Fauci, Navarro got into heated argument over unproven COVID-19 treatment: report
Source: The Hill
Anthony Fauci, the nation's top infectious disease expert, reportedly clashed recently with White House trade official Peter Navarro over the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine and its use as a possible treatment for COVID-19.
During a meeting Saturday first reported by Axios, Navarro reportedly accused Fauci of opposing the administration's temporary ban on travel from China after Fauci cautioned against the administration promoting the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat the coronavirus.
"You were the one who early on objected to the travel restrictions with China," Navarro reportedly said to Fauci.
There's no evidence Fauci has ever publicly criticized the administration's approach to travel from China amid the outbreak, and on March 12, Fauci praised such a policy during a press briefing.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/fauci-navarro-got-into-heated-argument-over-unproven-covid-19-treatment-report/ar-BB12cuQj?li=BBnb7Kz
So, the trade official decided to tell of Fauci because Fauci keeps on insisting on facts and science? Trump does not care if it works or is effective. The key thing is that he has a story to sell sort of like Trump University. Who cares if it teaches you squat? Likewise, why not sell a miracle cure like his buddy Alex Jones.
dalton99a
(81,406 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)a medical person nor a expert in viruses, and yet Dr. Fauci will be ousted.
That is where the administration is. Incompetence.
C_U_L8R
(44,992 posts)Everything Trump says is a lie.
BootinUp
(47,094 posts)jstephenj
(51 posts)And if so, is it possible for Fauci and others (assuming he is eventually dismissed by Trump) defect as an unofficial liason?
calimary
(81,127 posts)Yes, he has. I think there are six of them. One is Dr. Zeke Emanuel who's on MSNBC all the time now as a medical specialist.
reACTIONary
(5,768 posts)Response to jstephenj (Reply #5)
Name removed Message auto-removed
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)He is being sensible and keeping personal politics out of the situation where he needs to be taken seriously by everyone. If he starts in with politics, then hard core Republicans will disregard anything he has ever said.
This is a pandemic - science must come before politics. He is a scientist in this position, not a representative of any political party.
marble falls
(57,014 posts)Blue Owl
(50,291 posts)Then stay the hell away from it.
catsudon
(839 posts)BUT this narrative is now being pushed by our own people
https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2020/04/06/democrat-karen-whitsett-coronavirus-hydroxychloroquine-trump/2955430001/
duforsure
(11,885 posts)It almost always involves making money for trump behind it. Follow the money and it'll likely expose him for it.
Maxheader
(4,370 posts)Sure fire way into stumpy's inner circle..
I hope it follows them the rest of their lives..
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
elocs This message was self-deleted by its author.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,319 posts)By Chandelis Duster, CNN
Updated 10:12 AM ET, Mon April 6, 2020
Washington (CNN) -- White House trade adviser Peter Navarro on Monday said he was qualified to engage and disagree with Dr. Anthony Fauci on the use of an anti-malarial drug as a coronavirus treatment -- which is not yet proven as effective -- saying, "I'm a social scientist."
"Doctors disagree about things all the time. My qualifications in terms of looking at the science is that I'm a social scientist," he told CNN's John Berman on "New Day." "I have a Ph.D. And I understand how to read statistical studies, whether it's in medicine, the law, economics or whatever."
Navarro's remarks follow reports that he clashed with officials in the Situation Room over the weekend about the unproven efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in treating coronavirus. While the task force was discussing the latest on the anti-malaria drug, an exasperated Navarro lashed out at Fauci, the nation's top infectious disease expert, who has urged caution around the drug, a person familiar with the meeting told CNN.
Navarro had brought a stack of paperwork about the drug with him into the room, arguing it was proof that it could work to treat coronavirus, which Fauci disagreed with because it was not data.
Axios first reported on the disagreement inside the White House about the drug.
{snip}
ThoughtCriminal
(14,047 posts)A "Social Scientist" with a PhD should understand sampling size and control groups.
He needs to go back to school.
patphil
(6,150 posts)He's advocating the use of an unproven drug because he wants it to be an effective treatment, not because it is.
All he really wants is to open up the economy again. Nothing else matters to him, including the health and safety of the people he would have use this drug.
BrightKnight
(3,567 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)These mooks have been the people running the show the last three years