Supreme Court overturns 'Bridgegate' convictions
Source: Politico
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday tossed the federal governments case in the infamous Bridgegate scandal, clearing the convictions of two allies of former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.
In the unanimous ruling, which further chips away at the nations public corruption case law, the justices concluded that the two defendants Bridget Anne Kelly and Bill Baroni did not defraud the government of its property by closing off two local access lanes to the George Washington Bridge over three days in September 2013.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/07/supreme-court-bridgegate-decision-242344
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,000 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Baroni and Kelly could not have violated the federal-program fraud or wire fraud laws."
From the (unanimous) decision: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-1059_e2p3.pdf
CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)I wish I could have testified in support of those trapped taxpaying citizens.
denem
(11,045 posts)TomVilmer
(1,832 posts)... if the wrong law was chosen for a rightful punishment.
thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)...the prosecutors used this property thing because it was the closest they could come to an actual illegal act. There may indeed be no law against a governmental office doing things to make life difficult for people as a means of political retribution. Which I could understand... when writing laws, who would ever envision that something like this would happen? I hope this is used as impetus for such laws to be created... but it can be hard to get people in government to enact laws that reduce their power.
bucolic_frolic
(43,141 posts)Science is dead. Truth is comatose. Money is free. Logic has been wobbly for awhile. These are the pillars of civilization, justice, and everyday discourse.
The Enlightenment is going down. Prepare for the Dark Ages in Plain Sight.
czarjak
(11,269 posts)sakabatou
(42,152 posts)Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)Seems especially fitting that both sides of the court agreed on this case