More American children are uninsured despite strong economy
Source: CNN
By Tami Luhby, CNN
Updated 12:01 AM ET, Thu November 29, 2018
New York (CNN) - For the first time in nearly a decade, the number of uninsured children in America has grown.
The reversal is unprecedented, particularly given a strong economy in which more people are landing jobs and gaining access to employer health coverage. It also comes at a time when the nation's overall uninsured rate remained flat.
Roughly 276,000 more children were uninsured in 2017 than the year before, bringing the total to more than 3.9 million, according to a report released Thursday by Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. Some 5% of those 18 and under had no health insurance, up from 4.7% a year earlier.
"With an improving economy and a very low unemployment rate, the fact that our nation is going backwards on children's health coverage is very troubling," said Joan Alker, the center's executive director. "Without serious efforts to get back on track, the decline in coverage is likely to continue in 2018 and may in fact get worse for America's children."
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/29/politics/uninsured-children-rate/index.html
Roy Rolling
(6,911 posts)The GOP and especially Trump think Third World status is three times better than those elite, first-world countries.
ck4829
(35,042 posts)CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)Pile of pure B.S. is it not?
Time to DUMP TRUMP!
still_one
(92,115 posts)due to these assholes?
I suspect there are other groups that also aren't included in these statistics who don't have health insurance.
but hey, they can take their excellent "tax breaks", and buy their catastrophic health insurance which doesn't cover sqwat
BigmanPigman
(51,582 posts)LakeSuperiorView
(1,533 posts)Is it better than a Chinese made stuffed animal with 39 star flag shoved up it's ass?
MiniMe
(21,714 posts)I thought that was supposed to fix Childrens health care?
mastermind
(229 posts)trickle down economics will never improve the peoples economy, its all smoke and mirrors. Nothing good will happen, only fattened swiss bank accounts.
Zing Zing Zingbah
(6,496 posts)Here's a few extra pennies basically. It's not showering down or pouring down on us. The language implies we get the scraps, if anything.
haele
(12,645 posts)"Oh, they had couple good years, so we'll just pull back their funding..."
- because a couple years where there was a "baby bust", sheer "good luck" when it came to injuries, there was no major pandemic with attendant health complications (i.e., encephalitis), or because more people had employer-provided family health care for a short time means that it's always going to be that way.
"Taxpayers shouldn't be covering/can't afford to cover the children of non-Americans..."
- because the administration just wants to be mean to "brown" families, no matter if the families are here legally, or if the children were native-born citizens or not.
"Medicaid can cover kids."
- even though Medicaid may or may not be expanded in that state because of sheer meanness, and many states have income or work restrictions to be able to participate, even for working families with a household income around the U.S. median.
"ACA can cover kids..."
- even though the promise of the ACA has been cut and neutered by the GOP for nearly a decade to be nearly unaffordable for anyone making just below the median wage without some serious subsidies because it's a "Democratic" program.
Haele
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)Maxheader
(4,371 posts)stumpy, the yellow haired dogs attempts to destroy the aca...
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Zing Zing Zingbah
(6,496 posts)Regular working people with families aren't benefiting from it. The rich people are. People are working, but they don't have good benefits and many have difficulty paying for what they need still.