Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,846 posts)
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 02:21 PM Nov 2018

The number of abortions in the U.S. hits a historic low

Source: Washington Post

By Ariana Eunjung Cha November 21 at 1:17 PM

Fewer U.S. women are having abortions today than at any time since Roe v. Wade, according to new government figures released Wednesday.

In 2015, a total of 638,169 abortions were reported, a decrease of two percent from 652,639 abortions in 2014. The abortion rate was 11.8 abortions per 1,000 women in 2015 compared with 12.1 in 2014 and 15.9 in 2006.

In the years immediately after abortion was legalized nationwide in 1973, the number of legal abortions rose dramatically, reaching its peak in the 1980s. Abortions then began dropping at a slow rate until around 2006 to 2008, when they increased slightly, followed by even greater decreases in recent years.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance report comes at a heated time for abortion politics in the country, with Trump Administration officials introducing new policies to reduce funding to abortion providers and state legislatures debating ever more restrictive laws on abortion. Just this week, a federal court in Mississippi blocked the state’s ban against abortions past 15 weeks gestation. In signing the bill into law, Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant (R) had said he hoped to make the state the “safest place in America for an unborn child.”

-snip-


Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2018/11/21/number-abortions-us-hits-historic-low/

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The number of abortions in the U.S. hits a historic low (Original Post) Eugene Nov 2018 OP
Because of increase in birth rates or increase in birth control/contraceptive use and coverage? Freethinker65 Nov 2018 #1
I would think the latter. OnlinePoker Nov 2018 #2
And it is too expensive to have kids bronxiteforever Nov 2018 #3
Yep, birth control is far cheaper. OnlinePoker Nov 2018 #6
Novel approach! Unlikely here in Trump world however. bronxiteforever Nov 2018 #8
According to the article, both plus lamsmy Nov 2018 #4
But we all know if they make abortion illegal birth control is next on the agenda GulfCoast66 Nov 2018 #14
Birth Control still_one Nov 2018 #15
Also this birth rate has fallen bronxiteforever Nov 2018 #5
It would also be interesting to see a geographic breakdown matt819 Nov 2018 #7
The number of REGISTERED abortions is down sandensea Nov 2018 #9
Abortion's down because pregnancy's down SpankMe Nov 2018 #10
And Delphinus Nov 2018 #11
It is likely a combination of factors. BigmanPigman Nov 2018 #12
The younger generations are having much less sex forthemiddle Nov 2018 #13

OnlinePoker

(5,719 posts)
2. I would think the latter.
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 02:46 PM
Nov 2018

Fertility rate has been dropping steadily since 2007 and in 2015 was down to 1.844 children per woman. It wasn't this low since 1986. In 2016, it dropped even further to 1.8 children per woman, less than half what it was in 1960.

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN?locations=US

bronxiteforever

(9,287 posts)
3. And it is too expensive to have kids
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 02:53 PM
Nov 2018

Daycare costs plus enormous student loans face the next generation of potential young parents. Try to buy a house and keep 2 cars on that scenario.

OnlinePoker

(5,719 posts)
6. Yep, birth control is far cheaper.
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 02:58 PM
Nov 2018

Here in BC, they're experimenting with $10-a-day daycare for pre-schoolers. The pilot program is funded to March 2020 at $60 million for 2500 kids. That's $24,000 per child. If they wanted to expand it province wide, it would cost over $4 Billion. But the government says they would get a lot of that back with increased employment as stay-at-home parents enter the job market and those that have been working would have much more to spend in the economy rather than giving it all to daycare providers.

lamsmy

(155 posts)
4. According to the article, both plus
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 02:54 PM
Nov 2018

Plus medical abortions or pills such as RU-486, meaning women don't have to undergo an invasive procedure to end a pregnancy.

But not included in this article: Since 1993 teenage pregnancies have been reduced by 66%. The number of abortions has gone down by 70% (per 1000 of population.) The two absolutely go hand in hand.

If right to life people were serious about reducing abortion, they would be demanding increased access to birth control for young people.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
14. But we all know if they make abortion illegal birth control is next on the agenda
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 09:33 PM
Nov 2018

Because their real goal is putting women back where they want them. Under the control of a man.

matt819

(10,749 posts)
7. It would also be interesting to see a geographic breakdown
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 03:00 PM
Nov 2018

To see what the impacts have been the rates of abortion in the more extreme states. Perhaps by seeing increases in nearby states.

IOW, the raw data is interesting, but the analysis is crucial.

sandensea

(21,620 posts)
9. The number of REGISTERED abortions is down
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 03:05 PM
Nov 2018

But the unregistered, back-alley kind is probably skyrocketing.

This is why maternal mortality rates have doubled in the last 20 years: GOPee governors who've made safe, legal abortions practically inaccesible just to score political points with the Kim Davis vote.

SpankMe

(2,957 posts)
10. Abortion's down because pregnancy's down
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 03:08 PM
Nov 2018

Pregnancy's down because people don't want to bring kids into the world of Trump.

BigmanPigman

(51,583 posts)
12. It is likely a combination of factors.
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 05:45 PM
Nov 2018

Of course a real study would be useful but our current GOP admin doesn't support either Science or Women (those who want rights and equality) so the answers won't be "discovered" due to NO funding on this "unimportant" issue.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The number of abortions i...