Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

appalachiablue

(41,118 posts)
Wed Nov 18, 2020, 12:31 AM Nov 2020

FDA Allows 1st Rapid Virus Test That Gives Results At Home

Source: AP News

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. regulators on Tuesday allowed emergency use of the first rapid coronavirus test that can be performed and developed entirely at home. The announcement by the Food and Drug Administration represents an important step in U.S. efforts to expand testing options for COVID-19 beyond health care facilities and testing sites.

However, the test will require a prescription, likely limiting its initial use. The FDA granted emergency authorization to the 30-minute test kit from Lucira Health, a California manufacturer. The company’s test allows users to swab themselves to collect a nasal sample. The sample is then swirled in a vial that plugs into a portable device, that interprets the results and displays whether the person tested positive or negative for coronavirus.

To date, the agency has authorized nearly 300 tests for coronavirus. The vast majority require a nasal swab performed by a health professional and must be processed at laboratories using high-tech testing equipment. A handful allow people to collect their own sample at home — a nasal swab or saliva — that’s then shipped to a lab, which usually means waiting days for results.

Health experts have for months called for options to allow people to test themselves at home, reducing turnaround times and the potential spread of the virus to health care workers. Lucira did not immediately respond to request for additional details. ~

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-0430fe7460b4385bd952978f19b3d88d

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

mpcamb

(2,870 posts)
6. Right! Nothing definitive in the article about accuracy.
Wed Nov 18, 2020, 09:21 AM
Nov 2020

"FDA release did not disclose the test’s accuracy or the study results that regulators used to make the decision."

BadgerKid

(4,550 posts)
3. Is an office visit required first?
Wed Nov 18, 2020, 01:02 AM
Nov 2020

A friend of mine strongly suspected having a sinus infection but the doctor made him get a Covid test prior to granting an appointment. After a negative result three days later, he was given a prescription for the infection.

marble falls

(57,063 posts)
8. Happened Monday to my wife, but they did prescribe antibiotic (amoxycilin), too ...
Wed Nov 18, 2020, 10:58 AM
Nov 2020

... got her Covid-19 results yesterday. Negative.

IsItJustMe

(7,012 posts)
9. From the Lucira web site it claims 94% accuracy for positive and 98% accuracy for negative
Wed Nov 18, 2020, 11:43 AM
Nov 2020
https://www.lucirahealth.com/

In a Community Testing Study, where the Lucira test was compared to a FDA authorized known high sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 test, Lucira achieved a 94% positive percent agreement (PPA) and a 98% negative percent agreement (NPA). Excluding samples with very low levels of virus that possibly no longer reflected active infection1, Lucira achieved 100% positive percent agreement.

1. La Scola B., Clinical Infectious Diseases, September 2020
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I wonder how $$$ this test will cost?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FDA Allows 1st Rapid Viru...