House Stresses Impeachment Need In Request Court Not To Pause McGahn Ruling
Source: TPM
In their request, lawmakers stressed their need for McGahns testimony in the fast-moving impeachment inquiry and said that putting on hold the ruling compelling his testimony would cost the House its opportunity to consider the evidence McGahn has to offer.
McGahn is an eyewitness to some of the misconduct that the Committee is investigating, the House claimed, later adding that even if this case is not resolved in time for a House vote on impeachment, the need for prompt resolution of this case would remain critical given that the House Managers could potentially make use of McGahns testimony in the event of a subsequent trial in the Senate.
<snip>
Unlike in Miers, McGahns testimony is relevant to an urgent impeachment inquiry, the House said Tuesday evening.
As the Committee has previously described, the Mueller Report made clear that McGahn has important information concerning President Donald J. Trumps misconduct, the filing said. The Committee has been vigorously trying to obtain this information, which is of significant relevance to the Houses ongoing impeachment investigation.
Read more: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/house-oppose-mcgahn-stay-request
mopinko
(70,069 posts)getagrip_already
(14,685 posts)How likely is it that the judge wouldn't issue a stay knowing that an appeal is underway?
Does that happen?
BigmanPigman
(51,582 posts)"Former White House counsel Don McGahn gets temporary pause on testimony from judge"
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142401147