Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tom Yossarian Joad

(19,227 posts)
Mon Mar 2, 2020, 04:12 PM Mar 2020

A Trump Insider Embeds Climate Denial in Scientific Research

Source: NYT

An official at the Interior Department embarked on a campaign that has inserted misleading language about climate change — including debunked claims that increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is beneficial — into the agency’s scientific reports, according to documents reviewed by The New York Times.

The misleading language appears in at least nine reports, including environmental studies and impact statements on major watersheds in the American West that could be used to justify allocating increasingly scarce water to farmers at the expense of wildlife conservation and fisheries.

The effort was led by Indur M. Goklany, a longtime Interior Department employee who, in 2017 near the start of the Trump administration, was promoted to the office of the deputy secretary with responsibility for reviewing the agency’s climate policies. The Interior Department’s scientific work is the basis for critical decisions about water and mineral rights affecting millions of Americans and hundreds of millions of acres of land.

The wording, known internally as the “Goks uncertainty language” based on Mr. Goklany’s nickname, inaccurately claims that there is a lack of consensus among scientists that the earth is warming. In Interior Department emails to scientists, Mr. Goklany pushed misleading interpretations of climate science, saying it “may be overestimating the rate of global warming, for whatever reason;” climate modeling has largely predicted global warming accurately. The final language states inaccurately that some studies have found the earth to be warming, while others have not. /snip

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/02/climate/goks-uncertainty-language-interior.html?referringSource=articleShare

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Trump Insider Embeds Climate Denial in Scientific Research (Original Post) Tom Yossarian Joad Mar 2020 OP
Promoted by tRump. History will not be kind to tRump, to say the least. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2020 #1
If there is still history... Newest Reality Mar 2020 #2
Unfortunately none of them care about what history will say about them Perseus Mar 2020 #3
Their children will know. And suffer climate change. They don't care about their children either. nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2020 #5
If CO2 is so good for you Mr. Goklanky... lets cool down a pool lapfog_1 Mar 2020 #4

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)
2. If there is still history...
Mon Mar 2, 2020, 04:39 PM
Mar 2020

If he continues, the Party will take charge of history and make it into anything they want it to be. The past then becomes a mutable tool for control. The move towards the digital conveyance of information and storage makes that a very easy task that would put Winston Smith out of work quickly at MiniTrue.

"Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past." - 1984, George Orwell.
 

Perseus

(4,341 posts)
3. Unfortunately none of them care about what history will say about them
Mon Mar 2, 2020, 04:41 PM
Mar 2020

Criminals do not have any sense of consequences, if it fits their goals then its OK to them. They are only worried in the here and now.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»A Trump Insider Embeds Cl...