shit.
mastermind
(229 posts)zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)We saw this with the muslim ban. The lower courts were more than willing to consider WHY the ban was instituted. The SC seemed more concerned with whether the authority existed, DESPITE, the motivation. Same thing here. Does the White House have the authority to control access. This SC will probably say "yes". They won't care if it is to undermine the 1st amendment.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Thirteen news organizations including Fox News, NBC and POLITICO announced Wednesday they would file amicus briefs supporting CNN's lawsuit.
"It is imperative that independent journalists have access to the President and his activities, and that journalists are not barred for arbitrary reasons. Our news organizations support the fundamental constitutional right to question this President, or any President," a joint statement from the news organizations said.
The judge presiding over the case, Timothy Kelly, is a Trump appointee and set a hearing for Wednesday afternoon.
DBoon
(22,357 posts).. would they have broad discretion over other access to Executive branch functions - regulatory agencies, etc.
If so, this could be very bad
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,412 posts)Fox News backs CNN in lawsuit against Trump White House
Fox News is supporting CNN's lawsuit against the Trump administration over the White House's revocation of Jim Acosta's press pass and plans to file an amicus brief in the case, according to a statement from the network's president Jay Wallace.
"FOX News supports CNN in its legal effort to regain its White House reporters press credential. We intend to file an amicus brief with the U.S. District Court. Secret Service passes for working White House journalists should never be weaponized. While we dont condone the growing antagonistic tone by both the President and the press at recent media avails, we do support a free press, access and open exchanges for the American people."
Twelve other news organizations also announced they would be joining Fox in filing an amicus brief in support of CNN.
AP
Bloomberg
First Look Media
Gannett
National Press Club
NBC News
New York Times
POLITICO
Press Freedom Defense Fund
EW Scripps
USA Today Network
Washington Post
Go deeper: Legal experts back CNN's case against Trump over press credentials
New:: The AP; Bloomberg; First Look; Fox News; Gannett; National Press Club; NBC News; The New York Times; Politico; Press Freedom Defense Fund; E.W. Scripps; USA Today; and The Washington Post have filed joint friend-of-the-court briefs to support CNNs and Jim Acostas lawsuit.
Link to tweet
Link to Fox News. If you don't like it, don't open it:
Fox News stands with CNN: Passes for working White House journalists should never be weaponized
WhatCouldGoWrongHat Retweeted
NEW:
@FoxNews
to file Amicus brief in support of
@CNN
s lawsuit vs. White House Per Fox News President
@jayawallace
.
Link to tweet
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,922 posts)I'm going to love seeing the dotard slapped down.