Trump officials move to relax rules on killing birds
Source: Washington Post
Climate and Environment
Trump officials move to relax rules on killing birds
Overhaul of the 1918 Migratory Bird Treaty Act would not hold firms liable for incidentally causing scores of bird deaths
By Juliet Eilperin and Sarah Kaplan
November 27, 2020 at 10:33 a.m. EST
The Trump administration published an analysis Friday finding that its rule easing companies liability for killing birds would not cause significant environmental harm, clearing the way for it to finalize a major rollback before the presidents term ends on Jan. 20.
The administration, which is racing to lock in a series of regulatory changes before President-elect Joe Biden takes office, can now publish a final rule modifying the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services interpretation of the 1918 Migratory Bird Treaty Act as soon as Dec. 28. For three years, officials at the Interior Department have sought to shield energy companies, construction firms, and land developers from prosecution if their operations 'incidentally" kill birds, weakening protections under the law.
The new analysis suggests that all three alternatives including codifying the administrations narrower interpretation into law or returning to the historic definition that holds firms liable for accidental bird deaths will have incremental effects on current environmental conditions. It identifies scaling back the rule as its preferred alternative, and says including accidental deaths would be inconsistent with the Departments current view of the law.
The analysis suggests, however, that finalizing the rule would likely have negative effects on migratory birds because industry would have less of an incentive to adopt precautions to prevent birds from becoming ensnared in development projects.
{snip}
Juliet Eilperin
Juliet Eilperin is a Pulitzer Prize-winning senior national affairs correspondent for The Washington Post, covering environmental and energy policy. She has written two books, "Demon Fish: Travels Through the Hidden World of Sharks" and "Fight Club Politics: How Partisanship is Poisoning the House of Representatives." Follow https://twitter.com/eilperin
Sarah Kaplan
Sarah Kaplan is a climate reporter covering humanity's response to a warming world. She previously reported on Earth science and the universe. Follow https://twitter.com/sarahkaplan48
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2020/11/27/migratory-bird-treaty-act/
David Fahrenthold Retweeted
https://twitter.com/Fahrenthold
BREAKING: Three days after Trump pardoned a turkey, and a day after many Americans dined on one, the Trump administration took a key step to weaken a century-old law holding industry and individuals liable for killing birds. With
@sarahkaplan48
Link to tweet
jayfish
(10,039 posts)mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)but it does kill birds. Including migratory birds protected by the treaty.
Not as dramatically as Trump made it sound, but it does happen.
SpankMe
(2,957 posts)If you Google for bird death statistics you'll see that many orders of magnitude more birds are killed worldwide by domestic pet cats and by other birds of prey than by windmills. And technologies are emerging that are reducing the bird deaths via windmills.
It's probably a fair tradeoff in the final analysis.
sarge43
(28,941 posts)Cats: 2,400,000,000
Wind turbines: 234,012
https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-birds.php
truthisfreedom
(23,145 posts)Tall glass buildings are a huge bird hazard.
sarge43
(28,941 posts)Even in winter, we keep the outside screen doors on the patio doors so the birds won't crash into the glass. They bounce off the screens.
Response to mr_lebowski (Reply #2)
SpankMe This message was self-deleted by its author.
dalton99a
(81,450 posts)Bayard
(22,057 posts)Millions of birds affected. Laws should be strengthened, not relaxed!
?
Bigredhunk
(1,349 posts)jeffreyi
(1,939 posts)May they sue these bastards into oblivion. I know I am sending another donation.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,393 posts)BY CELINE CASTRONUOVO - 11/27/20 02:37 PM EST
The Trump administration on Friday advanced its plans to cut federal regulation protections for birds despite criticisms from scientists and former federal officials that the move will likely be severely detrimental to the U.S. bird population.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on Friday released its Final Environmental Impact Statement on the proposed change to the 1918 Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) that would greatly limit federal authority to prosecute industries for practices that kill migratory birds.
The act was first passed to stop the unregulated killing of migratory birds, according to Fridays report. Under the legislation, the Fish and Wildlife Service regulates the taking of migratory birds, which includes to pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, collect, or attempt to hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect.
The proposed change seeks to clarify the scope of the definition, although many have pointed out that the change will scale back federal prosecution authority for the threats birds face from industry, including electrocution on power lines, wind turbines that knock them from the air and oil field waste pits where landing birds can die in toxic water.
{snip}
Migratory Birds - Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
Documents and Resources
Federal Register documents
Regulations Governing Take of Migratory Birds, A Proposed Rule by the Fish and Wildlife Service on February 3, 2020 | PDF version
EIS Notice of Intent - Migratory Bird Permits; Regulations Governing Take of Migratory Birds; Environmental Impact Statement, February 3, 2020 | PDF version
Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Regulations Governing Take of Migratory Birds, published June 5, 2020 | PDF Version
Final Environmental Impact Statement for Regulations Governing Take of Migratory Birds, published November 27, 2020 | PDF Version
{snip}
dhill926
(16,337 posts)orange piece of shit...
DBoon
(22,354 posts)... executives of these energy companies, construction firms, and land developer companies?
Nitram
(22,791 posts)Roisin Ni Fiachra
(2,574 posts)He's already been driven completely insane by his election loss. He is a loser, and his future is a future of nothing but continuous losing.
"Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad."