New York cancels presidential primary, angering Bernie Sanders supporters
Source: Democrat & Chronicle
ALBANY New York has cancelled its Democratic presidential primary for 2020, angering Bernie Sanders supporters who were hoping to win more delegates to influence their party's platform.
The state's Democratic election commissioners voted Monday to remove Sanders and nine other presidential candidates from the New York ballot, making use of a new measure in state law allowing them to do so if a candidate publicly suspends his or her campaign.
The move left former Vice President Joe Biden the lone remaining Democrat actively seeking the Democratic nomination as the only name on New York's Democratic primary ballot, effectively canceling the primary.
The primary election had originally been scheduled for Tuesday before Gov. Andrew Cuomo delayed it to June 23 in response to the coronavirus pandemic, which has hit New York harder than any other state.
(snip)
Read more: https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/politics/albany/2020/04/27/ny-cancels-presidential-primary-angering-bernie-sanders-supporters/3032725001/
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,609 posts)jimfields33
(15,703 posts)Historic NY
(37,449 posts)unless there was another Republican running against him..Republicans canceled theirs too. It will be on the General Election ballot in Nov.
Cuomo has also ordered the Board of Elections to mail an application for an absentee ballot to all eligible voters for the remaining state, local and congressional primaries June 23.
jimfields33
(15,703 posts)Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)This is going to just cause even more conspiracy theories encouraging Dems not to vote in November
Squinch
(50,918 posts)Ninga
(8,272 posts)voters you speak of, but perhaps they not not real Dems.
moonscape
(4,673 posts)the middle of a pandemic and what NY is going through ... was not going to vote in Nov anyway, or at least not for Biden.
djg21
(1,803 posts)Whoever is the Democratic nominee in other words VP Biden will win the General in NYS, and hence NYSs electors, without any effort and by a landslide, and irrespective of any Bernie supporters who may decide to not vote, or vote for a 3rd part candidate, or write in Sanders, or otherwise try to re-elect Trump.
moonscape
(4,673 posts)still_one
(92,061 posts)TwilightZone
(25,428 posts)There's nothing to conspire.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)It shouldn't be called a conspiracy, but Sanders was behind the change to the DNC rule that's biting him now, in addition to NY's move. It's likely he thought it'd benefit him as he continued to the end in 2020, picking up reallocated delegates from others who dropped out and were no longer able to influence the allocation of their delegates to another candidate of similar ideology.
George II
(67,782 posts)we can do it
(12,173 posts)usaf-vet
(6,163 posts)Renew Deal
(81,847 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Voters in about 20 counties that had no other contests on their ballot have no need to go to the polls, and endanger lives on June 23.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)hardest hit by this fucking virus. Bernie did the right thing, conceded and supports Biden. It's all good. We're all good here.
EllieBC
(2,990 posts)If there's that much tinfoil, maybe stop a minute and think.
relayerbob
(6,537 posts)deserve IQ45 as President.
The rest of us don't
LakeArenal
(28,806 posts)Bernie has endorsed Joe.
Sanders supporters are upset with him and taking it out on Democrats.
Real Democrats will vote. Fake Democrats probably wont no matter how many primaries we go through.
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)BigDemVoter
(4,149 posts)Nothing else needs to be said. I don't see how there is anything to be gained or argued over. Sanders is no longer in the race.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)JohnQFunk
(408 posts)Iggo
(47,535 posts)There ain't no kind of Democratic voter that's fucking stupid enough to sit out the election this November.
And if they tell you they are gonna sit it out, they were never going to vote anyway.
Don't help them depress the vote.
leftieNanner
(15,067 posts)Local races? Congressional? It doesn't make any sense to cancel just the Presidential one if that means that fewer people will vote for the local issues.
jimfields33
(15,703 posts)Igel
(35,275 posts)there'll still be polls and voters going out to vote--or the mail-in thing where the USPS achieves its usual efficiency of 100% delivered on time to the correct address.
The only savings here would be a small amount of ink and the reduced voter turnout.
Strange. I guess it does mean less money campaigning against one of your own, though. And effectively means that a suspended campaign can't be revived--or that Sanders can't accrue more delegates that could create a problem later on for Biden.
jimfields33
(15,703 posts)I sorta get it but had they instead gone only vote by mail primary would have given them an opportunity to see where the kinks are for November had they gone that direction. The states can do whatever they want so had I been in charge I would definitely gone a vote by mail primary. It would have been valuable in case November goes vote by mail nationwide.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)pnwmom
(108,959 posts)won't have to work.
Demsrule86
(68,469 posts)leftieNanner
(15,067 posts)That makes sense.
Demsrule86
(68,469 posts)not be the nominee under any scenario.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)The ones that do not, will not, saving much money and potentially lives of people.
The Wisconsin fiasco is one that we don't want to repeat.
The NY BOE was given the authority to remove candidates who suspended their campaign from the ballot on April 2. Bernie suspended on April 8.
From the article:
Jay Jacobs, the New York Democratic chairman, said he supports the decision to cancel the primary, saying it's in the best interest for the public health. Many poll workers are senior citizens who are particularly vulnerable to the coronavirus, he noted.
It would have been a different story if Sanders were still actively seeking the Democratic nomination, Jacobs said.
They have the authority to cancel a primary where there is only one person on the ballot. In a pandemic, in a state which is a hot spot, that is a wise decision in terms of public health.
Those calling it "dismantling democracy" are as mistaken as those calling recent bans on gatherings of over 10 people "a violation of the right to assemble."
It's about way more than "a little ink," it's about public health taking precedence over a former candidate's wish for validation. That candidate will not gain any further "influence" over the platform should this primary take place, and certainly has much to lose by not telling his supporters that public health comes first, and he supports that.
EarthFirst
(2,899 posts)Im sure Ill take a hit on this comment; Im behind Biden in the general election; however stripping down the process is not acceptable.
New York should have used this opportunity to demonstrate how 100% mail balloting is a viable method to the rest of the nation; White House.
George II
(67,782 posts)....what's the point?
still_one
(92,061 posts)My understanding is they are just removing the Democratic Presidential primary because there is only one candidate as you said George, and that makes sense, especially since Sanders has dropped out and endorsed Biden
George II
(67,782 posts)It's pointless to hold primaries in those 20 counties for essentially no reason.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)shouldn't the other two dozen or so candidates who also dropped out get to be on it too? They also have supporters who should get the same chance as you to vote for someone who's not running. Whatever that is.
George II
(67,782 posts)...who were also removed from the ballot:
Michael Bloomberg
Pete Buttigieg
Tulsi Gabbard
Amy Klobuchar
Deval Patrick
Tom Steyer
Elizabeth Warren
Andrew Yang
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)aggressively hostile candidates who cynically claim to be victimized by their opponents than if they behaved honorably.
That's reality-based SOP for Republicans and for populist leaders on both the left and right. Further, failure to come through angers and alienates antagonistic supporters who expect their leaders to take their attitudes to the national spotlight.
Wouldn't want that, and here it is. Doesn't matter that this was a NY decision, not a DNC or Biden decision. Or that the Biden campaign is negotiating with Sanders to keep the new rules Sanders helped create from paring away all the delegates they would if simply applied the way Sanders presumably had intended.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,609 posts)Anyhow, stripping down a process when the process is meaningless - and continuing with it would cost millions of dollars that the state really can't afford now - is the right thing to do. Bernie and the bros are just playing games right now, and those are games we can't afford either financially or politically.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)If there wasn't a pandemic, letting Sanders supporters in NY get that chance to feel good about checking his name off would make more sense. But there is a pandemic, and going forward with an "election" in 20 counties with only candidate on the ballot is irresponsible from a public health perspective. The sort of reaction that's reported in the OP is not very different than those protests to lift stay at home orders before public health officials say it's safe.
There is no challenger to Biden. There is no point to endangering lives so some other candidate's supporters can feel better about not liking the winner.
George II
(67,782 posts)Funny how that works.
I can just imagine what's being said on Twitter.
LeftInTX
(25,141 posts)If a candidate drops out before the deadline, they are not on the ballot.
niyad
(113,076 posts)Tarc
(10,472 posts)What about the basic landlords?
Tarheel_Dem
(31,222 posts)begging Washington for support for basic services such as police, teachers, first responders, etc. As much as some would like to believe it, I'm sure this move has absolutely nothing to do with Bernie Sanders, or his supporters.
Demsrule86
(68,469 posts)Bengus81
(6,928 posts)According to his em..."bro's".
KPN
(15,637 posts)Couldn't help but notice.
Sloumeau
(2,657 posts)Galraedia
(5,020 posts)The move was supposedly done to get AOL away from using Microsoft's Internet Explorer in their AOL browser. However, they continued to use Internet Explorer and didn't do much with Netscape beyond offering a low cost dial-up internet service under the Netscape brand.
Bengus81
(6,928 posts)Just mainly the forerunner of (Mozilla) FireFox which I've always used. I can't remember how many versions of Netscape I actually paid for. Seems like about $30 bucks a pop. And it and FireFox were always noticeable faster than IE. I've never used that browser.
Tried Opera a few times but eh.....
KPN
(15,637 posts)was that now? 17-18 years? Seems like yesterday and another life both at the same time.
Bengus81
(6,928 posts)With my Acer computer with a Pentium 90 CPU. Single core running at 90 Mhz. The computer I built for myself almost four years ago has a four core CPU and each of them run at 4 Ghz.
On Netscape I bought several newer versions as time passed and like I said I think they were about $30 each.
Demsrule86
(68,469 posts)Response to nitpicker (Original post)
snowybirdie This message was self-deleted by its author.
George II
(67,782 posts)Roy Rolling
(6,908 posts)Anti Democrat-Establishment Democrats want to hold a primary with all withdrawn candidates on the ballot
to lock in some portion of the party-guaranteed convention vote for the candidate who ran on the evils of the party mechanism.
Zoonart
(11,834 posts)I love in NYS and am thrilled that they called off this mess. We were having a very difficult time staffing up our polling stations before the pandemic hit and most of our poll workers are seniors.
quaint
(2,551 posts)Because of the boards decision, voters in about 20 counties that had no other contests on their ballot will have no need to go to the polls on June 23.
Despite arrangements to encourage absentee voting, polling places are expected to remain open in about 42 counties for down ballot races.
The New York Times
Maeve
(42,271 posts)Thank you, that was the important part!
whistler162
(11,155 posts)Vote for Mannion he will teach those Republicans something.
AlexSFCA
(6,137 posts)cancel convention also! Focus on general election. Biden should have VP announcement by now.
still_one
(92,061 posts)RandySF
(58,511 posts)seta1950
(932 posts)Bernie supporters are not happy, they have to complain, enough already, at this point none of us are sure of our future, lets just work to get Joe Biden in the White House otherwise nothings going to matter much, were all going to die.
rickford66
(5,521 posts)I'm in NY and would have no problem with it. It wouldn't change the outcome and Bernie would probably get more delegates than if the primary is held.
Renew Deal
(81,847 posts)So you're probably right, but Bernie dropped out. Why are we worried about his delicate sensibilities? Someone should ask him if he cares about this, because I doubt he does.
It would be more funny if NY awarded Trumps delegates to someone else, but the parties award delegates, not the state.
George II
(67,782 posts)....all of them split the delegates?
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)the Republicans canceled their primary. The would have been only 2 until Sanders dropped out.
The state's Democratic election commissioners voted Monday to remove Sanders and nine other presidential candidates from the New York ballot, making use of a new measure in state law allowing them to do so if a candidate publicly suspends his or her campaign.
Karma13612
(4,544 posts)comradebillyboy
(10,128 posts)jmowreader
(50,530 posts)He dropped out of the race and endorsed Biden. Why, precisely, should we give delegates to someone who isnt running for president anymore - and if we wanted to do that, why not give half the delegates to Amy Klobuchar or Pete Buttigieg, both of whom are also not candidates anymore but whom are actual Democrats?
Renew Deal
(81,847 posts)Historic NY
(37,449 posts)on the ballot. Its about not finding people to vote, but to find people to work the polls. The Nov ballot can take up those few elections in spots for other offices.
The state's Democratic election commissioners voted Monday to remove Sanders and nine other presidential candidates from the New York ballot, making use of a new measure in state law allowing them to do so if a candidate publicly suspends his or her campaign.
rickford66
(5,521 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)...of those endorsed Biden.
Supporters of only one ex-candidate are complaining about this sensible decision.
rickford66
(5,521 posts)The state's Democratic election commissioners voted Monday to remove Sanders and nine other presidential candidates from the New York ballot, making use of a new measure in state law allowing them to do so if a candidate publicly suspends his or her campaign.
He was voted off. There's a difference. I wasn't supporting him, but he did expect to earn delegates.
George II
(67,782 posts)....no differently than any of the other candidates of similar status.
Michael Bloomberg "suspended", was removed today, no complaints from anyone
Pete Buttigieg "suspended", was removed today, no complaints from anyone
Tulsi Gabbard "suspended", was removed today, no complaints from anyone
Amy Klobuchar "suspended", was removed today, no complaints from anyone
Deval Patrick "suspended", was removed today, no complaints from anyone
Tom Steyer "suspended", was removed today, no complaints from anyone
Elizabeth Warren "suspended", was removed today, no complaints from anyone
Andrew Yang "suspended", was removed today, no complaints from anyone
Bernie Sanders "suspended", was removed today, and everyone is upset about it.
What's up with that?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)He also committed to doing his best to elect Biden. But above all, like the other two dozen or so candidates who also withdrew, he's no longer a candidate for president.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)We are doing it in RI.
rpannier
(24,328 posts)State or Federal?
Aristus
(66,294 posts)This robs the Bernie-bots of the opportunity to complain that if Biden won, the DNC "rigged it."
👏🏼👏🏼
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Last edited Mon Apr 27, 2020, 05:54 PM - Edit history (1)
"The NY B.O.E. is doing this on the orders of the DNC."
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)it seems a bit impolitic to completely disregard Sanders supporters, and their (in my opinion) legitimate desire to have a say in the Dem Party platform.
If there is to be any hope of winning at least some of them over to turn out and vote for Biden, cancelling the primary seems, at the very least, unhelpful.
Disclaimer (in case it might be necessary): I am not now, nor was I ever, a Bernie Sanders supporter. My sole concern is whether or not any of them might be brought into the Biden fold.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)desires as well? Why are they not pitching a fit about this?
Why is it that only Sanders supporters who have a "legitimate desire" to "have a say in the party platform?"
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)are the only ones whose desires need to be taken seriously?
Sanders suspended his campaign after the law was passed that gave NY BOE the right to cancel an election if there is only one candidate in the race.
You stated that it was unwise to "ignore their desires."
"A provision in New Yorks new budget empowered the states board of elections to remove presidential candidates who have suspended their campaigns," so yes, they can remove him from the ballot, along with anyone else who has suspended their campaigns.
I feel that Sanders supporters would be crying foul if Biden and Biden supporters were demanding that the primary go on during a pandemic had Biden been the one to suspend his campaign, stating that Democrats had made their choice, and it would be irresponsible to endanger lives to cater to Biden's ambitions to get as many delegates as possible simply to dilute Bernie's influence over the platform.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)All I actually care about is whether we can bring at least some Sanders supporters on board with Biden, so they're not writing in Bernie or voting 3rd party.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)in order to do that?
Even if doing so involves needlessly endangering lives during a pandemic?
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Link to tweet
Democrats on the New York state Board of Elections decided Monday to cancel the party's presidential primary, which had already been pushed from April back to June 23 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. That leaves Sanders without a chance to grab any delegates in the state, despite his insistence on staying on the ballot to secure more standing within the party.
Sanders suspended his 2020 run last month and endorsed former Vice President Joe Biden, but still wanted his supporters to vote for him so his delegates could "exert significant influence over the party platform and other functions" at the Democratic National Convention. But Doug Kellner, one of the two Democratic commissioners on the elections board in New York, concluded Sanders' suspension "ended the real context for the primary election." "Joe Biden is the only candidate and therefore he is effectively the winner of the New York primary," Kellner said, so holding the primary would be "unnecessary and frivolous" during the coronavirus pandemic.
George II
(67,782 posts)...(including Sanders) suspended their campaigns.
People are acting like this was a "blow" only to Sanders, it's just common sense, particularly since more people are getting sick and dying in NYS than any other state.
still_one
(92,061 posts)LeftInTX
(25,141 posts)Is Texas 75 days?
I think Texas is 75 days...maybe NY is 90 days or something...
Beto and Kamala weren't on the ballot, but Julian (who dropped out on Jan 2 was)
Here is the sample ballot I handed out..LOL
o Amy Klobuchar
o Tom Steyer
o Julián Castro (dropped out)
o Elizabeth Warren
o Marianne Williamson (dropped out)
o Michael Bennet (dropped out)
o Cory Booker (dropped out)
o Andrew Yang (dropped out)
o Bernie Sanders
o Deval Patrick
o John K. Delaney (dropped out)
o Michael R. Bloomberg
o Tulsi Gabbard
o Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente
o Robby Wells
o Joseph R. Biden
o Pete Buttigieg
I think someone else dropped out and I was manually crossing his name out too....
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)campaigns from the ballot. Bernie withdrew April 8.
So they had that power to remove former candidates starting on April 3, and as such determined that there was only one person on the ballot from the time that Sanders suspended.
That gave them the authority to cancel any primary where there was only one candidate, and they did, due to public health concerns.
Cha
(296,868 posts)from their ballots.
Seems after he dropped out and Endorsed Joe Biden that he's the only one complaining about it, though.
TheFarseer
(9,317 posts)If Bernie picked off one more meaningless delegate, he could have pressured Biden to roll out MFA and forgive all student loan debt - yeah right. Find something else to do guys! Theres a lot of opportunity to make a difference out there.
brooklynite
(94,363 posts)Lee Zeldin's seat on LI and John Katko's seat upstate. Per Federal Court Order, these have to be held in June.
George II
(67,782 posts)...with this at least the voters of 20 counties don't have to vote either by mail-in or risk their health by going to the polls, not to mention the workers themselves (most of which are retirees)
MustLoveBeagles
(11,583 posts)It's over so why put New Yorkers at unnecessary risk. As for the hurt feelings, Boo-freaking-Hoo. Get over it already! Bernie has dropped out and endorsed Joe. I'm sure most of his supporters will support Joe in the fall.
Sloumeau
(2,657 posts)DinahMoeHum
(21,774 posts). . .therefore his name should NOT be on the ballot.
Note, too, that it is only the POTUS primary being affected here. All other federal, state and local primaries in New York will go on as scheduled for June 23.
#newrostrong
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)platform drafting."
I can just imagine what the reaction of Sanders supporters would be had Biden been the one to suspend his campaign, and wanted the NY delegates for the same reason....
"There is a PANDEMIC! The people MADE THEIR CHOICE. Joe WITHDREW and ENDORSED BERNIE!!! To hold this primary and risk lives would be IRRESPONSIBLE! Look what happened in Wisconsin when they tried to switch to mail in ballots!!! What is the POINT?"
Devil Child
(2,728 posts)TexasTowelie
(111,963 posts)people should risk their lives and the lives of those around them in a meaningless election.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....after a team sweeps the first four games.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)msongs
(67,361 posts)changed
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)I'll tell you why. Because come November it will be the clusterfuck Trump wants and needs.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)that was didn't work for him and contributed to his withdrawal from the race.
It's likely Sanders thought it'd benefit him next time as he continued to the end in 2020, picking up reallocated delegates from others who dropped out and were no longer able to influence the allocation of their delegates to another candidate of similar ideology and away from him.
He just didn't pick up enough under his new reallocation rule.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)It's my right. I will exercise it.
Thank you, to our Democratic Governor Gina Raimundo and Secretary of State Nellie Gorbea.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)since we have crooked election thief Brian Kemp for governor and GA's Republicans of course are grabbing every opportunity to try to sabotage and suppress the vote.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,325 posts)Democrats still came to vote in droves, mostly for Joe, but importantly for the Detroit tri-county area, there was a proposal on support for the Detroit Art Institute. If the primary had been canceled, the issue might have been pushed to the August primaries, where many more Republicans would be voting.
It was smart to put that arts-support issue on a predominantly Democratic primary. The three Republicans who bothered to vote (unanimously) for Trump were not enough to defeat the support.
Did NY have any proposals that have to be moved because of this cancellation?
Tarc
(10,472 posts)Demsrule86
(68,469 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Sanders suspended his campaign April 8.
This decision was not about "keeping Bernie down."
BigDemVoter
(4,149 posts)Just saying. . . . Sanders already endorsed Biden. . . If this were still a race, I would understand, but do we need to club this subject any further?
milestogo
(16,829 posts)It's not fair to have "early" states and states whose vote is too late to matter.
yellowdogintexas
(22,231 posts)Either that or two big primary days maybe 2 weeks apart. Get it out of the way and the presumptive winner could get a running start on everything.
honest.abe
(8,616 posts)The candidates would focus on the states with the most delegates like CA, NY, TX, FL, IL, PA. The smaller states and regions would be mostly ignored.
A better change would be some sort of groupings of states then have a "Super Tuesday" like primary every month from Feb to June.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)Right now it leads to NO REPRESENTATION for states that vote later.
honest.abe
(8,616 posts)Im not defending the current system.
Karma13612
(4,544 posts)One National Primary Day.
Heck, I was a Warren supporter. She was out well before I had the chance to vote for her, something I was dreaming of doing since 2016 when I hoped she would run. We are talking heart wrenching sadness. But it has had to be buried in light of Coronavirus.
Im a big girl, and know that this year is once again make or break for the soul of our country.
I am not stupid. With an open mind and a hopeful heart I will vote for Biden. And pray he wins.
BUT:
I live in a red area of New York. We NEVER get the Dem candidates to visit us. We never have an over abundance of ads to turns us purple or blue.
I have always wondered about these early states that get tons of attention with chances to meet the candidates in town halls and rope lines. Everyone says that they need some sort of retail politics to be willing to vote for a candidate.
For once, I wish someone would tell me the metric that decided which states are held by the hand and given access to the candidates, and which are left to just be happy to read news articles, watch a few ads and go to rallies without the candidates in attendance.
Sorry, I just get really angry about it and cant see how any candidate can blanket the nation and expect to have satisfied all their potential voters desires for personal attention, a townhall, a handshake or a selfie, even if they were given limitless time to campaign.
I have to do my homework. So can others.
honest.abe
(8,616 posts)It needs to be changed but a single day primary is also problematic as I explained previously.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)All others have suspended their campaigns and endorsed Biden.
The race is over.
There is only one candidate. I cant see running an election so a few loud people dont get their feelings hurt.
And these folks are always looking for reasons to feel like victims. Might as well give them one.
They will forever see losing at anytime to anyone as nothing other than a conspiracy against them. They will never admit that the vast majority of the Democratic Party rejects their their whole revolution bullshit.
yellowdogintexas
(22,231 posts)when we had ours, all candidates were on the ballot, contested or not.
honest.abe
(8,616 posts)Only the Dem primary is cancelled since its meaningless.
honest.abe
(8,616 posts)Bernie will have no more or no less influence regardless of how many delegates he accumulates. Sanders has already established he is a significant leader of the left wing of the party and Biden has already committed to working with Sanders on the platform.
Arguing over numbers of delegates is pointless and only leads to further division in the party and helps Trump.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Karma13612
(4,544 posts)We will have a Primary in June for down ballot elections. Just in case others are wondering about the logistics.
Cha
(296,868 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Mailing a separate presidential ballot would cost New York a ton of money https://www.politico.com/states/new-york/albany/story/2020/04/27/new-york-cancels-democratic-presidential-primary-1280260
We should minimize the number of people on the ballot, minimize the election for the protection of everybody and not have everyone on the ballot just for purposes of issues at a convention, Democratic Board of Elections Commissioner Andy Spano said during the board's meeting. .
But were dealing with a statute [that] specifically says that if a candidate has announced that theyre suspending their campaign, that they can be removed from the ballot, he said. What the Sanders supporters want is essentially a beauty contest that, given the situation with the public health emergency that seems to exist now, seems to be unnecessary and frivolous.
Kellner and other election officials had framed the decision as a logical one that will make it much easier to administer elections in a year with an unprecedented number of administrative challenges
For one, it will make it much easier to manage a newly expanded system of voting-by-mail. There will still be a number of primaries for congressional, state, and local elections on June 23. But presidential ballots need to be designed differently, because of the way people elect delegates. That would have meant the ballot would need to be printed on a separate piece of paper and would cause at least a doubling in the paperwork involved.
Mailing 6.5 million ballots for a presidential primary in addition to whatever number is required for a state and local election, is likely impossible, a board staff memo on the subject said. Mailing a lesser number for a state and local election may be impossible as well, but it would likely be more attainable.
And itll save some money at a time when the state's finances are in free-fall.