Michael Cohen: THE GOVERNMENT'S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM
Source: Courtlistener.com
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Defendant Michael Cohen is scheduled to be sentenced on December 12, 2018. The United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (the Office) respectfully submits this memorandum in connection with that sentencing and in response to the defendant's sentencing memorandum dated November 30, 2018 (Def. Mem.).
Cohen, an attorney and businessman, committed four distinct federal crimes over a period of several years. He was motivated to do so by personal greed, and repeatedly used his power and influence for deceptive ends. Now he seeks extraordinary leniency - a sentence of no jail time - based principally on his rose-colored view of the seriousness of the crimes; his claims to a sympathetic personal history; and his provision of certain information to law enforcement. But the crimes committed by Cohen were more serious than his submission allows and were marked by a pattern of deception that permeated his professional life (and was evidently hidden from the friends and family members who wrote on his behalf).
Read more: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.499666/gov.uscourts.nysd.499666.27.0_2.pdf
Link to tweet
BREAKING: Prosecutors say ex-Trump lawyer Michael Cohen deserves substantial prison time, despite his cooperation.
ON MSNBC, Chuck Rosenberg says that this document from SDNY, rather than any input from the Mueller team, will be what "drives sentencing."
Qutzupalotl
(14,302 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)The other one is due to be released any minute now, too.
George II
(67,782 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,282 posts)when they have the sentencing hearing. Just to show what kind of vicious bastard they are dealing with. This man is a danger and should be locked up for a long, long time.
still_one
(92,155 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)head (or junior or jarad's) head on a platter to get no jail time.
still_one
(92,155 posts)pnwmom
(108,977 posts)when it was most useful. Cohen delayed and was much less forthcoming.
Gore1FL
(21,128 posts)https://washingtonmonthly.com/2018/12/05/why-the-flynn-sentencing-memo-could-be-bad-news-for-jared-kushner/
Technically, they could have landed at 0 days in prison before he cooperated. It's difficult to make the sentence harsher for someone who cooperated from almost square 1.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)that Mueller said they will NOT be filing any sort of memo that shows that Cohen cooperated enough to merit a reduced sentence.
onenote
(42,700 posts)Haven't seen Mueller's separate memo but it probably will largely agree with the SDNY recommendation.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)LakeSuperiorView
(1,533 posts)When it's chasing bullshit charges, the taxpayers wind up footing the bill.
More_Cowbell
(2,191 posts)H2O Man
(73,536 posts)Intense.
Snellius
(6,881 posts)No way he'll take the wrap without pointing to the Don.
BigmanPigman
(51,584 posts)Rev. Sharpton spoke with Cohen and said that he expected this sentence. Christmas is early! Now if they can get Pence...... President Pelosi!
red dog 1
(27,792 posts)regardless of how "substantial" it is.
The question is...will he?
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)UpInArms
(51,282 posts)From the document in the OP
While Cohens provision of information to the SCO merits credit, his description of his actions as arising solely from some personal resolve as opposed to arising from the pendency of criminal charges and the desire for leniency ignores that Cohen first reached out to meet with the SCO at a time when he knew he was under imminent threat of indictment in this District. As such, any suggestion by Cohen that his meetings with law enforcement reflect a selfless and unprompted about-face are overstated.
With respect to Cohens provision of information to this Office, in its two meetings with him, this Office assessed Cohen to be forthright and credible, and the information he provided was largely consistent with other evidence gathered. Had Cohen actually cooperated, it could have been fruitful: He did provide what could have been useful information about matters relating to ongoing investigations being carried out by this Office. But as Cohen partially acknowledges, it was his decision not to pursue full cooperation, and his professed willingness to continue to provide
information at some later unspecified time is of limited value to this Office, both because he is under no obligation to do so, and because the Offices inability to fully vet his criminal history and reliability impact his utility as a witness.