‘Firearms instructor’ hired as school guard leaves handgun in student bathroom
Source: Rawstory.com
A prosecutor in Lapeer, Michigan says, No harm, no foul, after a charter school took the National Rifle Associations (NRA) advice and hired a armed security guard who promptly left his handgun unattended in a student bathroom.
Chatfield School co-directors Matt Young and Bill Kraly announced last week that they had hired retired Lapeer County Sheriffs Dept. firearms instructor Clark Arnold as a security guard in response to the December mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. Its a tremendous asset to the safety of our students, Young told WNEM in a report that aired on Tuesday.
But by Wednesday, the school had admitted to The Flint Journal that the retired firearms instructor had made a made a breach in security protocol and left his unloaded handgun unattended in the school restroom for a few moments.
The school has put additional security procedures in place that follow local law enforcement practices and guidelines, a statement from Young said. At no time was any student involved in this breach of protocol. We will continue to work on improving school security. The school director insisted that the incident had been reported to authorities, but said that any repercussions for the newly hired guard were a personnel matter.
Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/18/newly-hired-school-guard-leaves-unattended-handgun-in-student-bathroom/
Paulie
(8,462 posts)Bullshit that it was unloaded or that an unloaded guard gun is anything but theater for the NRA nuts. School admin should be fired but its an unaccountable charter.
benld74
(9,904 posts)this "unloaded" bull is to try and convince you that shit don't really stink!
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)Ok I know I just aged myself but it was worth it
anyone else remember that line from Andy Griffth?
tularetom
(23,664 posts)As far as I know stupidity and incompetence are not felonies.
But the school would be making a mistake not to immediately terminate this buffoon and consider paying a bit more to get someone who actually knows what the fuck he's doing.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)caseymoz
(5,763 posts). . . he would have been charged with something even if "stupidity and incompetence are not felonies." Admit it; you'd probably change your tune if that happened.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)If a kid had been shot with the gun this asshole left in the bathroom a crime would have been committed and it would be proper for a prosecutor to get involved. But a kid wasn't shot and that's my point.
As it stands there is no crime and therefore no need for prosecution.
The school can and should deal with this as a personnel matter. In other words, fire this clown.
caseymoz
(5,763 posts)What I'm saying is, it would have been the very same act of negligence whether a kid would have been killed or not-- that's the real crime. We try people for attempted murder or theft. We made drunk driving a crime whether you kill somebody doing it or not.The deciding factor on whether he should be tried here seems to be not whether a negligent crime took place, because it definitely did; it's really in how much the consequences pissed people off.
tblue
(16,350 posts)means you are infallible. Guards are human and humans make mistakes, have issues, break down, have had bad childhoods and horrible weekends, overreact at times, get pissed at bad kids. Same as anybody. You don't put a gun in a school. Period.
oldbanjo
(690 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)That he was a police officer non-relevant?
onehandle
(51,122 posts)samsingh
(17,595 posts)law of entropy
Beartracks
(12,809 posts)Can I use that phrase?
=================
samsingh
(17,595 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,579 posts)Only more guns will take care of this problem.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)ajk2821
(89 posts)We read and hear stories about people leaving laptops with national security information in Starbucks and other places. People leave their phones all over the place and find their private pictures leaked all over the internet. People make mistakes and leave things. If for no other reason than that one, schools do not need armed guards in them. This could have been horribly worse.
oldbanjo
(690 posts)ancianita
(36,034 posts)I'm no NRA supporter, either. But consider:
A structural flaw in a vast number of schools is bathrooms. Adults should not be sharing bathrooms with the student body (heh heh). Schools must remodel or re-purpose space for separate adult bathrooms. Then, if this happens, as it does with people who simply have 'too much to remember' in such high-stimulation environments, a student wouldn't have access to it. Such a structural change has the same justification as teacher lounges, offices, meeting rooms, etc.
For it to work everywhere else, people everywhere else have to stop cheaping out on their schools' bathroom structures. (I know how that sounds...) Forcing adults and students to use the same bathrooms is plain trashy stupid. It confuses students about the seriousness of the adult/child and student/teacher separation that help students understand adult boundaries.
I'm anti-NRA. But armed security at entrances/exits has worked in Chicago's hundreds of schools for the last fifteen years. Entrance/Exit armed security in the third largest city in the country, with NO within-school killings -- proves that armed security in schools does work -- when implemented correctly with qualified personnel.
Americans have to stop cheaping out on security personnel. Americans' school districts must, must stop leaving schools defenseless because some fake adult administrators and politicians screw up on the proper implementation of armed security for their school children.
SpankMe
(2,957 posts)My son's elementary school has this. There are students-only bathrooms and adults/staff-only bathrooms. The rationale is pedophilia, not guns, but still.
Also, armed security makes sense at tough, inner city schools like in Chicago, L.A., NYC, etc. owing to gang problems and the like. Few are against that.
But changing the paradigm to put armed guards in "every school in America" isn't the way to go. The security profiles should match the school's environment and needs.
ancianita
(36,034 posts)Newtown didn't. Everyone's kids shouldn't be subject to bad adult judgment.
Schools in Chicago are NOT full of "tough" kids "owing to gang problems." They are full of kids. Their world is no more full of guns than is the world of Newtown kids. Seeing an armed guard at entrance/exits in a school doesn't kill kids. Not having a guard because of ego needs of the appearance of safety has killed and continues to kill kids in schools.
Changing any paradigm means adapting to new realities. The majority of parents should investigate their communities and vote for the best security practices for ALL kids. One kid's parents' denial of risk shouldn't be the risk that another kid bears. Better for all to have the security and not need it than to need it and not have it.
If you want to frame this argument as an individual school issue, fine by me. Then each community and individual school should grieve about its mistakes and dead children alone. That's exactly what the NRA would like.
oldbanjo
(690 posts)They make a lot of arrests during the year. This is a rural area and the nearest City has about 6,000 people.
ancianita
(36,034 posts)DWinNJ
(261 posts)Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)but this was a charter school, which means they can have the classes taught in the bathrooms with rifles as pointers and no one can do a thing about it because there is no accountability.
ancianita
(36,034 posts)Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)in practice, they can do pretty much whatever they want.
ancianita
(36,034 posts)can be accused of being lazy, although in all fairness, professional trustworthiness should rightly be assumed until proven otherwise.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)it sounds like it, but it also kinda sounds like you're placing the blame on the public. Of course that's the line they use to avoid any kind of oversight so it could go either way. Charter schools are run like businesses with public funds and so many road blocks to accountability, from fund allocation, to curriculum, to enrollment, and there isn't much we can do about it because no one aside from teachers, and their allies care that going on 2 generations of children are being deprived of their education, and that will only beget more generations, etc, et el.
It's a somewhat passionate issue for me, and all I can really do is rant on the internet to the choir.
ancianita
(36,034 posts)services that have visibly eroded over two generations. Maybe we don't agree on what schools should be. I don't accept charter schools as any viable alternative schooling choice for the public, especially since public schools have never been properly funded in the first place.
Public schooling is absolutely not a business but the public, so enamored with the rich, believe everything the rich and their patronage henchmen tell them to think. The rich never treat their kids' schools as businesses because they know that human capacity building isn't widget making. There should be no public subsidy of private profit.
The whole funding boondoggle politically named "reform" should be taken to court to disallow public funding of business-styled schools.
Charters pretty much say to the public what Romney said: "Don't ask me what the plan and the outcome will be right now. I'll let you know after I get the job."
As for using the internet to rant on pet issues, we have that in common.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)I just learned today that my Governor wants to force 75% or so of public collages to online only, skyrocket tuition, gut grants, and generally make it night impossible to get an education in this state, which not 20 years ago had some of the best public education in the nation.
The public is partially to blame, but we are so overloaded with so much on a daily basis it's far too easy to miss things. Not even little things, but huge issues can completely slip by. I used to know every movie coming out, but these days there are major blockbusters and award winners that I have never heard of, and these are movies that I would really want to see. I'm a rather smart and observant person, so I can imagine how difficult it must be for the majority.
On top of that each individual is given ten different opinions and left to their own devices on what is the truth, when 9 of those things are lies, and the one true nugget is barely mentioned. All those "Both sides do it" "two equal sides to this story" and other strawmans that we all know too well.
So yes, partially the public is to blame, but when there is a nice smiling man who is swearing ten times to Sunday that he is telling the truth, and he would sooner cut off his own arm than lie, and it's not just one man, but 100 all saying the same thing, then it puts it in a bit of perspective. I place the blame on the liars, not the people who were lied to. Jail the criminals, not the victims.
ancianita
(36,034 posts)help them determine their own levels of gullibility, credible information and the senders' credible authority. It's the old Aristotelian model of rhetoric, and that's just one reliable model. The problem is that given the 1st Amendment, we can't jail anyone for lying. We have to prove all claims of fraud, and yet racketeers can claim simple stupidity when any case gets made that points to their fraudulent intentions. It used to take decades for the signal of truth to gain traction in the white noise of economic and political racketeering, but now it's only taking a fraction of that.
Still. Business has decided that humans are widgets. If capitalists can't take the competition that comes from a fairer system of upward mobility through schooling, then they need to be driven out of the halls of public institutions and keep their vampire squid hands off our tax monies for kids and public services; they need to be made to stay out there in the red tooth and claw world of their 'free' markets. Our schools are being ruined because capitalists have turned to other countries' grads' expertise. Our people are no longer the spending priority of their own state and federal governments.
We need to push hard to drive the money out of politics and reclaim a curriculum that serves all people well.
malthaussen
(17,193 posts)... who was chalking lines around the perimeters of his club? When asked why he was doing it, he said, "To keep the lions out of England!"
"But there are no lions in England!"
"See? It works."
-- Mal
Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)if the security guard had been armed.
louis-t
(23,292 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)ancianita
(36,034 posts)Big cities are the first place to come under fire if such shootings were to happen.
Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)Get one.
I wouldn't snark this if people died or were injured. Yes, it's serious, but if you have a problem with remarks like this, about a situation where someone was EXTEMELY stupid, but no one got hurt, I suggest you NEVER watch The Daily Show or The Colbert Report.
ancianita
(36,034 posts)Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)right over your head.
Enjoy your humorless life.
ancianita
(36,034 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)There are guards, there are metal detectors, there are locked doors. But there are holes in the security, big ones.
ancianita
(36,034 posts)Chicago high schools have them, which really helps ID trespassers. Each school has many exits but only one main entrance. The large high schools with many doors have only one entrance per building. There are internal cameras in remote areas, paid for through fundraising groups -- alums, community people and the Local School Council.
catbyte
(34,376 posts)And in Michigan, too. Figures, LOL.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Chemisse
(30,809 posts)goclark
(30,404 posts)I am in favor of School Security -- just don't think Guns are the answer.
There generally are Security Plans in place for each school.
Without a doubt, each School District is working on a variety of Safety Measures that will address this critical issue.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Chemisse
(30,809 posts)Metal detectors at the doors. Intimidating and prisonlike, but preferable to guns inside the premises.
goclark
(30,404 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)petronius
(26,602 posts)SirRevolutionary
(579 posts)he was a good guy with a gun, who became a good guy without a gun. Then I guess he was a bad guy without a gun until he got his gun back. Then Wayne would tell you the solution here is simple. Just hire another good guy with a gun to watch the first guy with/without his gun and from there... Owwww, my brain hurts now.
thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)jpak
(41,757 posts)yup
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)It's Barney Fife all over again.
lexw
(804 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)supercats
(429 posts)When I read the headline I burst out laughing....Tomorrow I believe is national gun awareness day, (or something like that). So I was thinking that the NRA should arm every student through high school, that shows up on monday, just for the day, so that they can bring ultimate safety to each and every school throughout America, and celebrate national gun awareness day in fashion.....what could go wrong?
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)underpants
(182,788 posts)Newspeak
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)But there was a foul! There was a friggin' gun left in a bathroom!
llmart
(15,536 posts)rightwing, teabagger, gun nutter area.
caseymoz
(5,763 posts). . . or armed teachers to go postal. Let's face it, working with kids takes patience, teachers are underpaid, and the stress and work hours are can be tough.
So, do we really want to hand them the means to kill when they could have a bad moment?
wordpix
(18,652 posts)and you'll have an NRA wet dream
goclark
(30,404 posts)install the weapons in the schools of their children/grandchildren.
Of course the NRA would pay for the Officers -- not the government!