Pfizer COVID vaccine significantly less effective against Delta variant
Source: The Jerusalem Post
The effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine against the Delta variant is weaker than health officials hoped, Prime Minister Naftali Bennett said Friday, as 855 people tested positive for coronavirus and more countries were listed as places of high infection.
We do not know exactly to what degree the vaccine helps, but it is significantly less, Bennett said.
The prime minister held a meeting of top health officials and ministers to discuss the next steps for managing the virus in light of the numbers in Israel and what Bennett described as the Delta mutation leaping forward around the world, including in vaccinated countries such as Britain, Israel and the US.
He said that Britain, in recent days, we have seen a jump in the number of children who are being hospitalized on a daily basis. This is a development that we are aware of; we are dealing with it rationally and responsibly.
Read more: https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/for-first-time-since-march-855-new-coronavirus-cases-in-israel-674084
hlthe2b
(102,137 posts)is not indicative of decreased vaccination efficacy despite the misleading way in which it is included in the article. It clearly is indicative of wide spread of Delta variant and likely underscores both its increased infectiousness and potential virulence--among the unvaccinated.
róisín_dubh
(11,791 posts)I swear to god, the media is not helping.
womanofthehills
(8,661 posts)It says kids who are vaxed and unvaxed in UK are coming down with the virus equally.
The likely explanation is that among current virus carriers, about 2,000 are schoolchildren, and half of them were fully vaccinated. Both groups are very unlikely to develop severe forms of the disease, even though it occasionally happens.
janterry
(4,429 posts)I mean. I appreciate the article. But there are SO many articles. I want a proper research study.
In fact, I want several proper research studies -- based all around the world.
Aussie105
(5,334 posts)That data is being gathered at the moment.
Too early for a valid statistical analysis, too early for research articles.
Meanwhile, the media will play this for all it's worth. That's their job.
Siwsan
(26,251 posts)Everyone else received Moderna.
I'm avoiding crowds (I'm skipping my 50th class reunion), still masking when I am out, and absolutely still hand sanitizing, so I'm relatively, sort of, nearly, almost not OVERLY concerned. But when I go in for my next medical appt., I'm asking my HCP about another jab. They gave Moderna and I will gladly take that as a 'booster', if it's compatible (and I understand it is). And, if not, I'll go where ever the Pfizer booster is available.
SWBTATTReg
(22,077 posts)sort of booster shot may or will be needed but I'm not a medical expert, so I am just shooting for the moon here/pure guessing here...
FarPoint
(12,293 posts)I don't think any one has a finger on how long the vaccine remains potent. I had the Moderna x 2 series...I plan on sticking with same manufacturer.
womanofthehills
(8,661 posts)They are now vaccinating the immune compromised with the Delta booster. Last Monday, Pfizer had an hour zoom call with our health officials supposedly to start using the booster here but supposedly our guys are not yet ready to go there.
SWBTATTReg
(22,077 posts)for Covid, one that could be just as important, or even more important, than the annual flu shot, being that Covid is so much deadlier.
With so many variants already detected in roughly 1 year+- or so w/ Covid, I hope that politics get put to the side, as politicians aren't doctors and thus, don't need to be interfering with efforts to fight this deadly disease (get into an annual routine like for the annual flu shots).
hlthe2b
(102,137 posts)mostly and a bit of Astra Zeneca-- so that is why Pfizer is specific to the findings REPORTED from Israel. It does NOT mean that Moderna is not equally if not slightly more vulnerable (given the early vaccination trials) to decreased efficacy against the Delta strain because the methodology is so similar and some small studies have shown that.
This is not a specific Pfizer issue.
LymphocyteLover
(5,638 posts)DVDGuy
(53 posts)From what I've read, Moderna and Pfizer are very similar vaccines with the only difference being the "packaging" around the vaccine as a way to get it into your body so it accepts it. They would have fairly similar efficacy. The Delta strain is a monster, both more infectious and more deadly, but luckily, any of the vaccines out now, even AZ, will greatly reduce the chance of hospitalisation and deaths (for Pfizer, around 1/10th of the chance compared to not being vaccinated, and that's assuming you catch the virus, the chance of that reduced to 1/5th - so roughly 50 times less likely to die from the Delta variant - this is basically getting into seasonal flu numbers).
Still got to wear a mask and get tested if you have symptoms though, mainly to protect the partially vaccinated, unvaccinated and those that are immune-compromised. Once 85%+ of the population are fully vaccinated, and herd immunity kicks in, we can start relaxing.
For those that are not vaccinating, take note. COVID-19 will be around for a long, long time, and it will eventually become as common as the flu. It's not a matter of "if" you'll get it, it's a matter of "when". So the real question is: do you prefer to get COVID as a vaccinated person or do you prefer to get COVID without any vaccination?
imavoter
(646 posts)is that a thing?
Siwsan
(26,251 posts)I remember hearing, much earlier in the year, that there might be one. Now with showing this easing of effectiveness I should HOPE something is offered.
LisaL
(44,972 posts)It's just a third dose.
It could also be modified to protect against a specific variant, but right now it would appear a third dose of exact same vaccine will work (increasing antibodies 5-10 fold per Pfizer).
womanofthehills
(8,661 posts)From WSJ -
Israel Begins Pfizer Booster Shots for At-Risk Adults as Delta Cases Rise
Move comes as Pfizer plans to seek clearance from U.S. regulators to distribute a booster shot
Response to LovingA2andMI (Original post)
Post removed
vanlassie
(5,663 posts)LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)Get It Right. There are lives on the line. The truth and nothing but must be told. Period. The efficacy is obviously not 95%. They can start there and keep on going with the rest of the truth - whatever it might be.
LymphocyteLover
(5,638 posts)and we have only limited data still
Sucha NastyWoman
(2,741 posts)Or at least not the Delta variant. So how can you get it right for something that doesnt yet exist?
C Moon
(12,209 posts)hlthe2b
(102,137 posts)I don't know where to begin, beyond asking you to PLEASE educate yourself. Your post is just the most ridiculous misunderstanding of the issue I've seen to date.
There is NOTHING in this finding to suggest we should throw out the most effective vaccines in the world against this or any other CORONAVIRUS to date and start over. Honestly, I'd like to help you with this, but I have to go back to work. Please. listen to some of the others on DU with expertise and do some reading.
vanlassie
(5,663 posts)help you with your extreme over generalizations. I cant even. Have a good day.
womanofthehills
(8,661 posts)When it comes to Delta. So - Israel which has lots of breakthrough cases has started vaccinating the immune compromised with Pfizers new vaccine - the Delta booster.
FarPoint
(12,293 posts)Effectiveness time frame requires the product to be in use for a predictable length of time....Vaccines for covid just started December 202...
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)This virus will keep mutating. I had the Moderna vaccine, and I feel confident that Im adequately protected. But if they recommend a third shot, Im good with that, too. Nothing is a panacea, and this is no exception. Nobody has said any differently.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)roamer65
(36,744 posts)855 breakthrough infections?
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)The article says cases are rising in UK and USA. This was also confirmed by the data of cases rising in all 50 states. LA County has returned back to masking. Sorry, but these cases are not all among individuals that are unvaxxed.
855 is what has been tested with PCR. How many people just stay home and deal with the effects and refuse to get tested?
The Delta is claimed to be "more transmissible". People for the large part have returned to work out of their homes. They are shopping and living life for a large part unmasked except indoors and that is a maybe.
Here is the thing. We need to get it right. PERIOD. And we need to be told the truth and nothing but. Too many lives are on the line and 855 is not a insufficient number at all, no matter how many millions have got the vaccine. We need to know ALL of the data and ALL of the facts.
roamer65
(36,744 posts)Id like to see more hard data, like you.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)It is 85 or they would not be reporting it and the PM Bennett would not be talking about it in this way. There is still too much not known.
Our political lens is OFF. It is what is the real data, real facts and what need to really be done. Lives are more important than a political lens IMHO.
LisaL
(44,972 posts)Israel had under 100 daily infections for a while (until delta hit).
wnylib
(21,346 posts)LisaL
(44,972 posts)Pfizer is clearly one of the best vaccines around (if not the best). If delta is breaking through Pfizer, it is also breaking through other vaccines.
wnylib
(21,346 posts)Israel's experience as an example of the need for continued precautions.
Since we don't have enough data, the reason for the dip in effectiveness is unknown, but I think it could involve time as well as the highly infectious nature of delta. It has been over 6 months since the first vaccinations rolled out. There was some intial thought that vaccines would be less effective aftet 6 months. I'd like to see some data on when delta breakthrough patients got their shots.
womanofthehills
(8,661 posts)Not good.
JohnSJ
(92,061 posts)Lovie777
(12,218 posts)per health officials - all hospitalization re: COVID (Delta) are unvaccinated people.
I personally know that some people will "claim" that they are fully vaccinated (not) - wear no masks.
At this point in time - everyone, including children should wear masks.
JohnSJ
(92,061 posts)up here have strongly recommended to wear masks inside public places whether vaccinated or not.
I hope this motivates people who haven't been vaccinated to get vaccinated.
Stay safe Lovie777
Sucha NastyWoman
(2,741 posts)JohnSJ
(92,061 posts)LisaL
(44,972 posts)NT
LymphocyteLover
(5,638 posts)infections to any degree.
womanofthehills
(8,661 posts)A rise in vaccine breakthrough infections
"About half of adults infected in an outbreak of the Delta variant of Covid-19 in Israel were fully inoculated with the Pfizer Inc. vaccine," reports Dov Lieber for The Wall Street Journal from Tel Aviv on June 25.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/vaccinated-people-account-for-half-of-new-covid-19-delta-cases-in-israeli-outbreak-11624624326We
Bayard
(22,011 posts)and hope, that scientists are still working on vaccines to combat the next variants coming down the road.
This is a way of life now.
JohnSJ
(92,061 posts)for those comments by the CDC and FDA, because they said it was premature to say they would be needed currently
joetheman
(1,450 posts)LisaL
(44,972 posts)NT
wnylib
(21,346 posts)for some months, since before delta.
relayerbob
(6,537 posts)Hence the need for flu shots each year. This is no different.
If everyone would cooperate, we could slow the rate of mutation by slowing the number of infections. Meanwhile, scare headlines are meaningless
Traildogbob
(8,683 posts)Obviously will keep An eye on the scientific Data coming. I would be more concerned with J and J and the one shot. They just had to recall tanning lotion, 5 varieties that have benzene in them, all from J and J. Recklessness with a carcinogen. My late wife died 20 years ago, and she used the baby powder all the time. She got cervical cancer. We did not know at the time, but they are facing 10s of thousands of lawsuits from cancer victims because of asbestos in the powder. And remember one of trumps first orders was to bring back asbestos use. Made in Russia! Within days shiploads of the shit came here from Pooty Poot. So, Biden, wassup? Waiting to hear more about Moderna and J and J effectiveness against Delta.
crimycarny
(1,351 posts)Antivirals aren't as sensitive to mutations. At least that's the case with flu. Tamiflu was introduced in 1999 and it's still been effective against flu strains 22 years later. Antivirals can also be used post-exposure to prevent ever developing the disease if you are exposed--assuming you take it soon enough that is. Finally, antivirals can work for those whose immune systems don't evoke a strong enough immune response to a vaccine.
Vaccines are crucial--I got my COVID vaccine as soon as I was eligible--but I hope we get some strong antivirals soon. Maybe the idiots who won't get vaccinated will be more willing to take a pill. Whatever is going to work, because obviously logic isn't.
BumRushDaShow
(128,511 posts)is that they need to be administered right way - basically at onset of symptoms or shortly after, in order to be most effective (where their job is to reduce the severity of the infection). And with the flu, you pretty much know when you got it when you suddenly get knocked on your ass pretty quickly by it.
But the problem with COVID-19 is that in a number cases, people can contract it and be "asymptomatic", not knowing they are infected, and spreading it in while in that asymptomatic state. And unless they are continually tested for it and/or someone close to them unknowingly contracts it from them and is symptomatic, prompting them to get tested, it would make anti-virals like those ineffective because the virus has already taken hold, and the longer you wait to finally take them, the less effective they can be. Of course actually contracting the disease prompts the body to eventually generate antibodies against it, but the level of antibodies apparently varies significantly from person to person and they are finding that they are not as persistent as vaccine-triggered antibodies.
And now with the Delta variant, some of the symptoms that are presenting in those who contract it, are "new" for COVID-19 - i.e., "cold-like" or "allergy-like" (sniffing/sneezing), which could then be interpreted by the infected as "just a cold", and they would wave away testing and/or treatment - until it's too late, especially if/when the other "classic" symptoms start up.
crimycarny
(1,351 posts)Antivirals aren't perfect but they can fill gaps that, along with vaccines, will help to get this under control.
The gaps they can fill are for immunocompromised whose bodies don't respond strongly enough to vaccination to evoke a strong enough response. Same for the elderly who don't always have a strong enough immune response to vaccinations.
Antivirals can be taken post-exposure. So if there is an outbreak and you think you might have been exposed you can take an antiviral and never develop the disease (or have a milder case).
Once you develop symptoms of COVID you can take an antiviral and reduce your risk of getting sick. Can't take a vaccine at the point, too late.
Vaccines are great, I'm not suggesting they aren't and I wish more people would get vaccinateded, but we need more than one weapon. Vaccination AND antivirals will give us even more ammunition.
BumRushDaShow
(128,511 posts)Except that with the two mentioned for flu, they are only most effective at or shortly after onset of symptoms and with the flu, you DO get some very obvious tell-tale symptoms. If you have been sick with the flu for over a week or more and then try taking one of those antivirals, it will pretty much not make much difference, and given their cost, they become a waste of money.
The problem with a COVID-19 infection is that unlike the flu, if someone is infected AND untested to confirm, AND ends up "asymptomatic" for some extended time before symptoms actually begin, then the antiviral is not going to have much impact once any symptoms do appear.
The only way to mitigate that is to have testing early enough to determine if someone is infected but asymptomatic, and THEN administer the antiviral to help reduce the course of the virus any further (in combination with the vaccine), before the onset of symptoms.
crimycarny
(1,351 posts)This antiviral looks promising and I'm keeping my eye on it. Reducing viral load by 70% vs placebo in hospitalized patients, means they were pretty darn sick when they were given the antiviral versus "administered right away". Their viral load had to be pretty high to be hospitalized.
The interim analysis of the Phase 2 study included data from 70 hospitalized, high-risk patients with COVID-19 of which data from 62 patients were evaluable for virology analysis. Interim virology results indicated that AT-527 rapidly reduced viral load levels. At Day 2, patients receiving AT-527 experienced a 0.7 log10 (80%) greater mean reduction from baseline viral load as compared to placebo. A sustained difference in viral load reduction was maintained through Day 8.
https://ir.ateapharma.com/news-releases/news-release-details/ateas-527-oral-antiviral-drug-candidate-reduces-viral
BumRushDaShow
(128,511 posts)at present, Remdesivir is the current anti-viral approved for this use, although over time after evaluating longer-term study data, it was found that Remdesivir was not improving outcomes as much as hoped and is no longer being recommended - https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20210716/large-remdesivir-study-finds-no-covid-19-survival-benefit
I agree that having some anti-viral will be advantageous. The hope will be that they will be effective for some of these variants.
crimycarny
(1,351 posts)Remdesivir had to be administered via IV, so was never optimal though it would have been great if it worked in the severely ill.
Just because Remdesivir didn't work doesn't future antivirals won't. Look at AZT for HIV, it was a disappointment but now we've got antivirals that keep the HIV virus undetectable.
Progress, not perfection. I'm going to remain optimistic.
BumRushDaShow
(128,511 posts)My whole point was that for COVID-19, because of the way it manifests with some percentage of people who can be "asymptomatic" and have no idea that they are even infected, the hope is to find one that can be an effective prophylactic in advanced infection cases vs the comparison with something like Tamiflu or Relenza, that were designed to be used right at onset.
crimycarny
(1,351 posts)Totally agree that finding an antiviral that can be used post-exposure is crucial in the fight against a virus like COVID where people are often asymptomatic or it takes a while for symptoms to show. I believe AT-527 is showing promise for prophylactic use so my fingers and toes are crossed.
Sgent
(5,857 posts)for anything. Tamiflu is better than nothing, but its a lot closer to nothing than antibiotics for community acquired pneumonia.
IMHO we have a better chance of getting a mRNA booster out than an antiviral that works.
crimycarny
(1,351 posts)Have you taken Tamiflu before? I know of two years in the last 5-6 where the flu shot missed the mark and people who were vaccinated got the flu anyway. Tamiflu was a life safer those two years. CDC actually sent out an advisory to doctors to prescribe Tamiflu for their elderly patients because they weren't responding to the vaccine.
My daughter got the flu in 2019 from her roommate who had had the flu shot. Her roommate's mom is a doctor, got her Tamiflu right away. Both had their fevers go away after about 24 hours, 48 hours later almost all symptoms were completely gone, 72 hours later it was as if they had never had the flu at all. My husband had the same result with Tamiflu the year he got the flu. I know of many many MANY people who have had similar experiences with Tamiflu.
Tamiflu has been far far better than "nothing" in my personal experience.
It's not an "either/or". I'm simply stating we need both. Those mRNA boosters aren't going to help those whose immune responses aren't strong enough.
bucolic_frolic
(43,062 posts)months ago, early this year, and today I got a text from CDC - a followup to their surveys on health in the 2 weeks after the vaccine. So I'm thinking they are seeing how many are sick now that Delta is loose. The survey surprised me because I thought they surveying was all done long ago.
NH Ethylene
(30,803 posts)So this may be part of the PR campaign to support that decision.
LisaL
(44,972 posts)NT
NH Ethylene
(30,803 posts)LisaL
(44,972 posts)A lot of fully vaccinated people are getting infected with delta covid in Israel.
Evolve Dammit
(16,697 posts)boosters with an objective eye, and not what was suppressed under Orange Julius.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)not accurate and peddles teh Right wing tlking points on how dangerous vax are...
elias7
(3,991 posts)elias7
(3,991 posts)Aussie105
(5,334 posts)I've had the first AstraZ shot and I have no illusions that I'm safe.
Still won't be after the second shot has been had and has had 2 weeks to give maximum effect.
I can still catch it, get sick from it, and spread it.
But the chances of being hospitalized and dying from it are greatly reduced.
Same for other vaccinations.
Boosters are a given. Same as the flu vaccination.
Karma13612
(4,544 posts)I wonder if Moderna stats are available for here in the states.
Moderna vs Pfizer. Hubby and I got Moderna and I was wicked sick with dose#2. I recall people seemed to get sicker responses to Moderna than to Pfizer. As a result, maybe there IS a difference between the 2 vaccines.