Accused fertility doc says law protects him from DNA test
Source: Associated Press
Updated 1:00 pm CST, Saturday, February 9, 2019
MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) The lawyer for a fertility doctor accused of using his own sperm to impregnate a woman in the 1970s says Vermont law forbids DNA paternity tests for sperm donors.
The Times Argus reports that a motion by the doctor's attorney contends the parentage law designed to protect sperm donors prevents them from being genetically tested to demonstrate paternity. The motion also contends state family courts, not federal courts, have jurisdiction over determining parentage.
A Florida couple sued retired Vermont Dr. John Coates on Dec. 4 in U.S. District Court.
The lawsuit says the couple discovered what had happened when their now-grown daughter sought information about her biological father through genetic testing databases such as Ancestry.com. They say they were stunned when the tests showed Coates was the father.
Read more: https://www.chron.com/news/us/article/Accused-fertility-doc-says-law-protects-him-from-13603875.php
(Short article, no more at link.)
iluvtennis
(19,833 posts)Odoreida
(1,549 posts)... the theory of evolution says his genes win.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,321 posts)... then the question is: can the doctor be a legitimate sperm donor in his own clinic?
If so, there's no problem. If not, then his DNA can be compelled for testing. Or so it seems.
winstars
(4,219 posts)An episode ripped from the headlines of FUTURE news stories???
TexasBushwhacker
(20,142 posts)allgood33
(1,584 posts)possible health issues for all involved.
LisaL
(44,972 posts)the sperm donor? He is saying sperm donors can't be tested but why would that apply to him if he wasn't supposed to have been a sperm donor?
rocktivity
(44,572 posts)Unless you had your patients' legal knowledge and consent to be their sperm donor, you were "just" supposed to be their DOCTOR, LOL
rocktivity