Gov. Whitmer will veto Michigan GOP's school voucher proposal
Source: Detroit Free Press
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer will veto the latest effort by legislative Republicans to create a school voucher system in Michigan, a new proposal that may skirt a constitutional ban on using public money to fund private education.
Bills fast-tracked in the House and Senate on Tuesday create a system where private donors would give money to specially created organizations, which in turn would divvy up the funds for qualified students to use for educational purposes. However, all of those contributions would be entirely tax deductible, resulting in hundreds of millions less in tax revenue, according to legislative projections.
"The bill would reduce state revenue by as much as $500 million in the first year it was effective, with the potential for the revenue loss to increase 20% per year in later years," states an analysis conducted by the nonpartisan Senate Fiscal Agency.
In a statement, Whitmer spokesman Bobby Leddy did not directly say the legislation violated the state Constitution. But he suggested the potential tax deductions from the bills violate the spirit of the constitutional provision.
Read more: https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2021/10/20/school-voucher-michigan-gop-whitmer/8535487002/
Diamond_Dog
(31,922 posts)Schools that are not always held accountable for what they teach or for diversity
Sickening.
IbogaProject
(2,789 posts)Those private schools are never unionized.
JustAnotherGen
(31,781 posts)The Michigan Legislature is going in the wrong direction.
I think every state should raise property taxes and implement/raise state income taxes to a minimum of 10K per tax filer unless one is NOT a home owner. This will even things up and a lot of people will be much happier about the SALT Cap.
Bonus - we will fully fund education.
DownriverDem
(6,226 posts)Gov Whitmer, AG Nessel and SOS Benson the repub run MI House and Senate would push restrictive views.
ExTex
(2,138 posts)State tax funding at the time was limited to the public schools. The Catholic-sponsored ballot language was weasely and densely written so the only way to vote AGAINST dedicating public funds to parochial schools (Parochaid) was to vote "Yes". A "No" vote was to adopt parochaid. It was easy to imagine the sermons in Catholic churches the Sunday morning before election day. Parochaid failed; but by the time I returned from the Army in 1974 it had been fully implemented. Score one for the Church.
My antipathy towards the Church was rekindled during the last election when the language on the marquee on the lawn of Catholic church at the end of our street was a thinly veiled Trump endorsement.
My family has an ugly relationship with the Catholic church which need not be rehashed here. My wife is a dedicated Catholic so it's not as if my irritation runs unchecked-- although she and her daughter were badly treated also. I don't even like Quakers; but that's a different subject.
JI7
(89,241 posts)and that's the least of their offenses.
paleotn
(17,884 posts)taxpayers to foot the bill for their religo-nut "schools."
bucolic_frolic
(43,062 posts)Yeah, that's privilege for ya
kimbutgar
(21,056 posts)LogicFirst
(571 posts)Two of the Cstholic grade schools in my are each receive about $1 million a year in donations. This is money that could have gone to the public schools.
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)Republicans in the state have been after public education for years. Good teachers are retiring and/or finding new careers. They are sick of dealing with their students fascist scum parents.
The state has had to make emergency changes in teacher qualifications. My kid's biology class is taught by a young guy who majored in golf course management.