Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,488 posts)
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 09:18 PM Sep 2019

Whistleblower tentatively agrees to testify, attorneys say, as long as they get appropriate clearanc

Source: CNN

The anonymous whistleblower who filed a complaint with the intelligence community inspector general, which includes allegations about President Donald Trump's conduct, has tentatively agreed to meet with congressional lawmakers, according to correspondence obtained by CNN.

The meeting will take place on the condition that acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire approves appropriate security clearances for the individual's legal counsel so that they can accompany their client, the correspondence showed.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff wrote a letter to Maguire making the request Wednesday after the whistleblower's lawyers agreed to meet with lawmakers if that condition is met and requested assistance in expediting approval from the acting DNI.

CNN reported Tuesday that the whistleblower's legal counsel "wrote to the Acting Director of National Intelligence to request specific guidance as to the appropriate security practices to permit a meeting, if needed, with the Members of the Intelligence Oversight Committees."

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/25/politics/whistleblower-agrees-to-testify/index.html

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Whistleblower tentatively agrees to testify, attorneys say, as long as they get appropriate clearanc (Original Post) brooklynite Sep 2019 OP
Is this something that would be public or behind closed doors? bearsfootball516 Sep 2019 #1
Yes, because it is classified. vsrazdem Sep 2019 #2
"Yes" is not a rational answer to an "A or B" question. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2019 #5
It is going to be both, as it often is in such situations, but not immediately. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2019 #6
Joseph Maguire, it's all on you Lulu KC Sep 2019 #3
Things are moving so fast, I need... orangecrush Sep 2019 #4
Am I the only one worried about this individual's personal safety ? Haggis for Breakfast Sep 2019 #7
No MustLoveBeagles Sep 2019 #8
No oswaldactedalone Sep 2019 #9
Adam Schiff said earlier today Totally Tunsie Sep 2019 #10
In no way! Hoping so hard he will be guarded better than Epstein, clearly! Gotta hope he makes it.nt Judi Lynn Sep 2019 #13
This is going to be explosive! ffr Sep 2019 #11
Republican already came out and said the whistle blower wasn't anything Linda Ed Sep 2019 #12

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,988 posts)
6. It is going to be both, as it often is in such situations, but not immediately.
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 10:22 PM
Sep 2019

Ultimately it will all come out and there will be public hearings.

But per the article first there will be a meeting with the Intelligence committee and not Congress.

Totally Tunsie

(10,885 posts)
10. Adam Schiff said earlier today
Wed Sep 25, 2019, 11:49 PM
Sep 2019

"...and I just want to say to the whistleblower, 'We will do everything possible to protect you'."



This might be a classic case for the Witness Protection Program. Sadly, the WB, who did the right thing, will be one that has to suffer for their good deed.

Linda Ed

(493 posts)
12. Republican already came out and said the whistle blower wasn't anything
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 03:50 AM
Sep 2019

Than another person came out and said it was "explosive"

I hope it is explosive so we get rid of the UNFIT ILLEGITIMATE potus...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Whistleblower tentatively...