Bank of England warns of 'apocalyptic' global food shortage
Source: The Telegraph
By Tim Wallace
16 May 2022 11:15pm
The Governor of the Bank of England has warned of apocalyptic global food price rises and said he is "helpless" in the face of surging inflation as the economy is battered by the war in Ukraine.
Andrew Bailey said he has run out of horsemen when counting the shocks facing Britain, with runaway energy and food costs driven by global market forces beyond his control.
Prices are rising at the fastest rate in 30 years, creating a "very big income shock" that is expected to intensify in coming months with a risk of double-digit inflation before the end of the year.
Mr Bailey told MPs on the Treasury Select Committee that he is increasingly concerned about a further surge in food costs if Ukraine, a major crop grower, is unable to ship wheat and cooking oils from its warehouses because of a Russian blockade.
Read more: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2022/05/16/bank-england-warns-apocalyptic-global-food-shortage/
peppertree
(21,596 posts)They are every bit as guilty in this as Vlad the Invader (who no doubt has been cashing in himself).
roamer65
(36,744 posts)Fuel and food rationing are coming soon, just like 1942-1945.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)roamer65
(36,744 posts)Drought.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)speak easy
(9,176 posts)India banned COVID vaccine exports as soon as they had a significant outbreak.
Hekate
(90,550 posts)
when the potato crop failed? Instead of their absentee landlords shipping it out the way theyd always done?
So I get it. India is going to try to feed their own people first, and I cant blame them.
Hekate
(90,550 posts)Los Angeles Times, May 11, 2022 page A1 continuing on page A4
Apologies for whatever reason, my copy function refuses to work today.
Ukraine feeds the world, just about, and right now their farmers are trying to sow wheat and dodge incoming missiles. In addition to the Russians blocking the port of Odessa, the Ukrainians are mining the harbor to keep the Russians out. Putin really, really wants that port.
Bottom line, the shortage is about to get exquisitely real.
https://enewspaper.latimes.com/infinity/latimes/default.aspx?pubid=50435180-e58e-48b5-8e0c-236bf740270e&edid=b769f8c6-a143-4fc8-ab54-2287ab94f2c3&pnum=1
https://enewspaper.latimes.com/infinity/latimes/default.aspx?pubid=50435180-e58e-48b5-8e0c-236bf740270e&edid=b769f8c6-a143-4fc8-ab54-2287ab94f2c3&pnum=4
roamer65
(36,744 posts)The Middle East and Africa are going to feel the effects first.
Lebanon especially.
Vogon_Glory
(9,109 posts)The Russian grain harvests vastly improved after Soviet-style agricultural policies were discarded, and not only were the Ukrainians exporting large grain surpluses, but so were the Russians.
I fear were in for hungry times for the next couple of years, no thanks to Vladimir Putin.
Warpy
(111,135 posts)Meat heavy diets are killing people. We'd be a lot better off if we cut down the meat intake for a few years until Putin's war is over, the pandemic is something we can live with, and India has a decent harvest, which they're unlikely to this year.
The result if we don't is unthinkable.
cstanleytech
(26,224 posts)nature will bring our population into check if we refuse to do so ourselves.
rubbersole
(6,660 posts)We can't/won't/haven't addressed this in any meaningful way. Our grandchildren will suffer the consequences. Hope they don't hate us too much for destroying the planet.
Auggie
(31,133 posts)CrispyQ
(36,420 posts)I bought that bumper sticker back around the turn of the century.
Warpy
(111,135 posts)China, South Korea and Japan are finding themselves with bumper crops of frail elderly and too few people to look after them.
Europe and North America would be facing the same problem, but we've allowed immigration from parts of the world with overabundant populations. This drives right wing bigots around the bend because they only see skin color, nothing else. They are incapable of realizing just how essential these people are to keeping this country running.
There is going to be starvation in many of these countries and they will quite rightly blame us for it. Oh, there will be plenty of blame to go around, Putin will be in for his fair share, too. However, we do have the surplus we could export to them if we weren't feeding it to cows and pigs, instead.
I don't iknow what the fallout will be, I'm just glad I won't be here to see most of it. There are occasional advantages to age.
C Moon
(12,208 posts)mahina
(17,615 posts)I thought the opposite was true.
C Moon
(12,208 posts)This is just one link, but I hope you have looked it up yourself. But Im guessing you didnt bother.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/foodtank.com/news/2013/12/why-meat-eats-resources/amp/
I was inquiring, open minded, still am, but wow you are a delight. Bye now.
marybourg
(12,584 posts)you inappropriately personally attacked a poster for mildly questioning your misstated fact.
IbogaProject
(2,786 posts)Hi, that link you posted says Beef takes 1,800 gallons of water per pound produced. Soybeans take 206 gallons per pound produced.
Turbineguy
(37,285 posts)"Shock is reasonable after discovering that the global average water footprint or the total amount of water needed to produce one pound of beef is 1,800 gallons of water; one pound of pork takes 718 gallons of water. As a comparison, the water footprint of soybeans is 206 gallons; corn is 108 gallons."
muriel_volestrangler
(101,265 posts)Your link in the later post certainly says more - 1800 to 206.
jimfields33
(15,678 posts)They take up water like crazy. If we just limit our numbers avocado intake, wed all be closer to fixing the problems.
Hekate
(90,550 posts)jimfields33
(15,678 posts)And its never easy to sacrifice but it does help matters.
melm00se
(4,984 posts)faced during WWII.
Britain was a net importer of food and the NAZI blockade choked food supplies.
The British government ordered a culling of livestock only leaving milk producing animals and highly efficient animals and shifting over to a diet more focused on plants than meat (but there was some meat production for the armed forces and rationed meat for the general public).
There were significant impacts to this:
- the British farmland (both existing and reclaimed) was rapidly depleted of soil nutrients as the war entered 1943 and the growth of farm yields slowed dramatically only offset by the increase in cultivated land and the tide turning in the Atlantic.
- there were several pig breeds that were completely wiped out during the cull.
- many British culled their pets due to forecasted food shortages and a pamphlet from National Air Raid Precautions Animals Committee who suggesting putting down pets would be the most humane thing to do.
Hekate
(90,550 posts)
not so much. We are about to see famines again some caused by war, and some caused by global climate change.
Warpy
(111,135 posts)The Great Plains are about to start becoming unsuitable for agriculture now that the Ogallal Aquifer is running very low.
If we're smart, we'll replant native grasses to anchor the soil. If we're stupid, it will become desert.
roamer65
(36,744 posts)Also southern Ontario and further north of it.
Warpy
(111,135 posts)Weather patterns will still bring them rainfall from the Gulf. Anything west will do for animal herds but those huge corporate farms have seen their glory days come and go.
roamer65
(36,744 posts)Northern part of the Great Plains will probably stay agriculturally inclined, but the mid to southern part I highly doubt it.
Grazing land at best as you say.
Warpy
(111,135 posts)Plus whatever comes out of the mountains for summer grazing. Bison will eventually run 'em off Bison are mean fuckers.
Here is an example of how close you can get: https://www.flickr.com/photos/yellowstonenps/49945321238/in/photostream/ Notice thedifference in posture in the bison distancing picture.
Wouldnt surprise if they crossbreed.
NH Ethylene
(30,803 posts)and produce fertile offspring.
Warpy
(111,135 posts)but offspring will all be sterile. See below.
NH Ethylene
(30,803 posts)That's really interesting.
Warpy
(111,135 posts)What you get is a mean as hell head of cattle with tough, low fat meat and can't make more cattle. Enough cross breeding would make both species extinct, and that's why it has to be done with a lot of help from humans.
littlemissmartypants
(22,548 posts)Going to be accelerated by world events. "Good training." as a friend of mine used to say.
Baked Potato
(7,733 posts)Oh, and big corporations, how about helping out with this apocalypse thing coming.
🤔
JHC.
DanieRains
(4,619 posts)Good Luck.
cstanleytech
(26,224 posts)needed is for there to be more diversification in the types of food we grow dependent on the region your looking to grow in.
Just to bad we cannot plant and grow crops (other than kelp) in the ocean as that is a rather large area of the planet that is rather useless when it comes to planting and harvesting crops for the most part.
raccoon
(31,105 posts)NickB79
(19,224 posts)And inland areas are struggling to find enough water to irrigate with.
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/rice-agriculture-feeds-world-climate-change-drought-flood-risk
cstanleytech
(26,224 posts)Deuxcents
(16,080 posts)Now were gonna know what our leaders refused to even consider. Water issues Droughts. Heat. More extreme tornadoes n hurricanes. More fires consuming everything in its path. Wildlife n marine life wont be able to sustain us. Its joust becoming gloom n doom and it aint pretty or cheap.
DanieRains
(4,619 posts)Screw the kiddies over.
They get to pay for our carbon.
cstanleytech
(26,224 posts)need rain and drought tends to reduce the chance of those occurring.
Lonestarblue
(9,958 posts)The UN should declare a humanitarian crisis and put together a force to protect Ukrainian grain ships. Either Russia lets them through or Russian ships get sunk. Putin needs to be stopped instead of letting this war drag on and on. The world could end up in another sever depression.
If its true that Putin has cancer, he could decide that he has nothing to lose by pulling out the nukes, but his generals and other leaders might refuse to use them since they know the retaliation would be swift. Would they really be ready to die for a delusional man who might not be around much longer? Tough question to answer. I sure dont envy world leaders today who have to deal with Putins threats.
dalton99a
(81,391 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,044 posts)Materialistic people made their spending choices. This was baked in the pie years ago.
hueymahl
(2,447 posts)They might have to eat steak less often, but that is it.
NickB79
(19,224 posts)I'm 42. I'm 100% certain we'll see food rationing, millions of American climate refugees, and widespread hunger in the US directly due to climate change in my lifetime. Climate change isn't going to stop in this century. Large swathes of the US will be uninhabitable within 50 years due to heat, drought, sea level rise and wildfires.
Someone with a McMansion in Arizona that suddenly finds their water supply is gone, or in Florida and their living room flooding at high tide, and their house now unsaleable and worthless, could easily go from middle class to destitute in a matter of years. Just look back to the Great Depression to see how fast people's fortunes changed.
FakeNoose
(32,577 posts)For the last 70 or 80 years, northerners have retired and moved to the South where it's warmer, sunnier, and tax-free. Very soon that's all going to change. The migrations will return northward, even up into Canada for livable temperatures and reliable rainfalls. Those that haven't already moved will soon find that they can't sell their Southern retirement properties for any price, let alone a "ka-ching! rake-it-in" price. When they do move north they will find that jobs are scarce and affordable property will be even more scarce.
I know that I probably won't live to see it because I'm already 71. BUT I worry for my son and my grandson who will certainly have to deal with this. It's going to get ugly and scary.
David__77
(23,320 posts)
RicROC
(1,203 posts)Last edited Tue May 17, 2022, 10:59 PM - Edit history (1)
https://squarefootgardening.orgroamer65
(36,744 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,137 posts)The period immediately after it is messing with it.
AwakeAtLast
(14,122 posts)They'll find a way to pin it on him somehow, I'm sure. They've done a fine job of blaming him for the inflation here in the USA.
Vogon_Glory
(9,109 posts)Most conservative voters these days know less about business and economics than egg factory chickens.
melm00se
(4,984 posts)vertical in nature.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/06/business/vertical-farms-food.html
is a recent article on this topic
roamer65
(36,744 posts)Cretaceous here we come!
cagefreesoylentgreen
(838 posts)Akoto
(4,266 posts)Hey, cyberpunk novels always said the Earth of the future would be living on foods made out of soy, whether it tasted like it or not. Agroponics and aquaponics are interesting to consider, though. Some of the components for growth can be recycled for later crops, even. The nutrient sources are very sustainable.
Right now, living without meat is still NOT cheap. I see people advocating that above. It may help them reduce their bills, but those bills will still be big. I don't eat any meat now, not even chicken. Stocking my shelves with boxes of rice Chex, some fruit and other stuff, takes all of my food stamp funds (I am physically disabled) plus cash from my monthly stipend. It's tough.
If people just dropped meat right now, it would make no difference. It needs to be a gradual shift to a balance, I think. New growers of produce have to get started, or else everyone suddenly flooding the aisles for non-meat foods would make those just as costly due to shortages.