Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

orangecrush

(19,384 posts)
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 10:44 AM Sep 2019

The White House-released transcript says it is "not a verbatim transcript of a discussion"

Source: CNN




25 min ago
The White House-released transcript says it is "not a verbatim transcript of a discussion"
From CNN's Pam Brown and Betsy Klein

A senior White House official says the transcript of the call comes from Voice Recognition Software. There is a disclaimer at the bottom of the document that it is “not a verbatim transcript of a discussion.”

Additionally, per the senior official, the White House weighed institutional interests against transparency in making the decision to release the call. Note that Ukraine’s President Zelensky gave his permission for the transcript to be released, as well.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-impeachment-inquiry-09-25-2019/h_059432c46e89de36d5896e31ea08fda3



[url=https://ibb.co/DRzfsN2][img][/img][/url]
[url=https://imgbb.com/upload]upload[/url]
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The White House-released transcript says it is "not a verbatim transcript of a discussion" (Original Post) orangecrush Sep 2019 OP
Voice recognition software my ass. How come Trump speaks in complete sentences in this one? DetlefK Sep 2019 #1
... orangecrush Sep 2019 #4
Since the transcript isn't verbatim... BlueIdaho Sep 2019 #2
Yup. orangecrush Sep 2019 #3
What we're reading is the conversation that ran in Chump's head FakeNoose Sep 2019 #18
Well said! nt. BlueIdaho Sep 2019 #23
That was a "cleaned up" version? What the hell is in the real one? Botany Sep 2019 #5
... orangecrush Sep 2019 #12
Just as good as Barr's Summary of the Mueller Report bitterross Sep 2019 #6
Better yet orangecrush Sep 2019 #10
No surprise. Extreme BS called on this. eom sprinkleeninow Sep 2019 #26
the smoke 'n mirror administration, typical repugs. nt yaesu Sep 2019 #7
Not verbatim? Then what good is it? NurseJackie Sep 2019 #8
Not sure on that... orangecrush Sep 2019 #9
+1 ck4829 Sep 2019 #25
This is only the parts which the staff wanted documented... RockRaven Sep 2019 #11
Exactly. orangecrush Sep 2019 #13
I think all telcons say that FBaggins Sep 2019 #14
and the 2019 Hugo goes to... moonseller66 Sep 2019 #15
The White House has released a photograph of the recordings being transcribed. mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2019 #16
Someone has some explaining to do here neohippie Sep 2019 #17
Yes. Where's the other 19 minutes! C_U_L8R Sep 2019 #27
Translation: bullshit. Vinca Sep 2019 #19
Merriam-Webster: 'Transcript': a typed copy of dictated or recorded material mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2019 #20
Yeah well...let's ALL DEMAND to hear the phone call--not this BS Bengus81 Sep 2019 #21
White House calls are no longer recorded orangecrush Sep 2019 #22
K&R ck4829 Sep 2019 #24
Then release the tapes - you are innocent, right? jpak Sep 2019 #28
Doonesbury, 1974: geralmar Sep 2019 #29
... orangecrush Sep 2019 #30
Wouldn't it be normal in this situation to release the DeminPennswoods Sep 2019 #31

BlueIdaho

(13,582 posts)
2. Since the transcript isn't verbatim...
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 10:52 AM
Sep 2019

fatso could have said -> You’ll get your money right after you do me this favor... the point is, a transcript that isn’t verbatim isn’t worth the paper it’s written on.

FakeNoose

(32,556 posts)
18. What we're reading is the conversation that ran in Chump's head
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 01:31 PM
Sep 2019

... so it's the only one that matters to HIM!

Botany

(70,442 posts)
5. That was a "cleaned up" version? What the hell is in the real one?
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 10:55 AM
Sep 2019

Trump to the President Zelenskyy

"The President: Well,·she' s going to go through some things. I will. have Mr. Giuliani.give you a call and I am. also going to have.Attorney General Barr call and we will get to· the bottom of it. I'm sure you will figure it out. I heard the prosecutor was treated very badly and he was a very fair prosecutor so good luck with everything. Your. economy is going to get better and better I predict. You have a lot· of assets. It's a great country. I have many Ukrainian friends, their incredible people."

 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
6. Just as good as Barr's Summary of the Mueller Report
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 10:55 AM
Sep 2019

As expected, they did not release a full, unredacted version of the transcript. Is anyone surprised?

This is more BS to try to distract. The full whistle-blower report must be delivered to Congress and the whistle-blower needs to appear before the House committees that request their presence.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
8. Not verbatim? Then what good is it?
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 11:14 AM
Sep 2019

That means it's been edited. Or that it's not accurate and that it's missing information (either intentionally or neglectfully).

Ought not there also be recordings?

RockRaven

(14,886 posts)
11. This is only the parts which the staff wanted documented...
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 11:21 AM
Sep 2019

so we are left to imagine what a verbatim transcript might include. This is, to put it mildly, of limited use.

neohippie

(1,142 posts)
17. Someone has some explaining to do here
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 12:39 PM
Sep 2019

This call transcript of the "perfect call" accounts for about 11 minutes of spoken word during a conversation that lasted for 30 mintues

I want to see the White House talking point on why there is about 19 minutes of missing conversation.

This really is starting to look like a stupid version of Watergate now.

How will they explain the missing time?







Memorandum of Phone Conversation: call was 9:03 - 9:33

Estimated time it would take to say all of the words released in the memo: 11 minutes.

Checked by the great
@mike_melia
in our broadcast software (time of spoken words matters a lot on TV) from
@NewsHour

C_U_L8R

(44,983 posts)
27. Yes. Where's the other 19 minutes!
Sun Sep 29, 2019, 06:37 PM
Sep 2019

And where are the recordings? I bet there was a recording that since been destroyed. What say you whistleblowers?

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,283 posts)
20. Merriam-Webster: 'Transcript': a typed copy of dictated or recorded material
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 01:55 PM
Sep 2019
'Transcript': 🎙 a typed copy of dictated or recorded material

'Memorandum': 📝 an informal report or message


Bengus81

(6,927 posts)
21. Yeah well...let's ALL DEMAND to hear the phone call--not this BS
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 02:06 PM
Sep 2019

Just like Nixon did with the tapes and how SHOCKING they were when everyone got to hear the REAL DEAL and not some made up transcript fantasy.

DeminPennswoods

(15,265 posts)
31. Wouldn't it be normal in this situation to release the
Mon Sep 30, 2019, 04:33 AM
Sep 2019

exculpatory parts and hide the incriminating ones behind the ellipses, or at least include the them?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The White House-released ...