Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mrs. Overall

(6,839 posts)
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 02:09 PM Aug 2019

Trump says administration looking 'seriously' at ending birthright citizenship

Source: The Hill

President Trump on Wednesday said his administration is once again seriously considering an executive order to end birthright citizenship months after several lawmakers cast doubt on his ability to take such action.

"We're looking at that very seriously," Trump told reporters as he left the White House for Kentucky. "Birthright citizenship, where you have a baby on our land -- walk over the border, have a baby, congratulations, the baby's now a U.S. citizen."

"We are looking at birthright citizenship very seriously," he added. "It’s, frankly, ridiculous."

The president proposed ending the practice that grants citizenship to those born in the United States during his 2016 presidential campaign. He revived the idea last year, saying he would sign an executive order to enact the change. Numerous lawmakers, including several Republicans, quickly pushed back on the idea and argued Trump lacked the authority to make such a change using an executive order. They cited that birthright citizenship is a right enshrined under the 14th Amendment.

Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/458276-trump-says-administration-looking-seriously-at-ending-birthright?__twitter_impression=true

63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump says administration looking 'seriously' at ending birthright citizenship (Original Post) Mrs. Overall Aug 2019 OP
The nuts over at free republic are ecstatic over this. They Meadowoak Aug 2019 #1
The same people who thought EO's by Obama were always an over-reach bitterross Aug 2019 #7
Yet another example of how little the rethugs think of the Constitution. They will PaulRevere08 Aug 2019 #27
He should start with all of those Russians who fly into his FL properties to give birth and fly back TheBlackAdder Aug 2019 #38
Agreed not_the_one Aug 2019 #46
They're literally pissing their pants at the thought COLGATE4 Aug 2019 #47
Precedent for an EO to cancel the Second Amendment. keithbvadu2 Aug 2019 #52
But how will Mar a Lago and other Trump properties cope dobleremolque Aug 2019 #2
THAT won't go over bigly with the Russian and Chinese oligarchs who no_hypocrisy Aug 2019 #3
The racism is in full bloom today n/t hibbing Aug 2019 #4
I think I know what they mean, but but but bucolic_frolic Aug 2019 #5
The population wouldn't collapse FiveGoodMen Aug 2019 #13
Those with money will buy citizenship. The rest of us will be their slaves. nt NCjack Aug 2019 #16
If that is what they intend they misread America in every sense bucolic_frolic Aug 2019 #17
They have been taking it away and we haven't responded. FiveGoodMen Aug 2019 #18
Since tRump is the Chosen One he's above the Constitution groundloop Aug 2019 #6
14th Amendment, Section 1 Red Pest Aug 2019 #8
Below captures where I'm at with this shitshow maxrandb Aug 2019 #11
Almost makes you wonder if his SCOTUS would rule in his favor rurallib Aug 2019 #12
That's when we find out how corrupt the Court is. TeamPooka Aug 2019 #20
It would give us a reason to impeach them all if we gain control Of Congress. wasupaloopa Aug 2019 #35
Thx for pointing us to the 14th amendment Thekaspervote Aug 2019 #23
The key phrase is customerserviceguy Aug 2019 #36
Their argument is that the 14th was *entirely* The Mouth Aug 2019 #49
EVERYBODY read the last paragraph above. WhoWoodaKnew Aug 2019 #60
Ah yes. Overturning the US Constitution by Executive Order Freethinker65 Aug 2019 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author TreasonousBastard Aug 2019 #10
Impeach evertonfc Aug 2019 #14
let's just all self-deport ourselves unless IcyPeas Aug 2019 #15
Native Americans are probably descended from Siberian migrants ... JustABozoOnThisBus Aug 2019 #59
Go fuck yourself with a steaming corn cob you traitorous unpatriotic moron N/T flotsam Aug 2019 #19
Wouldn't that be a great tool for coercion? colorado_ufo Aug 2019 #21
They're working on their master loophole. It's been done before. FiveGoodMen Aug 2019 #31
Donnie, which part of the 14th Amendment don't you understand? rsdsharp Aug 2019 #22
The part where it's not up to him FiveGoodMen Aug 2019 #32
Since when can you repeal a constitutional amendment by executive order? n/t MBS Aug 2019 #24
Guess we may find out! durablend Aug 2019 #25
Yeah! Newest Reality Aug 2019 #28
Since his opposition took impeachment off the table. FiveGoodMen Aug 2019 #34
You can tweak words in an Amendment customerserviceguy Aug 2019 #37
I feel like we should repeal the 2nd amendment next IronLionZion Aug 2019 #42
Many want to reinterpret it. Igel Aug 2019 #43
OUT. NOW. Any excuse is spineless. OUT. n/t Guilded Lilly Aug 2019 #26
+ 1000 n/t MBS Aug 2019 #29
He is driven by hate. A life lived as he does generates such negative karma wasupaloopa Aug 2019 #30
Will it be done retroactively? area51 Aug 2019 #33
Why are we automatically talking about adjusting to this. No. Take his ass to court. We won't lose. ancianita Aug 2019 #39
That's a hellaciously strong executive order he can issue... jmowreader Aug 2019 #40
Start with Barron. Kid Berwyn Aug 2019 #41
+1 dalton99a Aug 2019 #44
You can go back even further to BumRushDaShow Aug 2019 #48
This is just the start duforsure Aug 2019 #45
There seems to be no depths of cruelty he's not willing to plum... BadGimp Aug 2019 #50
I think my Grandparents on both sides came here legally but I would have no way of proving it. katmondoo Aug 2019 #51
Funny thing... Chicago1980 Aug 2019 #53
Barron was born March 20, 2006, so conceived in 2005 (thus alive, according to RWers) before Melania Celerity Aug 2019 #54
I say - let 'em do it. SpankMe Aug 2019 #55
Isn't Donald Trump himself a citizen just because he was born here? tclambert Aug 2019 #56
So a president's executive order can override the Constitution? Kablooie Aug 2019 #57
So it's fine for Trump to call the US Constitution "ridiculous", but he throws a tantrum ... muriel_volestrangler Aug 2019 #58
The issue of birthright citizenship came before the Supreme Court in 1898 Fortinbras Armstrong Aug 2019 #61
Trump still hasn't read the constitution. Nitram Aug 2019 #62
Can an XO Trump the Constitution? malthaussen Aug 2019 #63
 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
7. The same people who thought EO's by Obama were always an over-reach
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 02:22 PM
Aug 2019

The lack of consistency in their position does not surprise me one bit.

PaulRevere08

(449 posts)
27. Yet another example of how little the rethugs think of the Constitution. They will
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 03:15 PM
Aug 2019

do anything to protect their version of the 2nd amendment. The other 26 not so much.

 

not_the_one

(2,227 posts)
46. Agreed
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 06:00 PM
Aug 2019

Imagine about 20 to 25 years from now...

All those Russian/American dual citizens can fly in, set up, and do whatever they want, and we have given them absolute free access. Thanks to turdface allowing his properties to be used for that purpose.

Don't you think that Putin sees this as an easy way to get us? He is always looking at the long term plan....

Apparently there are hotels set up on both coasts, just for rich foreigners to fly in, have the baby and leave, and it is an American citizen. (I don't know if the west coast hotels are the turds... but Miami has them.)

So, on one hand we have POC babies and children, being held indefinitely, and while that is happening they are receiving NO education, so they are angry AND uninformed (and if they grow up in the US, angry and uninformed, they will also have easy access to guns of any kind)

and

on the other hand we have a perfect birthing and incubation of Russian infiltrators, with money to do whatever they want, hell bent on causing maximum chaos...

What could possibly go wrong?

I have no problem with making it a little more difficult to being an American citizen.

That DOESN'T mean I am in agreement with turdface. There can be a rational and workable solution.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
47. They're literally pissing their pants at the thought
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 06:02 PM
Aug 2019

that Dumpy and his minions can take away the citizenship already children born in the US under the terms of the 14th Amendment - so much so that many are hoping hope against hope that Dumbshit "makes it retroactive, 50 or 60 years". This is some serious stupid, combined with an extra helping of cray cray.

keithbvadu2

(36,660 posts)
52. Precedent for an EO to cancel the Second Amendment.
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 09:46 PM
Aug 2019

Precedent for an EO to cancel the Second Amendment.

You're sure about this, FR?

no_hypocrisy

(46,025 posts)
3. THAT won't go over bigly with the Russian and Chinese oligarchs who
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 02:17 PM
Aug 2019

get Tourist Visas for certain pregnant women with the purpose of giving birth in this country and obtaining a passport and a Social Security card.

bucolic_frolic

(43,054 posts)
5. I think I know what they mean, but but but
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 02:17 PM
Aug 2019

strictly speaking, "ending birthright citizenship" means no more new naturally born citizens. This would lead to population collapse.

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
13. The population wouldn't collapse
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 02:34 PM
Aug 2019

We'd just all be slaves instead of citizens with rights.

And that is EXACTLY the point!

bucolic_frolic

(43,054 posts)
17. If that is what they intend they misread America in every sense
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 02:54 PM
Aug 2019

They would provoke a fight to the finish. Live free or die. Americans don't often live that way because they enslave themselves willingly to debt, laws, rules, regulations, but just try to take it all away and they will respond.

Red Pest

(288 posts)
8. 14th Amendment, Section 1
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 02:22 PM
Aug 2019
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Executive order to block birthright citizenship - total bullshit. Trump is not a king (not of the USA or of Israel) and certainly not the second coming of God.

Basically, what we have is a man flailing around trying to find something to save his dying presidency. We have had enough (Dayenu!) of him and his enablers.

rurallib

(62,382 posts)
12. Almost makes you wonder if his SCOTUS would rule in his favor
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 02:28 PM
Aug 2019

on a challenge to such an EO.

Seems pretty black & white to me, but I am no Supreme Court justice beholden to Trump or the right wing in this country.

Welcome to DU

Thekaspervote

(32,707 posts)
23. Thx for pointing us to the 14th amendment
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 03:05 PM
Aug 2019

Don’t think SCOTUS would even touch that. Conservative or no

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
36. The key phrase is
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 03:44 PM
Aug 2019

"...and subject to the jurisdiction thereof..."

Clearly, a child born to a foreign diplomat stationed in the US is not a US citizen. It could also be argued that if an invading army conquered part of the US, that children arising from such a circumstance also would not be covered by the Amendment.

The Trump administration will use that line of reasoning with the SCOTUS.

The Mouth

(3,145 posts)
49. Their argument is that the 14th was *entirely*
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 06:51 PM
Aug 2019

about ensuring that slaves and their children would be citizens. I do think that was the original intent, but the wording of the Constitution is what it is regardless of any original reasons; anyone who doesn't like what the Constitutions says needs to get it changed rather than bitch or try to override it, left or right.

Freethinker65

(9,999 posts)
9. Ah yes. Overturning the US Constitution by Executive Order
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 02:24 PM
Aug 2019

Why hasn't anyone one else tried that before???

Ailto and Thomas might go along with it, and Kavanaugh if you give him a keg or two.

Response to Mrs. Overall (Original post)

 

evertonfc

(1,713 posts)
14. Impeach
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 02:46 PM
Aug 2019

This statement alone should be the alarm to start impeachment hearings. This is as dangerous a statement as you can make. The very Constitution is on the line.

IcyPeas

(21,841 posts)
15. let's just all self-deport ourselves unless
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 02:49 PM
Aug 2019

you are Native American. and start all over again peacefully.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,321 posts)
59. Native Americans are probably descended from Siberian migrants ...
Thu Aug 22, 2019, 06:52 AM
Aug 2019

... who crossed the Bering Sea and inhabited a continent. And none of those migrants had green cards.

So we all need to leave, with the horses we rode in on.

colorado_ufo

(5,730 posts)
21. Wouldn't that be a great tool for coercion?
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 02:59 PM
Aug 2019

"Become a Republican (Trumpian?), vote accordingly, or have your birthright citizenship yanked.

If it can be done for one, where would it stop?

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
31. They're working on their master loophole. It's been done before.
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 03:26 PM
Aug 2019
The 1936 Soviet Constitution, adopted on 5 December 1936 and also known as the Stalin Constitution, redesigned the government of the Soviet Union. It nominally granted all manner of rights and freedoms, and spelled out a number of democratic procedures. In practice, by asserting the "leading role" of the Communist Party, it cemented the complete control of the party and its leader, Joseph Stalin.

[Emphasis mine]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1936_Constitution_of_the_Soviet_Union

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
32. The part where it's not up to him
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 03:28 PM
Aug 2019

And maybe that isn't true. If we treat our constitution like "just a goddamned piece of paper" then that's all it is.

Why isn't the whole country up in arms by now?

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)
28. Yeah!
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 03:17 PM
Aug 2019

Well, I insist that he makes his royal decree retroactive and we will all have to GTFO, which means that the Indigenous peoples get all their land back and that's the only good that would come of it.

So, when will we start packing up to leave and how will the transition of government be handed over to the American Indians? Inquiring minds want to know.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
37. You can tweak words in an Amendment
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 03:47 PM
Aug 2019

Until the 21st Amendment repealing Prohibition was ratified, the Volstead Act allowed malt beverages to have up to 0.5% alcohol by volume. While the effort to write, pass, and ratify the 21st was ongoing, FDR issued an order which changed the 0.5% to 3.2%, so Americans could have beer again.

Igel

(35,274 posts)
43. Many want to reinterpret it.
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 05:14 PM
Aug 2019

At least some by EO.

It's been done a few times, with different laws and provisions. Saying that it's only the formal militia, or that arms aren't the heirs to 18th-century firearms but precisely 18th-century firearms, or that "bear" only includes inside your house and to a local firing range (but nothing more) aren't that dissimilar.

Upthread there's a Soviet example. On the other hand, the Soviet constitution gave the rights to gun ownership. Except in practice you needed registration, training, permission, the gun had to be kept in a gun locker under militia or gun-range supervision, and if you wanted to transport it for, say, hunting you needed a special permit. (The right to own firearms was as carefully expanded and broadened as the right to freely practice religion.)

 

wasupaloopa

(4,516 posts)
30. He is driven by hate. A life lived as he does generates such negative karma
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 03:22 PM
Aug 2019

that he will be reincarnated as a fly who eats shit.

ancianita

(35,933 posts)
39. Why are we automatically talking about adjusting to this. No. Take his ass to court. We won't lose.
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 04:11 PM
Aug 2019

This is to keep his opponents busy reacting, and his base mollified.

That's IT.

Wait until he actually does something.

Then wait until lawyers actually do something back.

jmowreader

(50,528 posts)
40. That's a hellaciously strong executive order he can issue...
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 04:14 PM
Aug 2019

If he can issue an EO to overturn the 14th Amendment, he can also overturn the parts of the Constitution that require presidential elections, impose term limits, ban cruel and unusual punishment, mandate speedy trials...

duforsure

(11,884 posts)
45. This is just the start
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 05:34 PM
Aug 2019

He'll then go after all minorities and opposition groups , women, disabled people, and everyone who isn't as corrupt as he is. Just like putin did, hmmmm.

katmondoo

(6,454 posts)
51. I think my Grandparents on both sides came here legally but I would have no way of proving it.
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 07:14 PM
Aug 2019

I could be deported but to where. On my fathers side they are from Quebec On my mothers they are from Poland. No idea of where in Poland and I don't know if they were citizens. This was at the turn of the century and Poland never had stable borders. I am sure I am not the only American with this type of problem. As a protester the Trumpers could decide to deport non supporters of this regime.

Celerity

(43,107 posts)
54. Barron was born March 20, 2006, so conceived in 2005 (thus alive, according to RWers) before Melania
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 10:51 PM
Aug 2019

was a citizen. IF she was illegally here, then that opens up an interesting can of worms. Rump himself was a citizen, so I guess he would shoot that angle. Melania someday needs to be stripped of her citizenship IF she committed fraud to get it and summarily deported back to Slovenia, back to the minor leagues of gold-digging and grifting. Same for her chain-migration grifting parents.

The actual Trumps (and Jared Kushner) all belong in prison for life, save for Barron and Tiffany. Also, ALL their entire family fortune (and Jared Kushner's) needs to be seized for reparations to humanity.

SpankMe

(2,957 posts)
55. I say - let 'em do it.
Wed Aug 21, 2019, 11:14 PM
Aug 2019

Say he does the executive order, nullifies the portion of the 14th amendment that deals with birthright citizenship and it goes to courts and somehow Trump prevails.

This would become a solid, parallel and and unambiguous precedent for nullifying the 2nd amendment and getting real gun reform accomplished. So, the next time a Dem occupies the White House (and there WILL be a next time at some point) we can win on that issue using the Republicans' own rules.

They can eat my ass. All of them.

tclambert

(11,084 posts)
56. Isn't Donald Trump himself a citizen just because he was born here?
Thu Aug 22, 2019, 01:21 AM
Aug 2019

He'd never be able to pass a citizenship test.

Kablooie

(18,610 posts)
57. So a president's executive order can override the Constitution?
Thu Aug 22, 2019, 01:37 AM
Aug 2019

Sounds nice. Then he can override the 1st amendment and really get to work on the country.
Easy peasy!


muriel_volestrangler

(101,270 posts)
58. So it's fine for Trump to call the US Constitution "ridiculous", but he throws a tantrum ...
Thu Aug 22, 2019, 04:23 AM
Aug 2019

... when a discussion is called "absurd"?

I wonder if this is what the tantrum was designed to push down the news order.

Fortinbras Armstrong

(4,473 posts)
61. The issue of birthright citizenship came before the Supreme Court in 1898
Thu Aug 22, 2019, 09:17 AM
Aug 2019

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898). Wong was born in San Francisco, the son of a Chinese couple who, because of the Chinese Exclusion Acts, were legally prohibited from becoming US citizens. Wong had gone to China to visit relatives, and on return to the US, was refused admittance under the Chinese Exclusion Acts. He sued, saying that under the Fourteenth Amendment, his birth in the US made him a citizen.

The Supreme Court, by a vote of 6-2, agreed with Wong. Justice Gray wrote the majority opinion, which basically says that everyone, with a few specific exceptions -- chiefly the children of diplomats -- born in the US is a US citizen. He has a very interesting discussion of the term "natural born citizen". See https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/169/649

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump says administration...