U.S. appeals court tells judge to respond to Flynn's bid to toss lying charge
Source: Reuters
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Thursday instructed the judge presiding over the criminal case against President Donald Trumps former national security adviser Michael Flynn to respond to a petition in which Flynn asked the appellate court to toss the charges.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit gave District Judge Emmet Sullivan 10 days to respond to an emergency petition filed by Flynns lawyers seeking to force Sullivan to grant a Justice Department request to dismiss the case.
The department, in a major reversal, on May 7 asked Sullivan to drop the charges, drawing accusations from Democrats and retired career prosecutors that Attorney General William Barr was politicizing the U.S. criminal justice system to go light on Trumps friends and associates.
A retired Army lieutenant general who also advised Trumps 2016 presidential campaign, Flynn pleaded guilty in 2017 to lying to the FBI about his conversations with Russias U.S. ambassador Sergey Kislyak in the weeks before Trump took office.
-snip-
POLITICS MAY 21, 2020 / 3:20 PM / UPDATED 3 HOURS AGO
Jan Wolfe
2 MIN READ
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-flynn/u-s-appeals-court-tells-judge-to-respond-to-flynns-bid-to-toss-lying-charge-idUSKBN22X2JW
Throck
(2,520 posts)Perjury sounds so much more sophisticated.
turbinetree
(24,695 posts)the judge is going to thrown the book at him and give him the maximum sentence.............because the judge doesn't have to follow the guidelines now..............Flynn opened a whole new can of worms, with this shit............Lock Him Up..........Fuck Him
Chainfire
(17,532 posts)After the election, win or lose, Trump will pardon half of the Federal Prison population.
SergeStorms
(19,199 posts)all of the "best people"? The best Trump could find to do his dirty deeds, that is.
bucolic_frolic
(43,141 posts)was supposed to go nowhere? Because I read a court would only grant such a writ if the judge were obligated by law to do something or rule on something and he wasn't doing it. i don't see where Judge Sullivan is obligated to rule on this within 10 days. He laid out a process, it's playing out.
We need respect for the rule of law and our courts. That's why I refer to him as Judge Sullivan, something we should do for all of them.
Marcuse
(7,479 posts)...whether Flynn was lying then or whether Flynn is lying now.