Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nitpicker

(7,153 posts)
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 04:31 AM Mar 2019

Indonesian airline Garuda cancels order for 49 Boeing 737 Max 8 jets

Source: The Guardian

Indonesia’s national carrier Garuda has cancelled a multibillion-dollar order for 49 Boeing 737 Max 8 jets after two fatal crashes involving the plane, the company said, blaming passengers’ loss of trust in the aircraft.

In what is thought to be the first formal cancellation for the model, Garuda spokesman Ikhsan Rosan said: “We have sent a letter to Boeing requesting that the order be cancelled.
(snip)

As Boeing continued to work on a fix for the planes grounded by airlines across the world, reports on Friday suggested that the manufacturer would make it compulsory for airlines buying the aircraft to have one of two optional safety features installed.

The equipment alerts pilots of faulty information from key sensors. It will now be included on every 737 Max as part of changes that Boeing is rushing to complete on the jets by early next week, according to two people familiar with the changes.
(snip)

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/mar/22/indonesian-airline-garuda-cancels-order-for-49-boeing-737-max-8-jets

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Indonesian airline Garuda cancels order for 49 Boeing 737 Max 8 jets (Original Post) nitpicker Mar 2019 OP
I don't blame them. Socal31 Mar 2019 #1
The problem is? Aussie105 Mar 2019 #2
See this cvoogt Mar 2019 #12
Wow! 49 jets is a really big order KelleyKramer Mar 2019 #3
And so it begins Sherman A1 Mar 2019 #4
+1 Baitball Blogger Mar 2019 #7
I have to question the decision making at Boeing. Lonestarblue Mar 2019 #5
In their defense, Boeing was just responding Blue_Tires Mar 2019 #10
300+ dead passengers and crew weren't enough to get Boeing's attention .. . hatrack Mar 2019 #6
+1000 Baitball Blogger Mar 2019 #8
All this to up-charge for a few lines of computer code. mackdaddy Mar 2019 #9
Believe it or not, this isn't the first disaster Blue_Tires Mar 2019 #11

Aussie105

(5,318 posts)
2. The problem is?
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 05:03 AM
Mar 2019

From my reading of preliminary analysis, the problem is with the anti-stall feature. Location of the engines more forward on the wings than usual is supposed to give the plane a tendency to go nose up all by itself. Sensors in the tail and software counteract this. Failure of the sensor or the software makes the plane nose dive despite pilot intervention.

Question: where is the 'off' switch for the system?

Why can't a simple 'Siri, turn autopilot off' do the job?

Got to wonder though. What are the 'optional safety features'? Does it include one big OFF switch?

Baitball Blogger

(46,676 posts)
7. +1
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 08:23 AM
Mar 2019

I'm surprised it took this long, the way that the top of most corporations keep making such stupid decisions...much like Republicans handle policy on climate change.

Lonestarblue

(9,958 posts)
5. I have to question the decision making at Boeing.
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 06:25 AM
Mar 2019

From what I’ve read, Boeing was trying to extend the life of an old model and avoid the cost of a redesign, perhaps understandable when lives are not at stake. But moving the engines in a frame that was not designed to have them in that location and thus knowingly delivering a plane with a tendency to stall seems not only shortsighted but also negligent toward the safety of the flying public. That redesign should never have been approved by the FAA, and maybe this will finally result in some changes in that far too cozy relationship. I suspect Boeing will lose more orders for this plane. Pilots and the public both may refuse to fly it.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
10. In their defense, Boeing was just responding
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 10:16 AM
Mar 2019

to what airlines said they wanted in the next upgraded 737... These changes didn't happen in a vacuum

hatrack

(59,566 posts)
6. 300+ dead passengers and crew weren't enough to get Boeing's attention .. .
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 07:33 AM
Mar 2019

But I'm sure billions of dollars in lost orders will.

mackdaddy

(1,522 posts)
9. All this to up-charge for a few lines of computer code.
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 09:12 AM
Mar 2019

The planes already had two of these wind vane like stall sensors. They even had code that would compare the readings between the two and notify the pilots if there was a discrepancy.

But Boeing decided that they could squeeze $ out of their customers to let them know if the Boeing supplied hardware had a failure! Hey it's not Boeing fault the airline did not pay for this.

Boeing has caused hundreds of deaths, and cost the company billions because they wanted to charge for something that basically cost them nothing.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
11. Believe it or not, this isn't the first disaster
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 10:19 AM
Mar 2019

that could have been prevented had the airline shelled out a few more bucks for extra safety features and it won't be the last

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Indonesian airline Garuda...