Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jpak

(41,757 posts)
Mon Feb 25, 2019, 09:34 PM Feb 2019

Janet Mills won't join group that supports offshore drilling

Source: Bangor Daily News

AUGUSTA, Maine — Gov. Janet Mills has reaffirmed her opposition to oil and gas drilling off the state’s coast by declining to participate in a governors’ group.

Mills, a Democrat, says Maine will not participate in the Outer Continental Shelf Governors Coalition because of concerns about the toll drilling could take on the state’s environment and marine resources. Mills wrote in a letter to the group’s chair that its “work promoting the expansion of offshore oil and gas drilling is incompatible with Maine’s interests.”

<not much more>

Read more: https://bangordailynews.com/2019/02/25/politics/janet-mills-wont-join-group-that-supports-offshore-drilling/



Another Big FU to LePage.

Love it
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
1. My friends from her hometown are pretty riled up about some transmission corridor for CMP.
Tue Feb 26, 2019, 12:40 AM
Feb 2019

Apparently she wants to cut a swath through central Maine to carry power from Canada to Massachusetts.

mainer

(12,022 posts)
2. yeah, that's an interesting and complex issue.
Tue Feb 26, 2019, 03:40 PM
Feb 2019

While it is going to be ugly, seeing those transmission lines, I can understand why an environmentalist MIGHT support it. Those lines are carrying green energy (hydroelectric) from Point A (Canada) to Point B (Massachusetts.) It means Massachusetts won't have to burn as many fossil fuels.

If you look at it in the global sense (less use of fossil fuels) it does make sense. But of course in Maine, it means we'll lose a swath of land (although the state will get a big chunk of money in exchange.)

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
3. Could Maine tap into it and sell wind power? How about a linear park?
Tue Feb 26, 2019, 03:53 PM
Feb 2019

Maybe make key segments (in scenic areas) underground?

mainer

(12,022 posts)
4. All good questions. I think underground is wildly expensive, though.
Tue Feb 26, 2019, 04:09 PM
Feb 2019

I was wondering about undersea cables, but apparently that's not possible.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
5. Underground is 10x aboveground cost, but if it helps you get through a sensitive area, worth it.
Tue Feb 26, 2019, 04:44 PM
Feb 2019

Also it's more reliable during severe weather. My neighborhood has underground wiring (admittedly not HV transmission lines) and it's been amazingly reliable for decades of storms etc.

Oh, and undersea cables are a fundamental part of offshore wind farms. It's do-able, but perhaps not economically feasible for the particular route discussed in Maine.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Janet Mills won't join gr...