Nike featuring Betsy Ross flag canceled after backlash
Source: CNN
New York(CNN Business) Nike is canceling a sneaker that featured the "Betsy Ross" version of the American flag from the late 18th century.
"Nike made the decision to halt distribution of the Air Max 1 Quick Strike Fourth of July based on concerns that it could unintentionally offend and detract from the nation's patriotic holiday," Nike said in a statement to CNN Business. "Nike is a company proud of its American heritage."
The Wall Street Journal reported earlier that Nike (NKE) delivered the sneakers to retailers, but asked stores to return them to Nike after the company received a complaint from former NFL star Colin Kaepernick. The Journal indicated Kaepernick said he and others found the shoe offensive because of its ties to America's era of slavery.
The shoe was set to be released Monday for $140, according to Sneakernews.com. The website included photos of a shoe that featured a version of the American flag with 13 stars organized in a circle and 13 stripes. That version of the flag, according to the Smithsonian, was used in the United States from 1777 to 1795.
Read more: https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/07/01/business/nike-air-max-1-quick-strike-fourth-of-july/index.html
jcmaine72
(1,773 posts)It's replaced the Confederate flag in many circles as a symbol of white nationalism. Whereas the racism behind any public display of the Confederate flag was pretty overt, the Betsy Ross gives these hatemongers plausible deniability. When called on it, as they are now, they argue that it's an American flag, our first flag, and that anyone who objects to its display is anti-American and a commie.
This, sadly, was one of the unintended (but ultimately necessary) consequences of driving the Confederate flag out of the public space. Before, it was pretty obvious who these scumbags were and what they believed. Now, just as they've artfully done with language on social media to avoid getting banned, racists have co-opted other symbols, words and images to express their supremacist beliefs, all while claiming such things are innocuous.
Frankly, I'm surprised Nike even attempted to market such a product in the first place. Just goes to show how out of touch big corporations are.
The Mouth
(3,145 posts)That's the stupidest fucking thing I've read all day.
We ALREADY lost the 'OK' sign because some morons were successfully trolled by 4/chan.
Anyone who believes or propagates this is a blithering idiot and a tool of trolls.
Massive load of stupid bullshit.
I respected Colion, but he has his head up his ass on this one.
Personally I wish someone had slapped upside the head the first jackass to do anything other than laugh when anyone tried to seriously say that the 'OK sign was a white power symbol, unfortunately too many goddamned idiots let them win that one so that now it can be considered by non idiots to have that meaning.
Just. Stop. it.
targetpractice
(4,919 posts)I don't know how many times years ago I've heard straight people express faux outrage that the "homosexuals took a perfectly good word 'gay' and made it their own."
Well, my predecessors did. And, "gay" is ours now.
Interest groups co-opt cultural symbols all the time. It's easier to co-opt the "OK" gesture than to invent some new one. Once it spreads, this phenomenon is hard to stop. It's frustrating, but it's difficult to protest and stop the momentum... no matter how detestable the purpose.
I did not know that the Betsy Ross flag had been co-opted, but apparently it has... And, Nike, took the responsible step to protect their brand. They know their customer base. For those that object, there is always New Balance.
Response to targetpractice (Reply #6)
Post removed
Response to targetpractice (Reply #6)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Igel
(35,293 posts)It wasn't originally used by white supremacist groups. It was *claimed* by a satirist to be used by white-supremacist groups, because it suited his satire--not because he was making an actual serious claim.
That was enough to taint it and consider it to be too dangerous to use. Quickly it spread among those quick to judge and slow to think that anybody who used it was racist. Similar to the way that the "vaccines cause autism" claims spread. Ignore the facts, we need to be able to blame somebody, quickly, without having to actual worry about evidence.
Finally it jumped from the left-leaning "must not even allow a suspicion of my virtue by using that sign or defending its use" folk to the white supremacist. Who used it to troll lefties.
Perhaps it finally took root among some white supremacists. But it's now a fundamental of belief among some that every use of it--even by those who would be the object of attacks by white supremacists, even by those who have no white-supremacist organization associations--is prima facie proof, adequate on its own, to show white-supremacist ideology on the part of the user.
The problem is the almost pathological fear of heretical "taint" and judgment that squelches any sort of reasoning or common sense and brooks no dissent. "Gay" was "lost" in the same way--if somebody, somewhere, uses it to mean "homosexual" then any red-blooded American male, with the same kind of pathological fear of being judged and having somebody believe something about you that isn't (necessarily) true, will run from letting himself be called "gay". In fact, the dangerous meaning of the word gets projected back in time, because against that kind of judgmentalism there is no real defense.
targetpractice
(4,919 posts)My comments were not about merit, but simply something along the lines that you "can't put the toothpaste back in the tube."
I think once a word, symbol, or meme (in the Richard Dawkins sense) is co-opted and begins to propagate... It's very hard to advocate against it and promote a return to the original meaning, because society simply doesn't care.
That's the nature of linguistics... I find the "vocal fry" super annoying, but who am I to stop that?
Oh, and the internet has made this phenomenon much, much more rapid.
MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)Specifically, she was a Quaker (Society of Friends), which was instrumental in first ridding England of the slave trade, then the Underground Railroad, and finally abolition of slavery in the USA.
You would think the white supremacists would pick a different flag than her version.
Of course, they are stupid and ignorant of history. So maybe so.
targetpractice
(4,919 posts)I love DU because of folks like you, MosheFeingold!
MichMan
(11,899 posts)MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)Because he plays a childrens game very well.
Not exactly important in my book.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Adults already have a hard enough time following along.
MichMan
(11,899 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)I don't think kids can keep up with the concepts in the NFL when the adults have a hard enough time as it is.
MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)But he plays with a ball. Athletes are not people I look to for anything.
Otherwise, I suppose Ill go ask Tim Tebow for geopolitical advice.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Kaepernick was mostly famous in football circles because of a Super Bowl appearance but he became famous among non sports people because of his protest of racial injustice. Like Muhammad Ali or Tommie Smith & John Carlos.
Dr. Strange
(25,917 posts)He ain't a smart guy.
rwsanders
(2,596 posts)caught on to the irony of their corporate funded AstroTurf asses trying to coopt the Boston Tea Party. Which from what I have read was partly a swipe not just at Britain, but an early multinational corporation, the British East India Tea Company (sierrraclub.org : meet the corporation).
I'm frustrated because I'm not really fond of flying our current flag as it appears to have become a hated symbol of our imperialism. So I had been intending to fly this one as a suggestion that we return to the values as expressed in the Declaration of Independence, prior to the compromises in the constitution.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)After all its a silly old symbol and in Sanskrit stands for well being . How cAn anyone be against something like that and think it means any more ? Plenty of many like you may have asked last century and ignored it and the people behind it
Sapient Donkey
(1,568 posts)Last edited Thu Jul 4, 2019, 02:56 AM - Edit history (1)
But there does appear to be some merits to it. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/02/business/betsy-ross-shoe-kaepernick-nike.html
So, it's not just something someone made up or a single instance of a racist waving it.
That being said, I don't like the idea of letting these people take over the flag for their own uses. By claiming it's a symbol of hate that should be tucked away, then we're pretty much just giving it to them.
ck4829
(35,041 posts)3Hotdogs
(12,358 posts)Now, I ain't never spending $140 on a pair of sneaks anyways....
AllaN01Bear
(18,101 posts)i got one in my closet that i was given from my church on the bicentenial of our country. its either called betsy ross , bennington, spirit of 1776. or , this ,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cowpens_flag
these people stole lots of ideas of other pple and co opted them. p s : they also had the "dont tread on me flag" during the obama years . also known as the Gadsden flag, original had each name of the orginal colonies and said " live free or die. i agree. $140.00 big deal . shear profit mode umbriago. give me a good ole pair of keds tennis shoes and ill be happy. opps im ageing mysel.
bucolic_frolic
(43,115 posts)There was King Phillip's War, and Roger's Rangers. It wasn't a Rainbow Coalition.
Maxheader
(4,371 posts)Best thing about this is the winger heads are shaking with rage...
Polybius
(15,364 posts)I personally love the Betsy Ross flag. I think Nike will reverse its stance and sales will go through the roof. Maybe it's all for publicity.
Gore1FL
(21,116 posts)b. The flag should never touch anything beneath it, such as the ground, the floor, water, or merchandise.
c. The flag should never be carried flat or horizontally, but always aloft and free.
d. The flag should never be used as wearing apparel, bedding, or drapery. It should never be festooned, drawn back, nor up, in folds, but always allowed to fall free.
e. The flag should never be fastened, displayed, used, or stored in such a manner as to permit it to be easily torn, soiled, or damaged in any way.
g. The flag should never have placed upon it, nor on any part of it, nor attached to it any mark, insignia, letter, word, figure, design, picture, or drawing of any nature.
i. The flag should never be used for advertising purposes in any manner whatsoever. It should not be embroidered on such articles as cushions or handkerchiefs and the like, printed or otherwise impressed on paper napkins or boxes or anything that is designed for temporary use and discard.
j. No part of the flag should ever be used as a costume or athletic uniform. However, a flag patch may be affixed to the uniform of military personnel, firemen, policemen, and members of patriotic organizations.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/4/8
I find it hilarious that those who figuratively wrap themselves in the flag now want to literally wrap their feet in the flag. It really doesn't matter if all of this violates more flag code than burning it. At least the right gives us things to laugh at them for.
MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)1. Only applies to things that started out a a flag. Not things that resemble the US flag so wear that flag bikini proudly. (Ha)
2. Was declared unconstitutional as it violates free speech rights. Its just on the books.
Gore1FL
(21,116 posts)You can't stomp through mud puddles in flag shoes and have moral standing to criticize those who burn the flag. The target audience for this shoe would do just that.
clementine613
(561 posts)The Betsy Ross flag is not the official flag. The official flag has 50 stars. Does the law apply to any version of the flag or only the official current one?
Gore1FL
(21,116 posts)It's more of a do and don't etiquette list. It that manner, I think it covers historic and present-day flags.