Ethics officials said Whitaker should recuse from the Mueller probe
Source: Washington Post
A senior Justice Department ethics official concluded acting attorney general Matthew G. Whitaker should recuse from overseeing special counsel Robert S. Mueller III's probe examining President Trump, but advisers to Whitaker recommended the opposite and he has no plans to step aside, according to people familiar with the matter.
The latest account of what happened underscores the high stakes and deep distrust -- within Congress and in some corners of the Justice Department -- surrounding Whitaker's appointment to become the nation's top law enforcement official until the Senate votes on the nomination of William P. Barr to take the job. Earlier in the day, a different official, who spoke on the condition they not be named, said ethics officials had advised Whitaker need not step aside, only to walk back that account hours later.
Within days of the president's announcement in early November that he had put Whitaker in the job on a temporary basis, Whitaker tapped a veteran U.S. attorney to become part of a four-person team of advisers on his new job, including the question of whether he should recuse from Mueller's investigation because of his past statements regarding that probe, and his friendship with one of its witnesses, according to a senior Justice Department official.
Whitaker never asked Justice Department ethics officials for a recommendation, nor did he receive a formal recommendation, this official said. However, after Whitaker met repeatedly with ethics officials to discuss the facts and the issues under consideration, a senior ethics official told the group of advisers on Tuesday that it was a "close call," but Whitaker should recuse to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest, the official said. Whitaker was not present at that meeting, the official said. Those four advisers, however, disagreed with the ethics determination, and recommended to Whitaker the next day not to recuse, saying there was no precedent for doing so, and doing so now could create a bad precedent for future attorneys general.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/ethics-officials-say-whitaker-need-not-recuse-from-supervising-special-counsel-probe-according-to-a-person-familiar-with-the-matter/2018/12/20/76332392-046b-11e9-b5df-5d3874f1ac36_story.html
Full title: Ethics officials said Whitaker should recuse from the Mueller probe, but his advisers told him not to, officials say
This is a reversal of the earlier reports that Ethics officials had indicated no recusal was needed.
CincyDem
(6,351 posts)...then he gets a group of "advisers" (which could include Sean Hannity for all we know) and they say "forget about what the pros tell you, just do this".
Sheesh, 1/3/19 can't come fast enough.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,922 posts)Sleazy con men who think they know more than everyone else.
lancelyons
(988 posts)So earlier on multiple media outlets they said DOJ ethics said he doesnt need to recuse.
now we find out that this was just another freking lie.
BumRushDaShow
(128,855 posts)(many of us suspected that though because that's not how Ethics folks work - I am sure Richard Painter probably levitated after hearing the initial story )
bluestarone
(16,906 posts)Whole fucking bunch of lying bastards!!!!!
H2O Man
(73,536 posts)I was stunned when I heard the earlier report.
Recommended.