Patrick Shanahan: Pentagon chief's ties to Boeing investigated
Source: BBC
The Pentagon has launched an inquiry into acting US Defence Secretary Patrick Shanahan for alleged favouritism to his ex-employer, Boeing.
The Defence Department's inspector general will look into the matter following a complaint from a watchdog group.
Mr Shanahan is accused of frequently praising Boeing in meetings about government contracts and acquisitions.
Mr Shanahan, who denies any wrongdoing, spent 30 years at Boeing.
He rose through the ranks to become a senior executive at the world's biggest planemaker.
Read more: https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-us-canada-47647865
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)volstork
(5,400 posts)sent their Black Boxes to France. The US is so corrupt that they would likely sweep any information under the rug.
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)It is everywhere you turn. He is basically a lobbyist for Boeing so he most likely is receiving compensation of some sort from Boeing. It is a matter of follow the money in our largely unregulated world.
Locrian
(4,522 posts)it's just "normal" business practice to operate like this
Short of someone physically carrying in cartoon like bags of money to meetings, it's all accepted.
notdarkyet
(2,226 posts)Space for so many criminals?
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)kimbutgar
(21,130 posts)Of this corporate toady being investigated and thrown out.
Despite opinions to the contrary and the occasional rotten apple, the majority of the DoD (both military and civilian) are folks who believe in the US and its core principles.
And I'm sure Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman also support this IG investigation, too. Defense contractors prefer a level competitive playing field.
Socal31
(2,484 posts)As soon as the budget was released with a F-15X that nobody asked for, and a drop in F-35 procurement.
Zorro
(15,740 posts)There was the Darleen Druyan scandal in the early 2000s, and then the Lockheed missile trade secrets theft later in the decade.
Haven't heard of any significant Lockheed scandals since they were bribing the Japanese PM in the 70s.
DeminPennswoods
(15,278 posts)I doubt anyone cares one way or the other, business will go on as usual as it has for decades.
I'll also note that there are very few military aircraft manufactures left in the US. It's basically down to Boeing and Lockheed-Martin after Boeing bought McDonnell Douglas.
Socal31
(2,484 posts)Lockheed Martin made sure that this didnt go under the radar.