Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat Feb 23, 2019, 09:38 AM Feb 2019

Sen. Lisa Murkowski says she's likely to back Trump disapproval

Source: Anchorage Daily News



Author: Becky Bohrer, Associated Press clock Updated: 9 hours ago calendar Published 9 hours ago

JUNEAU — U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski said she is likely to support a resolution of disapproval over President Donald Trump’s declaration of a national emergency to secure more money for a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.

In an audio recording provided by an aide late Friday, Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, noted concerns she has raised about the precedent that could be set if the declaration stands.

House Democrats introduced a resolution Friday to block the national emergency declaration. If it passes the Democratic-controlled House, it would go to the Republican-held Senate. Trump on Friday promised a veto.

"I want to make sure that the resolution of disapproval is exactly what I think it is, because if it is as I understand it to be, I will likely be supporting the resolution to disapprove of the action," Murkowski said.

Read more: https://www.adn.com/politics/2019/02/23/sen-lisa-murkowski-says-shes-likely-to-back-trump-disapproval/

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sen. Lisa Murkowski says she's likely to back Trump disapproval (Original Post) DonViejo Feb 2019 OP
Wowee, you sure you want to do that Lisa? That's almost like taking an actual stand. Happyhippychick Feb 2019 #1
I'm inclined to believe her a bit more than Collins. We'll see how the vote totals go. Firestorm49 Feb 2019 #11
I would not believe her or any Repugnant after Kavanaugh as they are self serving in their voting cstanleytech Feb 2019 #13
Murkowski opposed Kavenaugh. Including on the final vote Tom Rinaldo Feb 2019 #14
She's a dying breed. A Republican who is only half-crazy Drahthaardogs Feb 2019 #15
I am willing to bet she only did that for the PR it gave her and if it had come down to them needing cstanleytech Feb 2019 #16
Damn right she better think about it. Trump will sell Alaska to Russia if Lisa ticks him off. Midnight Writer Feb 2019 #17
why would McConnel even allow a vote? He has no reason to.... beachbum bob Feb 2019 #2
Under the rules he cannot deny a vote on this issue. nt in2herbs Feb 2019 #5
He's required to. OliverQ Feb 2019 #6
Of course. It gives the illusion that she's bothered by this but doesn't actually do anything Clash City Rocker Feb 2019 #3
I still say, watoos Feb 2019 #4
Another one..."likely". Did she get permission from Susan Collins to say that? George II Feb 2019 #7
Probably, but True Blue American Feb 2019 #8
She's slightly more trustworthy than Collins Julian Englis Feb 2019 #9
Likely? Polly Hennessey Feb 2019 #10
"resolution of disapproval" wft?? Thought it was a vote to actually rescind the Kashkakat v.2.0 Feb 2019 #12

Happyhippychick

(8,379 posts)
1. Wowee, you sure you want to do that Lisa? That's almost like taking an actual stand.
Sat Feb 23, 2019, 09:39 AM
Feb 2019

You'd better think about it some more.

cstanleytech

(26,202 posts)
13. I would not believe her or any Repugnant after Kavanaugh as they are self serving in their voting
Sat Feb 23, 2019, 03:28 PM
Feb 2019

and the only reason they will vote against Trump is if they think not doing so will hurt them more down the road.
Otherwise if they think they will be ok they will give the middle finger followed by a shout of "Fuck You" to the American people and the Constitution.

cstanleytech

(26,202 posts)
16. I am willing to bet she only did that for the PR it gave her and if it had come down to them needing
Sat Feb 23, 2019, 06:56 PM
Feb 2019

her vote that she would have fallen in line and voted for him.

 

OliverQ

(3,363 posts)
6. He's required to.
Sat Feb 23, 2019, 10:22 AM
Feb 2019

The provisions in the NEA law require the Senate to hold a vote if the House passes a joint resolution.

Clash City Rocker

(3,385 posts)
3. Of course. It gives the illusion that she's bothered by this but doesn't actually do anything
Sat Feb 23, 2019, 09:58 AM
Feb 2019

Susan Collins will sign it too. They know it will get vetoed if it passes, so there’s no danger that they’ll accidentally do the right thing.

Polly Hennessey

(6,777 posts)
10. Likely?
Sat Feb 23, 2019, 10:54 AM
Feb 2019

Why is a simple yes or no such a problem. Say nothing until you have definitively made a decision. Oh, wait, no one will pay any attention to you if you do that.

Kashkakat v.2.0

(1,752 posts)
12. "resolution of disapproval" wft?? Thought it was a vote to actually rescind the
Sat Feb 23, 2019, 03:09 PM
Feb 2019

emergency order, not just "disapproval." Yeah, I spoze its likely there wont be enough repub votes to over ride prez veto, but come on! Call it what it is.

WHAT THE HECK is she dithering about???

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sen. Lisa Murkowski says ...