Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,508 posts)
Thu May 7, 2020, 10:19 AM May 2020

Supreme Court overturns 'Bridgegate' convictions

Source: Politico

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday tossed the federal government’s case in the infamous “Bridgegate” scandal, clearing the convictions of two allies of former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.

In the unanimous ruling, which further chips away at the nation’s public corruption case law, the justices concluded that the two defendants — Bridget Anne Kelly and Bill Baroni — did not defraud the government of its “property” by closing off two local access lanes to the George Washington Bridge over three days in September 2013.

Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/07/supreme-court-bridgegate-decision-242344

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court overturns 'Bridgegate' convictions (Original Post) brooklynite May 2020 OP
Needs to be lots of legislation when Biden wins the Senate (w help from Democrats nationwide). . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2020 #1
"Because the scheme here did not aim to obtain money or property, PoliticAverse May 2020 #2
As a former diabetic who also spent years on diuretics, CaptYossarian May 2020 #3
Unanimous decision denem May 2020 #4
Thanks elleng May 2020 #5
It is not the Supreme Courts fault... TomVilmer May 2020 #6
I wonder what the right law would have been, It sounds like... thesquanderer May 2020 #8
Courses on Lying and Legality sure to follow - Prevarication 211 bucolic_frolic May 2020 #7
"If you ain't cheating, you ain't trying"? czarjak May 2020 #9
Ugh.... sakabatou May 2020 #10
Always happy to see a unanimous ruling Steelrolled May 2020 #11

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
2. "Because the scheme here did not aim to obtain money or property,
Thu May 7, 2020, 10:24 AM
May 2020

Baroni and Kelly could not have violated the federal-program fraud or wire fraud laws."

From the (unanimous) decision: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-1059_e2p3.pdf

CaptYossarian

(6,448 posts)
3. As a former diabetic who also spent years on diuretics,
Thu May 7, 2020, 10:35 AM
May 2020

I wish I could have testified in support of those trapped taxpaying citizens.

thesquanderer

(11,986 posts)
8. I wonder what the right law would have been, It sounds like...
Thu May 7, 2020, 12:18 PM
May 2020

...the prosecutors used this property thing because it was the closest they could come to an actual illegal act. There may indeed be no law against a governmental office doing things to make life difficult for people as a means of political retribution. Which I could understand... when writing laws, who would ever envision that something like this would happen? I hope this is used as impetus for such laws to be created... but it can be hard to get people in government to enact laws that reduce their power.

bucolic_frolic

(43,141 posts)
7. Courses on Lying and Legality sure to follow - Prevarication 211
Thu May 7, 2020, 12:03 PM
May 2020

Science is dead. Truth is comatose. Money is free. Logic has been wobbly for awhile. These are the pillars of civilization, justice, and everyday discourse.

The Enlightenment is going down. Prepare for the Dark Ages in Plain Sight.

 

Steelrolled

(2,022 posts)
11. Always happy to see a unanimous ruling
Fri May 8, 2020, 08:56 AM
May 2020

Seems especially fitting that both sides of the court agreed on this case

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court overturns '...