Elizabeth Warren, Once a Front-Runner, Will Drop Out of Presidential Race
Source: New York Times
BOSTON Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts plans to drop out of the presidential race on Thursday and will inform her staff of her plans later this morning, according to a person close to her, ending a run defined by an avalanche of policy plans that aimed to pull the Democratic Party to the left and appealed to enough voters to make her briefly a front-runner last fall, but that proved unable to translate excitement from elite progressives into backing from the partys more working-class and diverse base.
Though her support had eroded by Super Tuesday, in her final weeks as a candidate she effectively drove the centrist billionaire, former New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, out of the race with debate performances that flashed her evident skills and political potential.
She entered the race railing against the corrosive power of big money, and one long-term consequence of her campaign is that Ms. Warren demonstrated that someone other than Senator Bernie Sanders, and his intensely loyal small-dollar donors, could fund a credible presidential campaign without holding fund-raisers.
Her potential endorsement is highly sought after in the race and both Mr. Sanders and former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. have spoken with Ms. Warren since Super Tuesday, when the end of her campaign appeared imminent.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/05/us/politics/elizabeth-warren-drops-out.html?action=click&module=Alert&pgtype=Homepage
Farmer-Rick
(10,154 posts)I really liked her and we need a liberal female president.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)WTH?
Who ever calls 'Joe' that?
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)WTH?
Who ever calls 'Joe' that?
CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)It's a shame though about Sen. Warren. The first time I heard her speak, I thought about her being president (and she wasn't in politics yet).
I'm switching to Joe.
iscooterliberally
(2,860 posts)Love it!
Canoe52
(2,948 posts)Phoenix61
(17,000 posts)I think 2 old white people sets the wrong tone. President is the only prize worth losing a senate seat to a Republican, she should not give up her seat.
I still think Senator Harris is his best choice.
groundloop
(11,518 posts)The governor of Massachusetts is a republican, so he'd undoubtedly appoint a republican to fill the Senate seat which Warren would vacate. As great as she'd be I don't think anyone would want to lose a Senate seat.
IMO Biden/Harris would be a great ticket.
tclambert
(11,085 posts)It might give him a good chance to win the state of Texas. Trump cannot win without Texas.
Warren gives him help in Massachusetts, where he doesn't need help, and might cost us her Senate seat.
Kamal Harris is mentioned a lot. Helps him with women and minorities, but California is not a battleground state.
Traditionally, you want to pick a VP candidate from a battleground state to get a little extra support in that state..
TexasTowelie
(112,102 posts)We are putting too much emphasis on winning back the Rust Belt states while increasing the odds of taking Texas provides an alternative pathway to win the election.
Phoenix61
(17,000 posts)Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)I voted for her on Super Tuesday.
But just switched by preference on DU to Biden.
Initech
(100,063 posts)The road to the convention is going to be very interesting.
efhmc
(14,725 posts)I hope our Dem candidate picks one of the great women we have in our party as "his" vp.
maxsolomon
(33,310 posts)Or was it 78 year old Sander's refusal to step aside after his heart attack?
Sander's ego split the left. The African-American vote never left Biden.
efhmc
(14,725 posts)However, do you think any woman would have been able to continue after such a health issue? She would have been destroyed by the media and her opponents. Remember Hillary's "deadly illnesses"?
deurbano
(2,894 posts)among Sanders' followers--who are often indistinguishable from MAGAts) found even her cough disqualifying (since no other candidates ever lose their voices), and then that almost-faint (due to standing in the hot sun in combination with having pneumonia--which I contracted when I was 40) sent them (and the Russian bots) into a frenzied, shit show. Where was any of that when Sanders had the heart attack at 78, hid it for three days, then refused to provide the more detailed medical records he'd promised? Sanders was also a deadbeat dad with other things in his past that no female candidate could ever have in hers, since a woman's personal history warrants the fine-tooth comb treatment and no mercy.
deurbano
(2,894 posts)displayed the same Mommy issues that were so attractive in their attacks on HRC. The kind of attacks where it's hard to tell them from MAGAts. "Not Me. Us." (Right,)
Polybius
(15,381 posts)It was a super-mild heart attack, and Bernie honestly thought he could win. The left just preferred Bernie in this primary.
maxsolomon
(33,310 posts)But I am DU's foremost Ageist.
Polybius
(15,381 posts)Do you think 82 year old Bernie runs in '24? Or 75 year old Warren?
maxsolomon
(33,310 posts)No.
IronLionZion
(45,426 posts)so if misogyny is the reason, it's our voters doing it
OnlinePoker
(5,719 posts)To claim misogyny just because she lost isn't shown by the fact she didn't garner more than minor support from women, either.
efhmc
(14,725 posts)who strive to get rid of DJT and almost to a person this group of Hillary supporters said we need a male at the head of the ticket because of, not our party's misogyny but of our country's. I as most of the group voted for Biden in Texas for this reason not because of his type of reproductive organs but because he has the best chance of winning, which probably sadly has a great deal to do with his being a male
maxsolomon
(33,310 posts)Women collectively assuming men were worse than they are, and voting in anticipation of that.
deurbano
(2,894 posts)again, and for good reason. That year, we had the choice between the woman in the country most qualified to be president and that thing (whatever it is)... and we got that thing. Since being the most prepared, the smartest, the most qualified, the hardest working (etc., ad nauseam) didn't make the difference last time, what would? MANY women I know (in real life and online) are voting based on who they think is "electable" because we can't afford to get this one wrong. And so far, for the entire history of our nation, being electable has meant being male. We were sure we were going to break that glass ceiling in 2016, but that dream turned into our current nightmare, leaving many women (and men) unable to trust that their fellow voters will vote for a woman--even if she is a thousand times more qualified than the Head MAGAt-- because of, yes... misogyny. I mean, I voted for Warren because that kind of thinking becomes self-fulfilling, but I certainly can't blame anyone for coming to that conclusion, based on existing evidence. Also... in recent days, quite a few moved from Warren to Biden (when it seemed Sanders might get a plurality in the primary) because they can't stand Sanders/or find him unelectable (for ideological and other reasons) in the general.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Honestly, I don't know how any of these candidates do it.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)Joe gets stuff done, and Warren is an amazing strategist and tactician. The ticket will unify the center and left sides of the party, thereby expanding the coalition.
The drawback would be Massachusetts republican governor appointing her replacement.
Lulu KC
(2,565 posts)????
After they've all read it in the paper?
Why, NYT, why?
McKim
(2,412 posts)We need no further proof that this is not a rational country! I am very very sad that this super competent woman was not the first choice for so many! We are so fortunate that someone of her caliber would make the effort to run for president.
Maeve
(42,279 posts)The silver lining in this announcement--she will continue her work there!
KPN
(15,642 posts)part at this point in time, especially not endorsing one of the two remaining immediately. Hope she runs again in 2024.
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)She ran a damn good race and she brought some great ideas and more importantly, solutions to the discussion.
Job well done, Senator Warren. I hope the next President will seek your counsel and advice often in whatever role you wish to play.
PRETZEL
(3,245 posts)totally agree with this.
benld74
(9,904 posts)my daughters lifetimes.
They are 27 & 18
Fiendish Thingy
(15,578 posts)Tough, sharp, fighting against corruption. Together, she and Pelosi can ensure the next Dem presidents agenda gets enacted, and the corruption of this administration gets investigated.
deurbano
(2,894 posts)into the effort to take back the Senate. Can you imagine her working with Speaker Pelosi and Biden?!!!
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,393 posts)Bayard
(22,057 posts)I like Senator Warren a lot, and certainly respect her persistence.
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)Blue No Matter Who....
Maxheader
(4,372 posts)to the new democrat administration..
Lulu KC
(2,565 posts)with house, senate, and president all on more or less the same page, and the power to bring her plans to fruition.
I am seeing a happy ending, as long as November is a real election.
RinconDem
(1 post)I can't believe it. I'm just so saddened by it.
xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)"Elite progressive" now because I supported an intelligent, accomplished woman. And now the ONLY thing she has going for her is an endorsement?
Right there it is, why women in politics are not treated with respect they deserve. And the NYT wants me to subscribe? HA!
maxsolomon
(33,310 posts)Every reporter at the NYT isn't going to confirm your biases.
Are you a professional with an advanced degree? I am. That puts us in an "elite" of the highly educated with specialized knowledge and abilities, the way professional athletes are an elite in their field. Everyone can play soccer, but to get paid to do it? You're elite.
Snip: "Ms. Warren struggled to win over voters beyond college-educated white people, in particular white women. She was poised to win delegates in only a handful of highly educated enclaves: places like San Francisco, Santa Monica and West Hollywood."
This is always an issue in Liberal politics. Just ask Adlai Stevenson.