Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(128,895 posts)
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 01:06 PM Aug 2021

Biden Administration Approves Largest Permanent Increase in Food Stamps

Last edited Sun Aug 15, 2021, 04:28 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: New York Times

WASHINGTON — The Biden administration has revised the nutrition standards of the food stamp program and prompted the largest permanent increase to benefits in the program’s history, a move that will give poor people more power to fill their grocery carts but add billions of dollars to the cost of a program that feeds one in eight Americans.Under rules to be announced on Monday and put in place in October, average benefits will rise more than 25 percent from prepandemic levels. All 42 million people in the program will receive additional aid.

The move does not require congressional approval, and unlike the large pandemic-era expansions, which are starting to expire, the changes are intended to last. For at least a decade, critics of the benefits have said they were too low to provide an adequate diet. More than three-quarters of households exhaust their benefits in the first half of the monthly cycle, and researchers have linked subsequent food shortages to problems as diverse as increased hospital admissions, more school suspensions and lower SAT scores. Under the new rules, average monthly benefits, $121 per person before the pandemic, will rise by $36.

Although the increase may seem modest to middle-class families, proponents say it will reduce hunger, improve nutrition and lead to better health. In an interview last week, the agriculture secretary, Tom Vilsack, simultaneously described the work as a technical exercise in nutrition science and a reflection of the forces reshaping the politics of the safety net. In the middle of disease, hardship and racial disparities, he said, the $79 billion annual cost of the program helps “stabilize our democracy.” “We may have a Constitution and a Declaration of Independence, but if we had 42 million Americans who were going hungry, really hungry, they wouldn’t be happy and there would be political instability,” Mr. Vilsack said.

Coinciding with a large new child tax credit — which temporarily offers families with children an income guarantee — the growth food aid comes as part of an enormous pandemic-era expansion of government assistance. Critics say that the costs are unsustainable and that the aid erodes Americans’ willingness to work. The new plan will raise the program’s costs by about $20 billion a year from prepandemic levels. In technical terms, the Agriculture Department has revised the Thrifty Food Plan, a list of two dozen food groups the government uses to estimate the cost of an economical, nutritious diet. Its value was first set in 1962 and, other than being adjusted for inflation, had not grown since then, despite a revolution in what Americans eat.

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/15/us/politics/biden-food-stamps.html





WaPo finally did their article -

Biden administration approves largest increase to food assistance benefits in SNAP program history

By Laura Reiley
Today at 3:23 p.m. EDT

The Biden administration has approved the largest increase to food assistance benefits in the history of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), in a move that will substantially retool the program to provide the targeted assistance advocates have long said is desperately needed by poor families. U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack will announce Monday morning that benefit amounts for the program, formerly known as food stamps, will rise an average of 25 percent above pre-pandemic levels.

The increases are based on an update to the Thrifty Food Plan, the formula used to calculate benefits, which surveys the changing costs of various categories of food.First reported by the New York Times and confirmed by a spokeswoman at the USDA, average monthly benefits, which were $121 per person before the pandemic, will rise by $36 under the new rules. Many anti-hunger advocates have long believed the Thrifty Food Plan’s metrics are out of date with the economic realities most struggling households face.

They say the plan, formulated in the 1960s, was designed when many American families still had only one working parent, giving the other parent more time for labor-intensive, but cheaper, cooking from scratch. In the past two decades, more working families are made up of two wage earners or a single-parent, leaving less time for soaking beans and simmering stews. The Biden administration has asked the USDA to revise the Thrifty Food Plan to better reflect the modern cost of a healthy basic diet.

(snip)

The changes to SNAP are permanent, aimed at addressing pandemic-related surge in hunger in America, when projections predicted 50 million people, including 17 million children, would be considered food insecure by the end of 2020. But, advocates say, the infusion of funding corrects benefits that fall far short of demonstrated need, a problem they say has existed for at least a decade.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2021/08/15/snap-food-assistance-benefit-boost/
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Biden Administration Approves Largest Permanent Increase in Food Stamps (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Aug 2021 OP
K&R bluewater Aug 2021 #1
Does the extra monthly income from the child tax credit change the eligibility standards? MichMan Aug 2021 #2
Apparently not BumRushDaShow Aug 2021 #4
I was wondering if it counted as monthly income and put people over the income limits to be eligible MichMan Aug 2021 #6
This is what the program is BumRushDaShow Aug 2021 #9
Very often programs are based on earned income, or adjusted gross income. Igel Aug 2021 #32
Good news for a family member Ramsey Barner Aug 2021 #3
Oh shit Traildogbob Aug 2021 #5
Good Deminpenn Aug 2021 #7
"average monthly benefits, $121 per person ..." left-of-center2012 Aug 2021 #8
Here are the current requirements BumRushDaShow Aug 2021 #10
My numbers identical to yours. My $16/mo. will go up to $20. Nourished by food banks. WheelWalker Aug 2021 #14
I get $110 monthly from SNAP. Elessar Zappa Aug 2021 #29
President Biden will go down as the greatest present in history. Autumn Aug 2021 #11
The middle class and poor are reaping serious benefits now! Ligyron Aug 2021 #13
the old an disable are still,,, Cryptoad Aug 2021 #27
Why old, poor, disabled people vote repub in these States, I will never understand Willis88 Aug 2021 #28
I dont think you can blame the Old Disable Folk,,, Cryptoad Aug 2021 #31
Agreed! Willis88 Aug 2021 #21
Critics of the child tax credit are right about one thing... Trueblue Texan Aug 2021 #12
"Critics say the costs..." Grins Aug 2021 #15
Where we are evacuating from right now BumRushDaShow Aug 2021 #16
The conservatives and Republicans who want this reduced only need to allow a substantial increase ShazamIam Aug 2021 #17
Good news. Magoo48 Aug 2021 #18
Excellent news! Food! TY, BRDS & Cha Aug 2021 #19
YW Cha BumRushDaShow Aug 2021 #22
Oh TY for the Background on that! Cha Aug 2021 #23
I added WaPo's article on it that just came out as breaking BumRushDaShow Aug 2021 #26
TY! Cha Aug 2021 #30
Bravo! Willis88 Aug 2021 #20
One of the things pointed out BumRushDaShow Aug 2021 #24
The slow cooker doesn't care if you're home Deminpenn Aug 2021 #33
I have 2 of them BumRushDaShow Aug 2021 #34
All boils down to where u live since,,,, Cryptoad Aug 2021 #25

BumRushDaShow

(128,895 posts)
4. Apparently not
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 01:19 PM
Aug 2021

because what they did was to revise and update the calculation for the cost of that program to determine the new benefits based on a 2018 GOP-passed law (am assuming they are talking about the renewed FARM Bill - https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/2)

The changes are the result of a law passed in 2018 by a Republican Congress, which ordered a review of the program’s assumptions and gave the Agriculture Department four years to do it. In January, President Biden urged the department to speed up the process so that benefits “reflect the true cost of a basic healthy diet.”

In allowing the plan’s value to rise, officials argued they were following the 2018 law, which required new standards but did not specify whether costs should stay the same. “A majority of Republicans in the Senate and House voted for this,” Mr. Vilsack said. “They deserve credit.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/15/us/politics/biden-food-stamps.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytimes


I.e., an apparent "loophole" because the directive in there apparently did not require the updates to be "revenue neutral". Of course now they are whining.

MichMan

(11,912 posts)
6. I was wondering if it counted as monthly income and put people over the income limits to be eligible
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 01:33 PM
Aug 2021

Sounds like that isn't the case

BumRushDaShow

(128,895 posts)
9. This is what the program is
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 01:46 PM
Aug 2021
The Thrifty Food Plan: What It Is and Why It Matters


Posted by Food and Nutrition Service Public Affairs in Food and Nutrition
Aug 12, 2021


At the direction of Congress and with the support of President Biden as part of the administration’s Build Back Better initiative, USDA is re-evaluating the Thrifty Food Plan (TFP) to ensure that it reflects the cost of a practical, nutritious, budget-conscious diet. The re-evaluation is based on four factors: the cost of food, nutrients in food, nutrition guidance, and what Americans eat. USDA plans to publish its re-evaluation soon.

What is the Thrifty Food Plan?

USDA develops four food plans that estimate the cost of a nutritious diet across various price points—the Thrifty, Low-Cost, Moderate-Cost and Liberal Food Plans. The Thrifty Food Plan is the lowest cost of the four.

The TFP represents the cost to purchase groceries for a family of four – an adult male and female, ages 20-50, and two children, ages 6-8 and 9-11. The plan is designed to meet the nutritional needs of an average person consuming a healthy, cost-conscious diet at home.

Why is the Thrifty Food Plan important?

The Thrifty Food Plan plays a critical role in calculating Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefit amounts. By law, the cost of the TFP in June each year is equal to the maximum SNAP benefit for a household of four people for the following October through September. That amount is then adjusted to determine the maximum benefit for households of other sizes.

Why is USDA re-evaluating the Thrifty Food Plan?

The 2018 Farm Bill directed USDA to re-evaluate the TFP no later than 2022 and then every five years thereafter. Since the TFP was last updated in 2006, there have been notable changes to dietary guidance, food prices, and what Americans purchase and eat. The current re-evaluation uses the most up-to-date data available to reflect those changes.

For more information on the TFP, check out: www.fns.usda.gov/snap/thriftyfoodplan

For more on recent TFP listening sessions, read: www.usda.gov/media/blog/2021/08/09/you-spoke-we-listened-challenges-purchasing-healthy-food-snap-benefits


https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2021/08/12/thrifty-food-plan-what-it-and-why-it-matters


And there is still an eligibility requirement to receive the benefits in any case and the law had been put in place before any of the tax credits legislation came about. In fact, based on the way it is written, the re-evaluation will need to happen every 5 years after this. Of course I expect that the GOP is going to target this when the Farm Bill comes up for renewal.

Igel

(35,300 posts)
32. Very often programs are based on earned income, or adjusted gross income.
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 09:39 PM
Aug 2021

Tax credits, refundable or otherwise, apply after that's calculated.

Ramsey Barner

(349 posts)
3. Good news for a family member
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 01:16 PM
Aug 2021

who recently has been quite reliant on SNAP. Decreasing food insecurity and hunger in this country gives a huge boost to freedom.

Traildogbob

(8,724 posts)
5. Oh shit
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 01:21 PM
Aug 2021

THIS will drive Fox Christians insane. “who’s gonna pay”, while they are screaming about sending troops BACK to Afghanistan for humanitarian purposes. We can NOT feed our poor, we need to feed the military industrial complex. Damn you Joe Biden with your socialism. Tucker, Hannity and the Bimbo with ever present teeth on Monday will be epic. What about the pulling up from the boots over there and spend the trillions here. Oh shit, there I go with the “What about ism”.

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
8. "average monthly benefits, $121 per person ..."
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 01:45 PM
Aug 2021

I get $25 a month food stamps. It went up two years ago from $17 a month.
Where does this "$121 per person" come from?

I'm 75, disabled, single, on $1,200 a month Social Security.
My doctor visits and some prescriptions require copays.

And EBT (SNAP, food stamps) gives me $25 a month to buy food.

Who is this person getting $121 a month?

BumRushDaShow

(128,895 posts)
10. Here are the current requirements
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 02:05 PM
Aug 2021
https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/recipient/eligibility# (scroll down to the entry "What are the SNAP income limits?" and click to open the table)

It looks like if your SS is not SSI or other disability pension/annuity, then you might not be counting as "disabled" - https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/eligibility/elderly-disabled-special-rules

WheelWalker

(8,955 posts)
14. My numbers identical to yours. My $16/mo. will go up to $20. Nourished by food banks.
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 02:55 PM
Aug 2021

On edit: Identical except I'm 72

Autumn

(45,060 posts)
11. President Biden will go down as the greatest present in history.
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 02:09 PM
Aug 2021
So wonderful to finally have a president looking out for those in need.

Ligyron

(7,629 posts)
13. The middle class and poor are reaping serious benefits now!
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 02:51 PM
Aug 2021

Government providing for its citizens as opposed to corporations for a change. People see this too, almost all Joe’s programs and proposals like Infrastructure reflects this. The RW smear machine is going to have a very difficult time persuading a large proportion of even its target audience otherwise.

Hard to see the vast majority of Americans voting against this style of governing.

Unless the GOP is hugely successful in voter suppression Democrats should be a shoe in. Eliminate the filibuster and get the voting rights bills passed and the days of rule by the minority could be ended.

Willis88

(109 posts)
28. Why old, poor, disabled people vote repub in these States, I will never understand
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 04:55 PM
Aug 2021

I feel for the people who cannot relocate. Hope more help can be done at the Federal level when the state betrays their citizens for corporate interests.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
31. I dont think you can blame the Old Disable Folk,,,
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 07:11 PM
Aug 2021

for voting Red. None that I know do........where did u get ur data....?

Trueblue Texan

(2,429 posts)
12. Critics of the child tax credit are right about one thing...
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 02:11 PM
Aug 2021

...it certainly does erode Americans' willingness to work...for slave wages.

Grins

(7,217 posts)
15. "Critics say the costs..."
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 02:58 PM
Aug 2021
“Critics say that the costs are unsustainable and that the aid erodes Americans’ willingness to work.”

What they NEVER said when Trump dumped $28 BILLION of farmers to cover his ass after his disaster of a trade “policy” with China, all on top of the $52 BILLION he gave to farmers in just his last nightmare of a year in office.

“Soshilist!” welfare payments to farmers now make up more than 1/3rd of total farm income! Any sign that is making them “unwilling to work”?

BumRushDaShow

(128,895 posts)
16. Where we are evacuating from right now
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 03:14 PM
Aug 2021

at over $1 trillion spent over the past 20 years, had a cost that unsustainable! And most critically, Iraq, since they had nothing to do with 9/11.

Here is a good article on the farm grift - https://www.npr.org/2020/12/30/949329557/farmers-got-a-government-bailout-in-2020-even-those-who-didnt-need-it

ShazamIam

(2,570 posts)
17. The conservatives and Republicans who want this reduced only need to allow a substantial increase
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 03:16 PM
Aug 2021

in the minimum wage to decrease the number of people who need food support.

But they won't because corporate ag benefits, the food processors benefit and the retailers benefit from the tax supported food support.

BumRushDaShow

(128,895 posts)
22. YW Cha
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 04:16 PM
Aug 2021

and the irony is that this was done to comply with a directive in the GOP-sponsored/passed FARM Bill done in 2018, telling USDA to update that program's cost based on current nutritional recommendations, and do it by 2022, with the expectation to keep it updated every 5 years afterwards, to correspond to the 5-year FARM Bill renewals. Previously it was only being adjusted for inflation, but the core eligible foods and their cost, was never updated.

Little did they know what that meant and how it would be implemented! Now they are whining about it.

BumRushDaShow

(128,895 posts)
26. I added WaPo's article on it that just came out as breaking
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 04:40 PM
Aug 2021

and they mentioned that USDA is finally changing from the standard that was based on how people cooked in the 1960s.

Willis88

(109 posts)
20. Bravo!
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 04:05 PM
Aug 2021

I’m probably more centrist than a lot of folks here, but I find the republican position on this one disgusting. In one of the wealthiest country’s in the world, no one should go to bed hungry.

Let’s help those most in need, and this increase does exactly that! Way to go President Biden!

BumRushDaShow

(128,895 posts)
24. One of the things pointed out
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 04:38 PM
Aug 2021

(and I just added it to the OP from WaPo's article) is that the current "standards" before the changes announced, were based on what the situation was in the '60s, before the major shift to having 2-parent households with BOTH parents (and/or other family members) having to work or where today you have a much larger percentage of single-parent households.

So the "cooking" strategies of today are no longer allowing for the drawn out "soaking of beans" or "simmering stews" (often done during the day when one parent might have been "stay-at-home" while the other worked at a lower wage job). I expect you see more "skillet meals" or "casseroles" or other meal ideas that can be prepped in an hour or less because there just isn't that kind of time when you get home exhausted and obviously can't do take-out every day, which is costly.

BumRushDaShow

(128,895 posts)
34. I have 2 of them
Mon Aug 16, 2021, 06:50 PM
Aug 2021

and many do use those, although others would prefer not to have some heating appliance "on" when they are not home and would rather run them overnight during work days vs during the day.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
25. All boils down to where u live since,,,,
Sun Aug 15, 2021, 04:40 PM
Aug 2021

food stamps programs are run by the states...... in teh Red states of the South, if u disable,,,, just pray that somebody will knock u in the head and put u out of ur misery

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Biden Administration Appr...