Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,006 posts)
Thu May 21, 2020, 05:08 PM May 2020

Senate confirms John Ratcliffe as next director of national intelligence in sharply divided vote

Source: Washington Post

The Senate confirmed Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Tex.) as the next director of national intelligence on Thursday, capping an unusually protracted process that saw the congressman withdraw his nomination last year in the face of bipartisan opposition, only to have President Trump challenge members of his own party and nominate Ratcliffe again seven months later.

The Senate voted 49-to-44 to confirm Ratcliffe along party lines. He received more votes against his confirmation than any DNI in the 15-year history of the office.

Ratcliffe will assume leadership of a sprawling federation of 17 intelligence agencies, with a collective budget of at least $60 billion, at an acutely vulnerable moment for U.S. national security. Still in the throes of a pandemic that has killed more than 90,000 people in the U.S. and wrought economic devastation, the U.S. is facing a dramatic escalation in tensions with China, the source of the viral outbreak; the prospect of repeated Russian interference in the 2020 election, which the intelligence community Ratcliffe will lead has said is all but certain; and painful decisions about how to support security and defense budgets when the government is spending trillions of dollars to keep the economy from collapsing.

... former colleagues and records showed that Ratcliffe didn’t play a significant role in any terrorism cases, contrary to his public claims. In a news release, Ratcliffe had touted his “special appointment as the prosecutor” in a high-profile terrorism financing case in 2008, U.S. v. Holy Land Foundation. But a spokesperson later acknowledged that Ratcliffe’s assignment wasn’t to prosecute the case but rather “to investigate issues related to” why an initial prosecution of Holy Land Foundation resulted in a mistrial.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/senate-confirms-john-ratcliffe-as-next-director-of-national-intelligence/2020/05/21/81a9f0be-9ada-11ea-ac72-3841fcc9b35f_story.html



Here is the official roll call vote. Unsurprisingly, every yea vote was a Republican (including "moderate" Susan Collins), and every nay vote was a Democrat. Seven senators did not vote - including Democrats Patty Murray (WA) and Ed Markey (MA), as well as independent who caucuses with Democrats Bernie Sanders (VT).
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate confirms John Ratcliffe as next director of national intelligence in sharply divided vote (Original Post) alp227 May 2020 OP
OK, Good to know who stands saidsimplesimon May 2020 #1
Patty Murray? SeattleVet May 2020 #2
Another unqualified cretin on the trump staff. iluvtennis May 2020 #3
NDNI, nominated by natl Director of National Stoopid.... lastlib May 2020 #4
So if I flip one Burger in life; djacq May 2020 #5
Dont understand the not voting group angrychair May 2020 #6
Corruption: That's it. Brainfodder May 2020 #7
Bernie again...how is he good for the party? Demonaut May 2020 #8

djacq

(1,633 posts)
5. So if I flip one Burger in life;
Thu May 21, 2020, 06:40 PM
May 2020

Does that make me an Executive Chef?

Anyone who has a TS/SCI Clearance to do just the minimum in a classified environment has more experience than Ratcliffe.

The Senate just gave away the keys to an inexperience political operative.

angrychair

(8,678 posts)
6. Dont understand the not voting group
Thu May 21, 2020, 09:19 PM
May 2020

The 7 that did not vote:

D
Markey (MA)
Murray (WA)
Sanders (VT)

R
Alexander (TN)
Burr (NC)
Murkowski (AK)
Rounds (SD)

My problem here is if the three Dems had voted than we were only 3 votes away from keeping an incompetent liar from holding one of the most serious and consequential positions in government.

We couldn't muster 3 Republicans to vote against this idiot? I don't understand.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate confirms John Ratc...