Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,922 posts)
Tue May 28, 2019, 08:47 PM May 2019

DOJ agrees to make Mueller court activity public, with some redactions

Source: CNN

The Justice Department said Tuesday it agrees that a federal court Washington can make public lists describing potentially hundreds of miscellaneous court actions, like search warrants, used in the Mueller investigation.

The department asked for three weeks to make redactions on "a few entries" because of ongoing law enforcement efforts, and a judge said she would give the agency that time.

CNN had asked the court to make the lists public. The unsealing would not necessarily reveal the details of the court filings, but instead give the public a broader overview of how, when and for what Mueller was going to the federal court to gather evidence.

Mueller said in his final report that his team had received almost 800 search, seizure and communications warrants from federal courts in the investigation, yet his office wouldn't give more detail. It's still unknown exactly how many of those were approved by judges in federal court in DC.

Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/doj-agrees-to-make-mueller-court-activity-public-with-some-redactions/ar-AAC3794?li=BBnb7Kz

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DOJ agrees to make Mueller court activity public, with some redactions (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2019 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author Still In Wisconsin May 2019 #1
Lists...doesn't sound like grand jury testimony. Karadeniz May 2019 #2
It's not. Igel May 2019 #3

Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Igel

(35,300 posts)
3. It's not.
Tue May 28, 2019, 10:02 PM
May 2019

Nor is it selectively but indiscriminately released classified information, nor information about on-going investigations and cases.

In other words, it's still playing by the rules.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»DOJ agrees to make Muelle...