House GOP blocks Violence Against Women Act
Source: Maddow Blog
Congress had a lengthy to-do list as the end of the year approached, with a series of measures that needed action before 2013 began. Some of the items passed (a fiscal agreement, a temporary farm bill), while others didnt (relief funding for victims of Hurricane Sandy).
And then theres the Violence Against Women Act, which was supposed to be one of the years easy ones. It wasnt.
Back in April, the Senate approved VAWA reauthorization fairly easily, with a 68 to 31 vote. The bill was co-written by a liberal Democrat (Vermonts Pat Leahy) and a conservative Republican (Idahos Mike Crapo), and seemed on track to be reauthorized without much of a fuss, just as it was in 2000 and 2005.
But House Republicans insisted the bill is too supportive of immigrants, the LGBT community, and Native Americans and theyd rather let the law expire than approve a slightly expanded proposal. Vice President Biden, who helped write the original law, tried to persuade House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) to keep the law alive, but the efforts didnt go anywhere.
Read more: http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/01/02/16305284-house-gop-blocks-violence-against-women-act?lite
What a bunch of cowardly, subhuman fucking fuckheads.
Panasonic
(2,921 posts)And it will be a massive loss.
I don't care about the gerrymanders - all the voters WANT to know the truth. And we need to pound the ground educating these low-information voters and let them know that the Republicans are responsible on what is ailing them.
barbtries
(28,787 posts)i am always amazed at how many people in this country are not just embarrassed to death to be republicans. i keep thinking they should be running, sprinting into the democratic party. it's going to take a lot to get these people to turn off their corporate media which feeds them a steady diet of bullshit and actually pay attention to what's going on.
lexw
(804 posts)...and my in-laws were most likely given aid when they immigrated here decades ago.
Today they are they types who think, pretend and vote like they are in the 1%. Can't figure that one out.
Flybywire
(7 posts)About my uncle and father-in-laws emails: Their goal has been to spam my email until I think that they are disgusting, immoral creeps and they have succeeded. Today however, I had to write back after the same crap I've got from them over and over again about blaming the poorest and most vulnerable for the country's problems. It is NOTHING BUT BULLYING and I told them so. Does the bully in the playground blame the large football jock for his problems? No. He beats up the skinny little black child and brags about it.
I feel good that I've finally told them what I think about them.
lexw
(804 posts)Tigress DEM
(7,887 posts)barbtries
(28,787 posts)it can't be allowed to just disappear.
gawd i hate republicans, they're such bastards. grrr
Richardo
(38,391 posts)If Boehner somehow survives he'll be too cowed to bring it for a vote.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)and shit-eating-grin Eric Cantor is waiting in the wings. The decision was probably made long ago. Yeah, he will probably not let the VAWA come to a vote.
That's news to, well, pretty much everyone but, apparently, you. Where did you get that info?
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... but I just went to look for it and it's not there now... Will look some more on the latest threads... Maybe it wasn't corroborated, so they took it down?
ReRe
(10,597 posts)...on latest threads...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022119234
ReRe
(10,597 posts)...on Home page...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022119005
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)..but just now went back and looked for it and it's gone. Will go look on the latest threads and see if I can find it. Maybe it was taken down because it was uncorroborated? I did see it, though... Will keep looking and try to get back here and post a link to it... Sorry...
ReRe
(10,597 posts)...latest threads in reference to the evident "rumor"...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022119234
ReRe
(10,597 posts)...I seen on the front page of DU:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022119005
Berlum
(7,044 posts)florida08
(4,106 posts)that have been elected to the Peoples House. Apparently it's now the House of horrors.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)...question.
onenote
(42,688 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,667 posts)And NO to the Violence Against Women Act.
And FUCK YOU to every damn thing that would actually help people who aren't already filthy rich.
John Kenneth Galbraith said it best: "The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness."
oldbanjo
(690 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,667 posts)KansDem
(28,498 posts)'Rule or Ruin'
This way beyond "The Party of No" This is active deliberate destruction.
The GOP is indeed the Party of "Rule or Ruin."
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Seriously. I have nothing but contempt for these people at this point.
Ohio Joe
(21,748 posts)DreamGypsy
(2,252 posts)...a quote from the great Republican Abraham Lincoln, in his Cooper Union Speech before he was selected as the presidential candidate for his party:
Pretty well describes how Cantor/Boehner and their ilk view the mission.
Also from the blog:
"The House Republican leadership's failure to take up and pass the Senate's bipartisan and inclusive VAWA bill is inexcusable. This is a bill that passed with 68 votes in the Senate and that extends the bill's protections to 30 million more women. But this seems to be how House Republican leadership operates. No matter how broad the bipartisan support, no matter who gets hurt in the process, the politics of the right wing of their party always comes first."
The VAWA must be taken up again when the lame ducks fly away.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)Flybywire
(7 posts)Sounds vulgar but, I hear very similar things spewing from Tea Partier's mouths.
Flybywire
(7 posts)Why did this remind me of Tea Party Congressmen?
<http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/saudi_religious_leader_calls_for_gang_rape_of_syrian_women/>
Will the USA speak out against this immoral attitude? NO. Because oil money ties us together. Never say anything bad about the Saudis. Conservatives still continue to lie to themselves and us that all the hijackers came from Afghanistan instead of where they actually came from. Don't upset the Saudi creeps. No. Can't do that.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)with her partner who she lived with. She doesn't have the same rights as a wife against her MALE husband? Assault is assault regardless of the gender of abuser. Fortunately, she lived in NY and it was treated as a domestic abuse situation. It should not matter where a woman lives; North, South, or Native Reservation either.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)NICO9000
(970 posts)Their hatred of everyone but rich white men is obvious to anyone with a working brain.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)They have got to go. The GOP clearly does not work for anyone but old, extremely rich, white Christian men. They are obsolete.
The Magistrate
(95,244 posts)"The only good Republicans I ever saw are dead."
AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)niyad
(113,243 posts)for women. their successes in the last few years have emboldened them to the point that they do not even have to pretend in the slightest anymore.
they are beginning to remind me of hyras--you cut off the heads (vote them out) and two more, even crazier, even more hate-filled, seem to take their place.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)...it never ended.
Period.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)...because they support the rapers/assaulters. And of course, Patti Murray will have to slap a new number on it and resubmit it in the Senate and get it rolling again in the 113th Congress. And she will. And THEN, if Speaker Cantor (I assume he will be swept into Speakership) won't let it come to a vote, every female Democrat needs to stand on the corners of his district in NC and make a BIG NOISE. If he won't let the VAWA come to a vote, then he himself is a raper/assaulter of women everywhere!
Disconnect
(33 posts)I was in a heterosexual relationship with an abusive female and got NO help from VAWA. If a law is to be funded by public money it should protect ALL from domestic abuse, not just human females!!!!
thebard77
(37 posts)Men rarely believe other men when it comes to issues of domestic abuse and violence. We are wired to automatically believe women in cases of abuse. Women also sympathize directly with other women. It is a product of our social evolution. Compound this with the concept of "proper manly behavior" and you have an entire society that is hell bent to not believe that an abused man needs help. For what its worth, I'm sorry that happened to you. Its not right and its not fair.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)With all due respect to the many men who do get it about violence against women, far too many men -- especially those idiot Republicans -- just haven't a clue.
LW1977
(1,233 posts)This happened because Obama caved somehow blah blah blah
Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)april
(1,148 posts)liberalhistorian
(20,816 posts)native american tribal jurisdiction over non-member DV offenders. Right now, tribal courts have no jurisdiction over non-native and non-member offenders; only the U.S. Attorney's office for that particular district has jurisdiction. But said federal prosecutors are often not interested in prosecuting non-natives (who are primarily white, although not always), especially if it's a misdemeanor offense. They're too busy putting the screws to Indians for even minor drug offenses to bother with non-Indians who abuse, assault, rape and beat the shit out of Indian women. Indian women basically have to be killed or mortally wounded for them to bother with said prosecution.
But the GOP doesn't want tribes to have jurisdiction over non-members (again, mainly white men), despite the fact that DV and assaults/rapes against Indian women are at an all-time high and the main perpetrators are white men. Motherfuckers doesn't even begin to describe them.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)stultusporcos
(327 posts)and those that vote for them can be reasoned with.
F it just give them the former Confederacy and we go our separate ways.
It has become entirely pointless to even deal with them anymore.
Yes in case you ask this is the most civil solution to the problem of the red states I have and would support.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)what is wrong with these sick bastards?
liberalhistorian
(20,816 posts)and hubby's an attorney in tribal law. We've seen firsthand the rampant DV and assaults that Indian women are suffering, but too much of the time nothing is done because the perpetrators are non-natives (mainly white men) and tribal courts have no jurisdiction over them. But the district's U.S. Attorney, who DOES have jurisdiction, often doesn't bother with prosecution; they're too busy putting the screws to Indians for even misdemeanor drug charges to bother with prosecuting whites who rape, assault, or beat the shit out of Indian women. They often have to be killed or mortally wounded before such prosecution will take place. Non-members know this and often take advantage of it.
The new version of the VAWA included giving tribal courts jurisdiction over non-member offenders and that is what the goddamned scum-sucking women-and-minority-and-minority-women-hating GOP was against, and the main sticking point. www.Indianz.com had a great op-ed the other day entitled "GOP protecting white men from prosecution", which is pretty much what it's all about. I have no words for these fuckers or for the damage they are responsible for perpetuating.
Great Caesars Ghost
(532 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)This was also a bit of a way to slide the knife into Biden? VAWA is arguably his greatest legacy short of being the VP.
catbyte
(34,367 posts)Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)Cha
(297,123 posts)Response to Richardo (Original post)
thebard77 This message was self-deleted by its author.