Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,378 posts)
Mon Jul 1, 2019, 03:58 PM Jul 2019

Nick Sandmann in court for first time in $250M defamation suit against Washington Post

Source: Cincinnati Enquirer

Nick Sandmann in court for first time in $250M defamation suit against Washington Post
Max Londberg, Cincinnati Enquirer Published 3:29 p.m. ET July 1, 2019 | Updated 3:31 p.m. ET July 1, 2019

COVINGTON – Nick Sandmann, a Covington Catholic student seeking more than three-quarters of $1 billion against several media companies, was in court for one of the pending lawsuits for the first time on Monday.

Sandmann sat in a blue suit between his lawyers, L. Lin Wood and Todd McMurtry, as arguments were heard in a federal courtroom in Covington.

Nick's first defamation suit was filed against The Washington Post. He seeks $250 million for the paper's coverage of a late-January incident on the Lincoln Memorial in which Sandmann and his classmates encountered a Native American group.

Judge William O. Bertelsman heard from Sandmann's attorneys and those from The Washington Post, which has made a motion to dismiss the allegations against it. Bertelsman did not rule on the motion in court, saying he will review the arguments and reach a decision in the coming weeks.
....

Read more: https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2019/07/01/nick-sandmann-covcath-court-washington-post-defamation-suit/1618213001/

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nick Sandmann in court for first time in $250M defamation suit against Washington Post (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2019 OP
Let's hope the case gets thrown out jpak Jul 2019 #1
Still looking like a jerk extvbroadcaster Jul 2019 #2
Nahh.... reACTIONary Jul 2019 #15
Whiney little racist turd, pushed into litigating by his miserable racist parents. SunSeeker Jul 2019 #3
The little jerk's mother is a VP for Fidelity Investments in Cincinnati Hokie Jul 2019 #4
Yeah They_Live Jul 2019 #12
Probably Vanguard Hokie Jul 2019 #17
If there are several suits, one of the defendants will fold. 3Hotdogs Jul 2019 #5
Yes, odds are this will pay off to some degree. LuvNewcastle Jul 2019 #6
Why do you think that is the case? onenote Jul 2019 #7
A respondent has liability -- actually, the respondent's insurance company does. 3Hotdogs Jul 2019 #16
Would that not encourage more frivolous suits against anyone who pays. Flaleftist Jul 2019 #11
This case is bogus and should be dismissed Gothmog Jul 2019 #8
Waste of court time RayStar Jul 2019 #13
This grandstanding smirking little shit Haggis for Breakfast Jul 2019 #9
I hate that he is most likely going to get some of that money dustyscamp Jul 2019 #10
Dismissal. paleotn Jul 2019 #14
I think smirking shit will be found a limited purpose public figure Hokie Jul 2019 #18

extvbroadcaster

(343 posts)
2. Still looking like a jerk
Mon Jul 1, 2019, 04:26 PM
Jul 2019

Nick Sandmann looked like a jerk at the Lincoln Memorial, and now he continues to be one as he sues anybody and everything trying to get some bucks. I am sure some attorney has convinced the kid he is owed millions. I hope all he gets is bus fare home.

Hokie

(4,286 posts)
4. The little jerk's mother is a VP for Fidelity Investments in Cincinnati
Mon Jul 1, 2019, 05:21 PM
Jul 2019

His parents are behind this. I have considered moving my Fidelity IRA's elsewhere and telling Fidelity Mrs. Sandmann is the reason.

They_Live

(3,231 posts)
12. Yeah
Mon Jul 1, 2019, 08:13 PM
Jul 2019

I had the same thought. Where you move them? I ask out of curiosity, and if there are any uncompromised investment firms.

Hokie

(4,286 posts)
17. Probably Vanguard
Wed Jul 3, 2019, 04:24 PM
Jul 2019

But I will see how these lawsuits play out. I will give Fidelity a chance to comment also. They have been good to work with over the years.

3Hotdogs

(12,366 posts)
16. A respondent has liability -- actually, the respondent's insurance company does.
Mon Jul 1, 2019, 09:36 PM
Jul 2019

Depending on the complaint, the insurance company lawyer may advise the ins company to avoid potential damages and just settle.

Flaleftist

(3,473 posts)
11. Would that not encourage more frivolous suits against anyone who pays.
Mon Jul 1, 2019, 08:03 PM
Jul 2019

They would basically be saying "We pay for BS lawsuits".

paleotn

(17,911 posts)
14. Dismissal.
Mon Jul 1, 2019, 08:50 PM
Jul 2019

These shitheads won't see one thin dime. I suppose diddy will have to pay for snot noses's lawyers.

Hokie

(4,286 posts)
18. I think smirking shit will be found a limited purpose public figure
Wed Jul 3, 2019, 04:30 PM
Jul 2019

He inserted himself in the standoff intentionally. That raises the bar of proof for smirking shit to a high level. They would have to prove malice or intentional deceit on the part of CNN.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Nick Sandmann in court fo...