Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Polybius

(15,381 posts)
Tue May 24, 2022, 02:01 PM May 2022

Search for Supreme Court leaker falls to former Army colonel

Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — When Gail Curley began her job as Marshal of the U.S. Supreme Court less than a year ago, she would have expected to work mostly behind the scenes: overseeing the court’s police force and the operations of the marble-columned building where the justices work.

Her most public role was supposed to be in the courtroom, where the Marshal bangs a gavel and announces the entrance of the court’s nine justices. Her brief script includes “Oyez! Oyez! Oyez!” — meaning “hear ye” — and concludes, “God save the United States and this Honorable Court.”

Earlier this month, however, Curley was handed a bombshell of an assignment, overseeing an unprecedented breach of Supreme Court secrecy, the leak of a draft opinion and apparent votes in a major abortion case. Leaks to Politico suggest that the court seems ready to overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that women have a constitutional right to abortion. That has sparked protests and round-the-clock security at justices’ homes,demonstrations at the court and concerns about violence following the court’s ultimate decision.

People who know Curley, 53, described the former Army colonel and military lawyer as possessing the right temperament for a highly charged leak investigation: smart, private, apolitical and unlikely to be intimidated.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-leak-investigation-gail-curley-48623ac2a3bafe36f39bbf5f68257dbf



15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Search for Supreme Court leaker falls to former Army colonel (Original Post) Polybius May 2022 OP
If it's Ginni we'll never know about it. Ocelot II May 2022 #1
If it is any R, we will never know about it. Irish_Dem May 2022 #2
I thought no law was broken by leaking the draft opinion? MontanaMama May 2022 #3
Any word on if she'll use spectral evidence? ck4829 May 2022 #4
Why? JustAnotherGen May 2022 #5
The R/W is desperate to keep SOMETHING in the news besides Ginny and Roe.... groundloop May 2022 #10
I know he did JustAnotherGen May 2022 #11
Can she waterboard SC justices who voted in favor of torture? Sancho May 2022 #6
Fake news. lark May 2022 #7
I know - it's just fucking pathetic. harumph May 2022 #8
Could someone quote the law that was broken here? usonian May 2022 #9
Here's a hint Last name is Thomas. gibraltar72 May 2022 #12
What's she going to do if it's Ginny Thomas? kimbutgar May 2022 #13
If she finds out who leaked it, she'll report it to Roberts. JustABozoOnThisBus May 2022 #14
Appointed to protect and cover up for the conservative who leaked it ZonkerHarris May 2022 #15

MontanaMama

(23,307 posts)
3. I thought no law was broken by leaking the draft opinion?
Tue May 24, 2022, 02:14 PM
May 2022

This seems like a distraction. It's Ginni, imho.

JustAnotherGen

(31,810 posts)
5. Why?
Tue May 24, 2022, 02:36 PM
May 2022

Last edited Tue May 24, 2022, 04:22 PM - Edit history (1)

Seriously- not YOU - you are fine posting this . . .

But why is the media running with the leaker story and not the Virginia Thomas is a dirtbag treasonous asshole story?

groundloop

(11,518 posts)
10. The R/W is desperate to keep SOMETHING in the news besides Ginny and Roe....
Tue May 24, 2022, 03:50 PM
May 2022

If they can gin up enough outrage amongst their base they have a better chance of doing well in November, and there's nothing like a good scandal to do just that.

And I equally suspect either Ginny or else Kavanaugh. We all know about Ginny, but some folks don't yet realize that Kavanaugh worked for Ken Starr and was the designated leaker when Starr wanted to put out bits and pieces of information that might make Bill Clinton look bad.

JustAnotherGen

(31,810 posts)
11. I know he did
Tue May 24, 2022, 04:24 PM
May 2022

But I'm just in an "I don't care mode". The number one risk to the SCOTUS's reputation is Thomas and his wife. Even more so than the beer guy.

I suspect some of the 'speaking out of school' Thomas has been doing lately about 'trust' and when the court was great (before Roberts) is because Roberts is hammering him continously.

lark

(23,091 posts)
7. Fake news.
Tue May 24, 2022, 02:54 PM
May 2022

She won't find out because they did it themselves or else the spouse did it. R's are nothing but lying hypocrites and SCOTUS is full of the worst of the worst christofascists. Alito won't be happy until he's stolen every right from women, with contrapception coming next.

harumph

(1,898 posts)
8. I know - it's just fucking pathetic.
Tue May 24, 2022, 03:07 PM
May 2022

I feel for the colonel though - being sent on a snipe hunt.

usonian

(9,772 posts)
9. Could someone quote the law that was broken here?
Tue May 24, 2022, 03:20 PM
May 2022

If there is no law, this is about as significant as some pissed-off H.R. type suing someone for for breach of company rules or employment "agreement". I say that because such agreements vary, most not being formal contracts. If civil service rules apply here, I have no knowledge of such.

In a more cynical sense, someone "went against the family"

The one thing that is clear is that only one person is beyond reproach, and hence .....

kimbutgar

(21,130 posts)
13. What's she going to do if it's Ginny Thomas?
Tue May 24, 2022, 06:43 PM
May 2022

I think when Clarence was in the hospital she went into his computer and found the opinion.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,338 posts)
14. If she finds out who leaked it, she'll report it to Roberts.
Tue May 24, 2022, 08:06 PM
May 2022

Then, if the leaker is a justice, or married to a justice, the matter will be squashed. They're looking for some mid-level clerk to take the fall. Nothing wrong with the Roberts court, see?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Search for Supreme Court ...