Coronavirus: Ohio polls will close as a health emergency
Source: Dayton Daily News
COLUMBUS -- Ohio's polls will be closed Tuesday as a health emergency, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine announced late Monday after Franklin County Common Pleas Court Judge Richard Frye on Monday night denied a request to delay the March 17 primary election to June 2.
The ruling, barring a last minute appeal, meant the election was slated to move forward with the polls opening at 6:30 a.m.
"During this time when we face an unprecedented public health crisis, to conduct an election tomorrow would force poll workers and voters to place themselves at a unacceptable health risk of contracting coronavirus. As such, Health Director Dr. Amy Acton will order the polls closed as a health emergency. While the polls will be closed tomorrow, Secretary of State Frank LaRose will seek a remedy through the courts to extend voting options so that every voter who wants to vote will be granted that opportunity," DeWine stated.
DeWine and LaRose earlier Monday night issued a statement after the judge's ruling, saying going forward with the election puts voters and poll workers over 65 and those with health issues at risk of being exposed to coronavirus.
Read more: https://www.daytondailynews.com/news/local/coronavirus-dewine-acton-give-updates-efforts-slow-virus/QxFijmWJLveYSolplq8c5I/
Yes, you read that correctly. No, I have no idea what it means. Article updated at 9:36 P.M. EDT.
DonaldsRump
(7,715 posts)cstanleytech
(26,284 posts)sandensea
(21,624 posts)wnylib
(21,433 posts)reACTIONary
(5,770 posts)wnylib
(21,433 posts)But I like the sound of it. Hammers it home.
denem
(11,045 posts)It's cancelled. DeWine is ignoring the court and election is cancelled due to public health emergency.
https://www.nbc4i.com/news/state-news/dewine-postpones-in-person-voting-for-primary-until-june-2/
TwilightZone
(25,467 posts)As noted in the article. He's basically ignoring the ruling.
spooky3
(34,441 posts)DeWine is defying the judge's order.
https://www.dispatch.com/
"After 10 p.m. it was announced that Dr. Acton would be issuing the public health order."
https://www.daytondailynews.com/news/local/coronavirus-dewine-acton-give-updates-efforts-slow-virus/QxFijmWJLveYSolplq8c5I/
dchill
(38,474 posts)jimfields33
(15,786 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)Of course we are going to starve to death then.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,013 posts)jimfields33
(15,786 posts)Democratic voters go to vote and pass it to republicans? Maybe his thinking. But really its numbers only hes worried about.
spooky3
(34,441 posts)The primary. Why didnt DeWine convene the general assembly, as required by law? Hes know about the virus for weeks.
Also: Why did an email go out to polls workers, telling them not to show up tomorrow, before the judge had even made a decision?
onenote
(42,700 posts)Since you're the one that wants to force at-risk people to choose between being disenfranchised by not voting or ignoring the clear advice of the experts that they should be staying home.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,013 posts)Governor keeps factories open, shuts voting down:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1287672952
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,013 posts)jimfields33
(15,786 posts)atreides1
(16,076 posts)Then June becomes August...then October...then "we can't allow elections, because of a health emergency"...
jimfields33
(15,786 posts)What is your preference?
treestar
(82,383 posts)People could keep their distance. Voting is important.
treestar
(82,383 posts)they may postpone it again.
At least they can't do this with the General.
MarcA
(2,195 posts)Response to OilemFirchen (Original post)
we can do it This message was self-deleted by its author.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Do you not get it? They are ignoring the court.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)DeWine is defying the court order.
dchill
(38,474 posts)kairos12
(12,857 posts)Calista241
(5,586 posts)The 20th amendment is explicit and clear:
Section 1. The terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin.
Section 3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.
treestar
(82,383 posts)that might be OK - since the other changes there can't be a VP without a P. That leaves the new Congress to decide. So it's extremely important that we not let the Rs take Congress.
Raven123
(4,829 posts)onenote
(42,700 posts)And the election will eventually go forward, so how does delaying it "disenfranchise" anyone?
dware
(12,369 posts)People are freaking out over nothing, as you say, it's only a delay, there is no "disenfranchise".
LisaL
(44,973 posts)DeWine couldn't do it legally, court didn't allow it. I have no clue what will happen.
spooky3
(34,441 posts)Be better then. Why not convene the general assembly to allow mail in votes after tomorrow, AND hold the polls open, with poll workers in low risk groups?
Raven123
(4,829 posts)Actually I agree with delaying the election. I do hope those of us who favor common sense gun laws will rememberer this moment once this pandemic has passed. The strict constructionist GOP claims that the Constitution guarantees anyone can own as many guns of any type they want. Well... the Ohio state constitution prohibits delaying an election unless the state is being invaded. Thats what got DeWine in this bind. He wanted to delay, but felt constrained so he punted to the courts. Kudos to the judge who forced this to the Supreme Court. Constitutions and constitutional remedies cannot always rise to the urgency of the moment.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Raven123
(4,829 posts)Actually DeWine quipped that point in his presser, but decided against it. Punted to the courts.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Election is cancelled any way for health emergency.
I am very curious as to what will happen now, considering I didn't get to vote.
DeWine didn't have the authority to postpone the election. I am assuming he still doesn't. But election is cancelled.
What is the mechanism for having a different date for it?
atreides1
(16,076 posts)How long will they "delay" it for? If their "experts" keep singing the same tune...this "delay" could be permanent!
Raven123
(4,829 posts)Coventina
(27,107 posts)I don't.
I don't care what the excuse is.
Republicans are morally bankrupt. It can't possibly be about public health.
onenote
(42,700 posts)to choose between ignoring the clear advice they've been given to stay at home and going out to cast their votes for Joe.
Having the election tomorrow will disenfranchise many people who are following the advice they've been given to stay sequestered.
But some folks here seem to thing that listening and following expert advice is a bad thing.
Coventina
(27,107 posts)Republican's so-called "concern" for Democratic voters.
orleans
(34,051 posts)"After 10 p.m. it was announced that Dr. Acton would be issuing the public health order."
Igel
(35,300 posts)And out-and-out ridiculed the Iranian government for their glorious GOTV drive for an election during an epidemic.
Or was I imagining things?
PatrickforO
(14,570 posts)weeks to vote and then can drop them off in a sealed dropoff box.
That's how my state does it.
Maeve
(42,281 posts)Early Tuesday, the Ohio Supreme Court denied a legal challenge to the state delaying the primary. A candidate in Wood County filed the action alleging the delay of the primary violated election laws.
Only four justices participated in the ruling, which was issued without an opinion.
The ruling capped a chaotic 12 hours in which it appeared the election was off, back on, and then off again.
https://www.dispatch.com/news/20200316/coronavirus-ohio-supreme-court-allows-delay-to-primary-election
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Legally, DeWine doesn't have the authority to postpone the election.
Legally, secretary of state will now have to go to court to try and have it moved.
Legally, court didn't order it cancelled so will it agree to have it moved?
I am far from convinced OH will have the primary.
Maeve
(42,281 posts)And technically, it wasn't DeWine stopping things, it was the Dept. of Health.
But it's not JUST a primary--there are other issues on the ballot, so there are things that have to be resolved on local levels. We usually don't have the primary until May--so it's not unusual for us to have little say in the choice of national candidates. This year was supposed to be different.
As for the final choice, I think the legislature may come back into session and sort the whole thing out now that there is some time to do so. The health crisis hit suddenly (yeah, we knew it was coming, but...)and the normal channels just couldn't cope with it.
treestar
(82,383 posts)OMG what a way to describe the vote. We have the RIGHT to vote. We are not "granted the opportunity."
machoneman
(4,006 posts)harley_weewax
(10 posts)My husband and I are both in our 70's, and he is in the high risk category. I'm a lifelong Democrat, and my husband saw the light 20 years ago. While we did not vote for Mike DeWine and don't agree with many of his policies, we find his hands-on, listen to the experts approach to be something that the entire country could use. Yes, we need to have the primaries, and postponed is better than cancelled. The virus is most deadly for seniors and those at high risk. Our schools and universities are closed, nursing homes and hospitals have visitor restrictions, and restaurants and bars are now carryout/delivery only. An ounce of prevention now will assure that more of us will be around to vote in the important election in November.
Our Democratic party has weighed in:
Ohio Democratic Party Statement on Governors Recommendation to Postpone Primary Election Day
MARCH 16, COLUMBUS The Ohio Democratic Party released the following statement from Chairman David Pepper in response to Gov. Mike DeWines recommendation that the state postpone in-person voting for the primary election until Tuesday, June 2:
Dr. Amy Acton and Gov. Mike DeWine shared their conclusion with me that the risk to voters, 35,000 poll workers, volunteers and the broader public through additional spread was too great to conduct in-person voting tomorrow. In deference to their expertise on this critical health crisis, I support that decision regarding in-person voting tomorrow.
Extending an election is an unprecedented step, so we as a party are weighing alternatives on how to best do so including the possibility to conduct the primary election entirely by vote-by-mail, as is done in several other states, with a deadline much earlier than June 2. This could better serve the interests of Ohio voters and the primary process that is already well underway, and we will consider offering those alternatives to the court once the case is filed.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)DeWine had no authority to cancel the election or postpone the election.
So now courts will have to rule if election can be held at another date.
I don't know what the courts will rule.
So I don't know if I will get to vote.
harley_weewax
(10 posts)The Ohio Supreme Court has already ruled against the first lawsuit against the postponement so it appears to be moving fast. There are three other states who postponed today's vote also. Fasten your seat belts.....
Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,752 posts)worker over 65 I would NOT be too vain to wear these!!!! Then take a good shower when you get home.
Anyone at serious risk who feels differently - stay home and let other people take care of it. One good thing Im seeing at least in my neck of the woods - people stepping up to the plate and helping out as they can.
Marthe48
(16,945 posts)whether or not the circumstances warranted his actions, this set a precedence for ignoring the courts and delaying of canceling elections.
I know the primary is reset for June 2, but dewine overstepped his legal authority, and more erosion of the our rule of law. gdi
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Secretary of state will have to go to court to reset anything.
Marthe48
(16,945 posts)this is dangerous. A slippery slope.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Dummy Don "canceling" the election. If the virus is still around in November, wonder what could happen? Hopefully, since they are run by states, the blue states will hold theirs regardless and that forces the red states to do it.
djg21
(1,803 posts)I havent been able to find it.
Unless you have read it, there is no basis to criticize. Media reports indicate that the Court declined to issue injunctive relief ordering that the primary be postponed because the question is a political one best left to elected officials and the States legislature, and in essence presents a separation of powers issue. If this is correct, it doesnt foreclose the elected officials or legislature from actually deciding to postpone the primary. The Court just didnt want to usurp the authority of the elected officials or legislature.
People on DU are often quick to jump to conclusions without investigating the facts, and without having a basis for their stated opinions. There is no conspiracy here, and no one is being deprived of a vote, as the primary will take place at a later date. Hopefully, the ability for more to vote by mail will be enhanced in the interim.
To level set, we are at the very onset of a public health emergency, and it makes absolutely no sense to go forward with primaries when the only even remotely way to prevent more widespread transmission of the Trump Plague is to engage in social distancing. Putting off the primary was the responsible thing to do.
Marthe48
(16,945 posts)the way this was done. Slippery slope. I bet that the Supreme Court wouldn't say they won't use this as a precedent (as they did in bush v. Gore for 2000 decision)
djg21
(1,803 posts)The court seems to have held that this is a political question not to be resolved by a court, but rather by elected State officials and the State legislature. SCOTUS would not rely on a low level trial court for precedent. It wouldnt have to. There are numerous SCOTUS cases addressing the issue of justiciability and political questions in federal courts. See, http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/politicalquestions.html https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43834.pdf. The precedent already is there.