Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 12:54 PM Jan 2013

Capital Eye Opener, Jan. 2: Bennett Poised to Register as Lobbyist After Sounding Off, and AIG Paves

Source: opensecrets.org

Former Sen. Bob Bennett (R-Utah) will officially register as a lobbyist tomorrow and he's coming out swinging -- at limits on former lawmakers becoming lobbyists.

As it stands, former members of the House of Representatives must wait one year after leaving office to become registered lobbyists; former senators must wait two full years. Tomorrow, Jan. 3, marks two years to the day since Bennett left office, and he has told his hometown paper that he will be registering in the afternoon.

But the ban that made him wait two years is a "really bad idea," Bennett told the paper, and an example of the "let’s-punish-politicians-for-being-politicians attitude."

In the interview Bennett dismissed the idea that, as a former senator, he would get unusual access to lawmakers he now will lobby. But the reality is that an important reason former members of Congress are highly prized by K Street firms (Bennett will be joining Arent Fox) is precisely because they do have special privileges.

...........

Read more: http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2013/01/capital-eye-opener-january-2.html



No surprise here.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Capital Eye Opener, Jan. 2: Bennett Poised to Register as Lobbyist After Sounding Off, and AIG Paves (Original Post) Coyotl Jan 2013 OP
Bennett proves it should be increased to 5 years. Renew Deal Jan 2013 #1
I agree. The two year ban is a bad idea. Salviati Jan 2013 #2
You're right, Bennett - it's a bad idea. It's not long enough. Panasonic Jan 2013 #3
What are they worried about? Turbineguy Jan 2013 #4
Ban should be permanent. Octafish Jan 2013 #5
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Jan 2013 #6

Turbineguy

(37,319 posts)
4. What are they worried about?
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 05:49 PM
Jan 2013

That they will lose their touch? That they will have to get re-trained on how to screw over the country?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Capital Eye Opener, Jan. ...