Ford, Nissan, Daimler Agree To ‘Unique’ 3-Way Agreement To Launch First Affordable Fuel Cell Auto...
Source: Auto World News
Ford Motor Company, Nissan Motor Co., and Daimler AG have agreed to a three-way agreement to "accelerate the commercialization" of fuel cell electric vehicles. The companies released a joint press release to announce the news.
The companies are hoping to jointly develop common a fuel cell electric vehicle system while still reducing investment costs associated with the engineering of the technology Ford stated. The three companies will invest equally towards the project.
"Fuel cell electric vehicles are the obvious next step to complement today's battery electric vehicles as our industry embraces more sustainable transportation," said Mitsuhiko Yamashita, Member of the Board of Directors and Executive Vice President of Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., supervising Research and Development in the press release. "We look forward to a future where we can answer many customer needs by adding FCEVs on top of battery EVs within the zero-emission lineup."
Their FCEVs have each logged over 10 million km in test driver around the globe and in all kinds of diverse conditions. The companies plan to develop a common fuel cell stack and fuel cell system that can then be used by each respective company to launch separately branded FCEVs, which also don't produce CO2 while the vehicle is in drive.
Read more: http://www.autoworldnews.com/articles/3053/20130128/ford-nissan-daimler-ag-agree-unique-three-way-agreement-launch-first-affordable-fuel-cell-electric-vehicle-2017.htm
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Next question is, what kind of fuel to run the fuel cells? Could be anything from H2 to methane from chickenshit to hydrocarbons.
adieu
(1,009 posts)The point is that the fuel cells would be far more clean in the exhaust, and may run at over 100 mpg.
tinrobot
(10,893 posts)Hydrogen cars are one thing, fueling infrastructure is another. I hope they are pursuing the refueling side of the equation as well.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)cars. I'll take my 'buggy whip' any day over those stinkers!
lol.
windowpilot
(115 posts)what a misadventure that was...
yurbud
(39,405 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)That is really a method that we have the infrastructure for.
thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)It's not really there either. It's one thing in the suburbs where so many people keep their cars in their garages, which have electric. But elsewhere, including the most congested cities, huge numbers of cars are parked outside overnight, with no access to power.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)That would a great public works project if we as a nation ever get behind them again.
kentauros
(29,414 posts)Here are a few options for charging stations:
WattStation: Yves Behar Designs A Charger Pretty Enough For Any Street
First They Install Solar. Now IKEA is Installing EV Charging at California Store
Charging Up Nissan's Electric Car Without Wires
30 Models of Plug-In Car Chargers Now Available Online via Home Depot
London Expands its Electric Car Charging Points As Part of Transportation Plans
And for electric scooters and motorcycles:
Plug In! First Electric Motorcycle Charging Stations in Barcelona
You can probably find more examples at TreeHugger. I just did a quick search through google
supercats
(429 posts)Finally a coming together of a segment of the auto industry to move forward in thinking and execution!!!
I can't wait to see the cars they produce in several years!!!
Hatchling
(2,323 posts)Waht does this mean for elctric vehicles?
Xithras
(16,191 posts)They're superior to current EV's in that they don't require you to lug a battery around and theoretically have unlimited range. They're inferior in that they require that you add fuel to the vehicle, like a gasoline burner.
The actual amount of pollution generated by fuel cells depends on the input fuel used. A gasoline powered fuel cell still generates some CO2, but it's a fraction of what is generated by regular IC engines, and they can pull more than 100MPG. A hydrogen fuel cell gets similar mileage, and its only pollution is pure water vapor.
As for which is better...it largely depends on where you live. If you live in an urban area and only drive 10-20 miles a day, a PEV is probably a better choice. If you live in the suburbs or commute to work every day, a fuel cell is going to be the best option to replace that smog belcher in your driveway.
The only real question is whether the market will support both PEV's and fuel cell vehicles at the same time. If not, fuel cells wil probably displace PEV's (fuel cells can work for everyone, but PEV's can't).
bananas
(27,509 posts)Hydrogen and oxygen go in, water and electricity come out.
http://americanhistory.si.edu/fuelcells/basics.htm
MAD Dave
(204 posts)I always thought that fuel cell electric vehicles were the future.
The currently one of the biggest hurdles is the fuelling infrastructure for hydrogen. I sincerely doubt that the initial FCEV's will use hydrogen fuel. The fuel cells will likely burn gasoline or E85. As previously mentioned the mileage should initially be near 100 mpg but should increase as the fuel cell technology is developed.
In my opinion, the biggest benefit of the development of FCEV's is the potential production of aftermarket conversion kits for older vehicles. Depending in the size of the actual reaction cell, these conversions could be quite easy to complete as well.