Kansas Supreme Court: Consent to search can be non-verbal
Source: Associated Press
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
NOVEMBER 14, 2020 12:36 PM
TOPEKA, KAN.
An individual's conduct can be relevant in determining whether a person has expressed valid consent to search, the Kansas Supreme Court said in a decision reversing a lower court ruling suppressing evidence.
The ruling Friday came in the case of Gianni Massimo Daino, who allowed police to enter his apartment when he opened the door and stood aside for them to come in.
The appeals court reversed a Johnson County District Court ruling suppressing evidence after the warrantless search led to the discovery of marijuana and other incriminating evidence.
The Supreme Court said valid consent requires a showing that an individual freely expressed consent and was not merely acquiescing to lawful authority. It ruled that an individual's nonverbal conduct can be relevant because a person may express valid consent through words, acts, or conduct.
Read more: https://www.fresnobee.com/article247191661.html
Sneederbunk
(14,289 posts)docgee
(870 posts)FarPoint
(12,335 posts)I love you!
The Mouth
(3,148 posts)If you don't explicitly and unambiguously deny consent, any murmur or mumble or nod can be construed as a 'yes'
Remember - ALWAYS -
The only things to say to a cop are "Am I free to leave" and if the answer isn't "yes" then ask for your lawyer. They are not your friend, and from the second contact happens anything you say can and will be used against you.
NEVER give consent to search, never tell them anything unless it's to help identify a person who committed a criminal act; if you aren't free to leave treat it as being under arrest and say nothing without checking with your lawyer first. In the words of one lawyer friend anyone who gives consent and/or tries to talk their way out of a possible infraction is a fucking idiot, full stop.
soryang
(3,299 posts)I won't open the door either. I don't care what their reason is for being on my front door step. They can tell me thru the door, if they have a warrant they can show it. if they have other process they can show it. otherwise the door stays shut. knock and talk is other police state bs for evading the requirement to get a warrant.
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)nycbos
(6,034 posts)My professor more or less used the exact same words.
She said you ask "am I free to leave" and if they say no you ask for a lawyer.
Jedi Guy
(3,185 posts)Some years ago, I was walking down the hallway in my apartment when, through the sliding glass door, I saw a random dude jump onto my patio. I didn't have long to ponder this before he was rugby tackled by a pursuing cop. Sure enough, the cops knocked on my door a minute later.
I opened the door, and as soon as the cop saw me, her hand immediately dropped to the butt of her gun. She asked me to step outside, so I did. Another cop who was there gestured at my apartment door and asked if I minded if they took a look around. I told them to go for it since I knew they wouldn't need a warrant or my consent to search, anyway. He asked if anyone else was in there, and I told him nope, just the cat. He went in, hallooing and saying, "Police" a few times, then came back out.
The first cop asked me if I had ID, and I told them it was in my office. We went to get it, with her right behind me. I handed over my ID, and they called it in to see if I had warrants. It came back clean, she handed me my ID back, and said they were all set and going to leave. Unable to suppress my curiosity, I asked what this was all about.
Turned out that a few streets over, a dude had flashed a gun and threatened to shoot someone, and then he and another guy who was with him (the gentleman who jumped onto my patio) took off running. He was described as a white male, about 6', shaved head, moustache and goatee, wearing a red t-shirt and jeans. I just so happened to be wearing a red t-shirt and jeans, which explains the reaction the cop had when she first saw me. I thanked them for their time and wished them a good day, and that was that.
I'm pretty sure that if I'd done anything right after opening the door, like moving suddenly or trying to close it, things would have gone sideways pretty fast. Keeping calm, staying polite, and complying when asked to do something by a cop is often a good way to avoid things going sideways, in my experience. Not always, as we've seen demonstrated before, but often.
oldsoftie
(12,530 posts)tirebiter
(2,535 posts)Who could imagine that they would freak out somewhere
in Kansas,
(Kansas, Kansas, Kansas, Kansas, )
(Kansas, Kansas, do-do-dun to-to
Kansas, Kansas, la la la)
(Kansas, Kansas, do-do-dun to-to
Kansas, Kansas)
qazplm135
(7,447 posts)even as a former Defense Attorney. If you nod and open the door and stand aside after a request to search that's pretty clearly consent.
Miguelito Loveless
(4,460 posts)If they have video of him opening the door, steeping aside and nodding them on, great. If not, the police are hardly credible witnesses, and this has been demonstrated more times than I can recall.
My default position is anything the police say is a lie.
demosincebirth
(12,536 posts)In court, under oath, cops and criminals.
docgee
(870 posts)He could have said no just as easily and it would still be the police's word against his.
Mr.Bill
(24,280 posts)will get you out of jury duty every time.
malthaussen
(17,186 posts)greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)oldsoftie
(12,530 posts)When i look at some of the juries around here, its scary.
Miguelito Loveless
(4,460 posts)for wrongful death.
qazplm135
(7,447 posts)wouldn't have made that argument if his client said that the cops were lying? He didn't. His client probably told him what he did and they tried to make the argument that a lack of verbal consent was a bar to search.
They didn't argue "the cops are lying" so I'm going to guess the cops weren't lying.
PatrickforO
(14,570 posts)The whole world is gonna fall apart now.
Clearly fogged in
(1,896 posts)Coyote45
(29 posts)As a retired prosecutor i agree to every thing above. it is a frustrating business.
safeinOhio
(32,670 posts)So, if you have reasonable cause to think I'm breaking the law, I'd be happy to wait for you to get a warrant signed by a judge to search my car or home for what you think I have in my possession and where exactly it is. Other wise, I do not consent. I am a law abiding citizen.
soryang
(3,299 posts)....your car can be searched without a warrant. there are technical limits on the scope of the search so I wouldn't consent to this search either, even though they will do it anyway without consent.
safeinOhio
(32,670 posts)Was told by a law prof that if stopped by a cop to hold your keys out toward him or her and say that you prefer to not be searched. Not sure if that is still a good idea. One of his reasons was to keep from getting your ass kicked and still have a reasonable case in court.
soryang
(3,299 posts)but I haven't practiced law in years. So I hesitate to give advice because I'm no longer a lawyer and I'm not qualified to do so. I personally am programmed not to offer any resistance to whatever an officer wants to do in a public setting, consent to nothing, offer nothing and say nothing. at home it's different, i won't open a door to an officer without legal process in hand.
safeinOhio
(32,670 posts)Lots of variables can come into play. Being older, I try to be at home when the street lights come on.
soryang
(3,299 posts)the point you just made, was the principal point and opening point of his CLE presentation.
They don't care about you, who you are, or what you think your rights are, they are obsessed with dominance and control. At the slightest sign of resistance, you will be the victim of violence, injured, arrested, jailed on trumped up charges of resistance, or worse.
His story told of one of his attorney colleagues who was mistakenly apprehended on suspicion of being a fugitive as he went to his car in the courthouse parking lot where he worked every day. Many if not all of the local police knew who he was. As they seized him, and the lecturer witnessed the whole incident, he resisted his briefcase being taken away, and the officers proceeded to beat the shit of out of him, cuff him, and stuff him, as they say. He sustained a broken bone in the process. The attorney lecture witness attempted to tell the police whom he knew personally that it was a case of mistaken identity, and they told him shut the fuck up, or you're going to jail with him. I don't remember how long he said it was that it took him to be released, not too long, because his friend was one of the mot prominent criminal defense lawyers in the state, but the harm was already done.
safeinOhio
(32,670 posts)file a complaint. For the most part, the brass do not like expensive law suits. If an individuals LEO has lots of complaints his or her life becomes more difficult in most departments.
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts)... I don't want any trouble, so, whatever you do, please remember that I did not consent.
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts).... suspicious behavior in a parking garage. The officers asked to search my car; I refused. They implied I might have to be taken in; I refused. While I was engaged in this exchange with the one, the other was "searching" the car by tossing everything in it out onto the road. They didn't find anything interesting so they left me there to clean up the mess.
soryang
(3,299 posts)i drove all over the lower 48. In the old southern states, I often saw police or highway patrol doing the same thing almost always to black or hispanic persons on the side of the highway. Ripping the inside of their car or van apart just throwing their property all over the side of the road.
Yes, i would make my refusal to consent explicit too.
marble falls
(57,075 posts)AllaN01Bear
(18,147 posts), if you are taken down town for questioning you have a right to an attorney , if you cant afford one , will be appointed for you . i also understand my right to 5th amendment rights against self incriminaton. do you understand these rights? . quit coddling the poilce .(rgb)
angrychair
(8,692 posts)Like early 90s, I had a friend staying at my apartment because of stuff at his home.
My then girlfriend and I had come back a little early from a trip and apparently my temporary roommate was planning on throwing a party i was not aware of.
Police knocked on my apartment door with 3 kids in tow, who had apparently purchased alcohol illegally.
They were asking for Jon so I said I would get him. I stood in front of the door and shut it, with them outside, as I went to talk to Jon.
He was in the process of trying to flush a half of weed down the toilet, which is not an easy task as weed floats. He was freaking out. FYI, I had no knowledge of this or anything else going on. I had literally only been home less than an hour and had been gone for days.
I took him to the door and told them they could speak to him outside. They agreed.
They had no reason to suspect me of anything and Jon got his parents called ( he was only 18) and got contributing to the delinquency of minors. He went back home that night.
I had the forethought, even in my 20s, to never give consent or allow them in.
spike jones
(1,678 posts)Wrap the weed buds in toilet paper then flush.
Mr.Bill
(24,280 posts)move out of Kansas.
that would certainly work for me.
malthaussen
(17,186 posts)IIRC, there was a relatively recent USSC decision that one can be determined to have waived one's right to silence (contra miranda) if one does not explicitly say "I am exercising my right to remain silent." This sounds like more of the same.
Those amendments in the Bill of Rights were put there to make policing harder, not easier. Because the Founders knew that if you gave the cops an inch, they'd take a friggin' mile.
-- Mal