Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,333 posts)
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:30 PM Feb 2012

Dallas-based Komen Foundation apologizes, plans to restore Planned Parenthood grants

Star-Telegram:

Dallas-based Susan G. Komen Foundation posted a Tweet on Friday morning saying it had reversed its decision to pull funding from Planned Parenthood's breast-cancer screening programs.

"Our funding to @PPact clinics continues this year at more than $250k; women served through PP grants will be served still."


Statement from the Komen Foundation CEO:

"We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women's lives.

The events of this week have been deeply unsettling for our supporters, partners and friends and all of us at Susan G. Komen. We have been distressed at the presumption that the changes made to our funding criteria were done for political reasons or to specifically penalize Planned Parenthood. They were not.

Our original desire was to fulfill our fiduciary duty to our donors by not funding grant applications made by organizations under investigation. We will amend the criteria to make clear that disqualifying investigations must be criminal and conclusive in nature and not political. That is what is right and fair.

Our only goal for our granting process is to support women and families in the fight against breast cancer. Amending our criteria will ensure that politics has no place in our grant process. We will continue to fund existing grants, including those of Planned Parenthood, and preserve their eligibility to apply for future grants, while maintaining the ability of our affiliates to make funding decisions that meet the needs of their communities.

It is our hope and we believe it is time for everyone involved to pause, slow down and reflect on how grants can most effectively and directly be administered without controversies that hurt the cause of women. We urge everyone who has participated in this conversation across the country over the last few days to help us move past this issue. We do not want our mission marred or affected by politics - anyone's politics.

Starting this afternoon, we will have calls with our network and key supporters to refocus our attention on our mission and get back to doing our work. We ask for the public's understanding and patience as we gather our Komen affiliates from around the country to determine how to move forward in the best interests of the women and people we serve.

We extend our deepest thanks for the outpouring of support we have received from so many in the past few days and we sincerely hope that these changes will be welcomed by those who have expressed their concern."

73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dallas-based Komen Foundation apologizes, plans to restore Planned Parenthood grants (Original Post) brooklynite Feb 2012 OP
What about the stem cell research funding they cut off in November? The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2012 #1
Yep. They really proved themselves to be untrustworthy. They'll try again to cut this funding ... GodlessBiker Feb 2012 #4
As long as wingnuts are running that outfit The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2012 #51
+1 Phlem Feb 2012 #69
Should absolutely be restored. I assumed it was included. I should know monmouth Feb 2012 #41
PP should take the money but I'll never give another dime to SGK maddezmom Feb 2012 #2
That's gonna be a problem for SGK going forward ProfessionalLeftist Feb 2012 #26
i certainly share it. barbtries Feb 2012 #35
me too: mulsh Feb 2012 #46
Yes. And now the wingnuts are going to avoid them for reversing course. They are screwed. GodlessBiker Feb 2012 #54
They've been exposed, and not just for their rightwing bent at the top Arugula Latte Feb 2012 #39
My thoughts exactly. hamsterjill Feb 2012 #44
Well, how about that? gristy Feb 2012 #3
from the "de-fund the Komen Foundation site": wait to celebrate OKNancy Feb 2012 #5
In other words, Komen is lying again. yardwork Feb 2012 #6
I'm not sure. guess we will have to see what happens next OKNancy Feb 2012 #11
So, they ADMIT their criteria was based on POLITICAL investigations. dixiegrrrrl Feb 2012 #28
Ding Ding Ding Ding...... pkdu Feb 2012 #9
Screw them. denverbill Feb 2012 #7
I've never donated to them Boombaby Feb 2012 #15
wow. barbtries Feb 2012 #37
Too Little, Too Late n/t Lebam in LA Feb 2012 #8
You said it! peace frog Feb 2012 #21
Exactly! n/t snacker Feb 2012 #24
Put the RW on the run, folks. Don't let's let up the pressure on christofascism. kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #10
"christofascism" is a great term LiberalEsto Feb 2012 #45
I've been using it for 10 years. It seems the most appropriate description of them. kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #53
And they think that this will work? LMAO! Why donate any money to an avebury Feb 2012 #12
When that Palin endorsed Handel person is gone from this organization, I will re-assess monmouth Feb 2012 #13
She Should Be Fired otohara Feb 2012 #36
With me you don't get a second chance....... Swede Atlanta Feb 2012 #14
Once a year, my son is forced to wear pink shirts and pink ribbons at his job to support research. SusanaMontana41 Feb 2012 #60
I would wait to see what happens this year Sherman A1 Feb 2012 #61
Until the leadership team (including Brinker and Handel) TBF Feb 2012 #16
In other words, we at Komen are learning how to lie better... MarkCharles Feb 2012 #17
Too late. Bridges burned all the way to teabagger land. n/t BumRushDaShow Feb 2012 #18
not if they fire those responsible for this stupid decision /nt still_one Feb 2012 #27
well... I'm still going to rec this thread OKNancy Feb 2012 #19
What's that saying they have down in Dallas? izquierdista Feb 2012 #20
DUzy yardwork Feb 2012 #23
Hey religious right: LetTimmySmoke Feb 2012 #22
Bloomberg also reported that they are restoring funding to Planned Parenthood. What they should do still_one Feb 2012 #25
Made my day. Great News grantcart Feb 2012 #29
Be Wary - Komen Showed Their True Stripes And Only Backed Down ....... global1 Feb 2012 #30
Go Pound Sand Komen dballance Feb 2012 #31
I spot weasel words in that statement. "Our funding continues this year..." crazylikafox Feb 2012 #32
Smells like WIN to me! PassingFair Feb 2012 #33
Sadly, it's not. Read post #5. Javaman Feb 2012 #49
We've turned over their rock. PassingFair Feb 2012 #50
They've already shown their true colors. nt Cognitive_Resonance Feb 2012 #34
True colors is right! How quickly pink turns to MarkCharles Feb 2012 #38
Unfortunately they just had to add a paragraph which did a little blame shifting....... yellowcanine Feb 2012 #40
When they hired Karen Handel they revealed their politicized agenda young_at_heart Feb 2012 #42
"disqualifying investigations must be criminal and conclusive in nature and not political." KamaAina Feb 2012 #43
Do I sense a little passive aggressiveness with this statement? Hassin Bin Sober Feb 2012 #47
I agree with the poster who said..too little, too late... CherokeeDem Feb 2012 #48
the only news that i want out of Komen Dallas AmandaRuth Feb 2012 #52
Sorry Susan DonCoquixote Feb 2012 #55
nice, I predict another charity will rise to the challenge...Rethink Pink? Demonaut Feb 2012 #56
They need to fire some people UCmeNdc Feb 2012 #57
susan komen FOOTDOK Feb 2012 #58
NEW WORLD RECORD 100m Backpedal.... Evasporque Feb 2012 #59
Good. Now sack the executive staff and replace the board. Robb Feb 2012 #62
I agree - they clearly bowed to their new anti-choice PR person ~AND~ they admit it was political underpants Feb 2012 #65
It was funny, this morning I asked Mrs. Robb if she'd heard about all this Robb Feb 2012 #66
I just told Mrs. Underpants about this underpants Feb 2012 #67
One of the things that bothers me is defunding solely because of an investigation csziggy Feb 2012 #63
TOO LATE Skittles Feb 2012 #64
yep Phlem Feb 2012 #71
It was a Faux Apology. donheld Feb 2012 #68
Our voices count lunatica Feb 2012 #70
Sorry. There's a difference between a mistake and a scheme. caseymoz Feb 2012 #72
don't believe SGK, they are lying lark Feb 2012 #73

GodlessBiker

(6,314 posts)
4. Yep. They really proved themselves to be untrustworthy. They'll try again to cut this funding ...
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:34 PM
Feb 2012

in the dead of night or something.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,587 posts)
51. As long as wingnuts are running that outfit
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 02:01 PM
Feb 2012

they can't be considered a "neutral" charity. There are plenty of other organizations that do breast cancer research and awareness, and those are the ones that deserve our donations unless and until SGK can demonstrate that it doesn't have a right wing agenda.

monmouth

(21,078 posts)
41. Should absolutely be restored. I assumed it was included. I should know
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 01:18 PM
Feb 2012

better than to assume, right?...LOL.

mulsh

(2,959 posts)
46. me too:
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 01:28 PM
Feb 2012

From the Huffington article:

Komen's general counsel, Jonathan Blum, told HuffPost that the fundraising powerhouse tries to be reasonable when dealing with small charities and nonprofits, but that it has a legal duty to protect its more than 200 registered trademarks.

"It's never our goal to shut down a nonprofit," he said, "and we try very hard to be reasonable, but it's still our obligation to make sure that our trademarks are used appropriately so there's no confusion in the marketplace over where people's money is going."


I think the only way to be sure of "where people's money is going" is to no longer give any to Komen.

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
39. They've been exposed, and not just for their rightwing bent at the top
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 01:14 PM
Feb 2012

There is the issue of them using a small percentage toward research, blocking stem cell research, going after others who dare use "...for the cure," etc.

hamsterjill

(15,220 posts)
44. My thoughts exactly.
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 01:23 PM
Feb 2012

While I'll continue to support breast cancer research, I will do it through other avenues.

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
5. from the "de-fund the Komen Foundation site": wait to celebrate
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:35 PM
Feb 2012

From the page De-fund the Komen Foundation:
In light of the "breaking news" that Komen has reversed its decision: PLEASE WAIT TO CELEBRATE.

The official statement issued was that they will "honor existing grants" (which only means they won't demand the already granted money back) and that PP is free to apply again in the future - to which Handel already stated publicly yesterday that even if they apply again, they are unlikely to give them anymore grants due to much of PP's mammography services being referrals to off-site radiology labs and that they are, quote: "moving away from 'pass-through' services."

(In other words, PP is still screwed after SGK finishes giving them the money they owe, but that's IT. Unfortunately this is hardly a "reversal" and after they finish paying out the grant they owe, they are still leaving all the women that PP would be funding out in the cold. Think about that.)

https://www.facebook.com/pages/De-fund-the-Komen-Foundation/171880872914883

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
11. I'm not sure. guess we will have to see what happens next
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:39 PM
Feb 2012

OOPS - I won't delete the statement, but I see it was added by the OP on edit.......


Here is the complete statement

Full text of Komen for the Cure statement from Nancy Brinker and the Susan G. Komen Board of Directors:

"We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women's lives. The events of this week have been deeply unsettling for our supporters, partners and friends and all of us at Susan G. Komen. We have been distressed at the presumption that the changes made to our funding criteria were done for political reasons or to specifically penalize Planned Parenthood. They were not.

"Our original desire was to fulfill our fiduciary duty to our donors by not funding grant applications made by organizations under investigation. We will amend the criteria to make clear that disqualifying investigations must be criminal and conclusive in nature and not political. That is what is right and fair.

"Our only goal for our granting process is to support women and families in the fight against breast cancer. Amending our criteria will ensure that politics has no place in our grant process. We will continue to fund existing grants, including those of Planned Parenthood, and preserve their eligibility to apply for future grants, while maintaining the ability of our affiliates to make funding decisions that meet the needs of their communities.

"It is our hope and we believe it is time for everyone involved to pause, slow down and reflect on how grants can most effectively and directly be administered without controversies that hurt the cause of women. We urge everyone who has participated in this conversation across the country over the last few days to help us move past this issue. We do not want our mission marred or affected by politics - anyone's politics.

"Starting this afternoon, we will have calls with our network and key supporters to refocus our attention on our mission and get back to doing our work. We ask for the public's understanding and patience as we gather our Komen affiliates from around the country to determine how to move forward in the best interests of the women and people we serve.

"We extend our deepest thanks for the outpouring of support we have received from so many in the past few days and we sincerely hope that these changes will be welcomed by those who have expressed their concern.

"Supporters are rallying around Planned Parenthood after renowned breast cancer charity Susan G. Komen for the Cure decided to cut breast screening grants to the reproductive health organization." --

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
28. So, they ADMIT their criteria was based on POLITICAL investigations.
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:55 PM
Feb 2012

Which should have never been a criteria in the first place.

"amend the criteria to make clear that disqualifying investigations must be criminal and conclusive in nature and not political."

denverbill

(11,489 posts)
7. Screw them.
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:37 PM
Feb 2012

I have a friend who had breast cancer. She participated in rallies, raised money for them, etc. They kept offering her help but when she actually asked them for things they had told her they would provide, they never gave her what they promised.

The only way I'd even think about donating to them again is if they wipe out their entire leadership team and appoint some completely non-partisan or even partisan liberal leadership. Given their current makeup, I suspect they are just using the organization as a money-making scam for themselves. Greed is good, after all.

 

Boombaby

(139 posts)
15. I've never donated to them
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:42 PM
Feb 2012

The wife of a close pal of mine used to work there. She quit because---her own words---it's a "scam factory."

peace frog

(5,609 posts)
21. You said it!
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:49 PM
Feb 2012

Komen has proved itself unworthy of our support. In future I'm going straight to the source, Planned Parenthood.

avebury

(10,951 posts)
12. And they think that this will work? LMAO! Why donate any money to an
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:40 PM
Feb 2012

organization that has proven itself to be so untrustworthy.

monmouth

(21,078 posts)
13. When that Palin endorsed Handel person is gone from this organization, I will re-assess
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:41 PM
Feb 2012

the situation, not before.

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
36. She Should Be Fired
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 01:06 PM
Feb 2012

or walk away for this self inflicted PR disaster w/o a golden parachute.

I won't hold my breath.

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
14. With me you don't get a second chance.......
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:41 PM
Feb 2012

Never again any money or support for the pink ribbons. Any money I would normally give to the Race for the Cure will now be given to Planned Parenthood. Sorry Komen, when you thought you could hoodwink the American public into your made up story when we know it was your frothing-at-the-mouth new VP Karen Handel that caused this, you failed. Bye-bye now and forever.

SusanaMontana41

(3,233 posts)
60. Once a year, my son is forced to wear pink shirts and pink ribbons at his job to support research.
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 03:52 PM
Feb 2012

Now we know that the pink ribbons only show support for Komen.

What should he do that won't get him fired?

Corporate America sucks.

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
61. I would wait to see what happens this year
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 04:18 PM
Feb 2012

his workplace may consider it to be too much of a hot potato to proceed this year, however, he should do whatever necessary to keep his job. Wearing a pink shirt is hardly a big deal.

TBF

(32,004 posts)
16. Until the leadership team (including Brinker and Handel)
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:43 PM
Feb 2012

is completely replaced - along with the board that hired them - I have no interest in this reich-wing group.

They can shove their lies.

 

MarkCharles

(2,261 posts)
17. In other words, we at Komen are learning how to lie better...
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:44 PM
Feb 2012

and pull the wool over people's eyes.

We at Komen are fearing for our jobs, and want to keep the $ pouring in.

Let's ask for a full audit of SGK's funds for the last few years, including complete listings of whom they employ at any executive level, and what they are paid.

This is the end of Komen. They cannot be trusted with our money!

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
19. well... I'm still going to rec this thread
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:46 PM
Feb 2012

because no matter how shitty they have been, it's still a win. Even if it is just to make them look more ridiculous.

 

izquierdista

(11,689 posts)
20. What's that saying they have down in Dallas?
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:46 PM
Feb 2012

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice......er,.....fool me, can't get fooled again?

still_one

(92,061 posts)
25. Bloomberg also reported that they are restoring funding to Planned Parenthood. What they should do
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:54 PM
Feb 2012

is fire those involved in the decision to politicize this. Those in charge should only be concerned with what will save lives, not a political agenda, and they should be dismissed


global1

(25,224 posts)
30. Be Wary - Komen Showed Their True Stripes And Only Backed Down .......
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:56 PM
Feb 2012

based on the thought that the backlash from their actions might hurt their ability to fundraise and ultimately the back pockets of their executives.

We know what direction they have been moving toward and that it has political overtones. They still only use about 40% of what they collect for breast cancer research. We know that their executives are highly paid and that they have high administrative costs.

Yes they have shown their true colors. They didn't expect the backlash and media attention that they received from this action on PP. You can bet your boots that if this didn't get the attention that it did - that they would continue to push their political agenda.

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
31. Go Pound Sand Komen
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:57 PM
Feb 2012

You think we're ever going to trust you as a non-partisan organization that really helps women now? Don't be stupid. You are now obviously a political organization that has an agenda that is really not in the best interest of women. Give it a shot trying to deny it. Karen Handel is just a hater. You really need to get rid of her. She is your public policy wonk? With the bias and stupidity she has you really are alienating the world. As you may have noticed with the backlash to your Planed Parenthood decision.

Buh Bye Karen Handel. Go away and please be barren. We certainly don't need people like you reproducing.

crazylikafox

(2,752 posts)
32. I spot weasel words in that statement. "Our funding continues this year..."
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 01:02 PM
Feb 2012

at more than 250k". I thought they had funded over $600,000???? Where's the rest of the money? I think others on this thread are right. They're just counting what they've already spent & trying to buy themselves more time.

PassingFair

(22,434 posts)
33. Smells like WIN to me!
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 01:03 PM
Feb 2012

I'm hoping its an indicator that ethical men and women of the United States
will NEVER allow our country to slip back to the Pre-Roe vs. Wade days.

Way to raise a STINK internets!!!!!!1!

Javaman

(62,500 posts)
49. Sadly, it's not. Read post #5.
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 01:37 PM
Feb 2012

I thought the same thing as you, but sadly, it's all in the wording.

komen will never ever get another dime from me.

My former donation to them now goes directly to Planned parenthood.

yellowcanine

(35,693 posts)
40. Unfortunately they just had to add a paragraph which did a little blame shifting.......
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 01:15 PM
Feb 2012
It is our hope and we believe it is time for everyone involved to pause, slow down and reflect on how grants can most effectively and directly be administered without controversies that hurt the cause of women.


Your actions caused the "controversy" Komen, so what is this talk of "everyone involved"?

The people objecting did NOT cause the controversy. And hate to break it to you Komen, but some heads are going to have to roll or your seriousness about this is still in question.

young_at_heart

(3,763 posts)
42. When they hired Karen Handel they revealed their politicized agenda
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 01:20 PM
Feb 2012

Maybe there will be positive consequences that will force this "foundation" to reassess their manner of "helping" women.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
43. "disqualifying investigations must be criminal and conclusive in nature and not political."
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 01:21 PM
Feb 2012

So what about thr $7.5 million to Penn State?

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,311 posts)
47. Do I sense a little passive aggressiveness with this statement?
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 01:35 PM
Feb 2012
We do not want our mission marred or affected by politics - anyone's politics.



Yep. I do.

It wasn't "anyone's" politics. It was YOUR politics that marred your mission.

CherokeeDem

(3,709 posts)
48. I agree with the poster who said..too little, too late...
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 01:37 PM
Feb 2012

I will donate to Planned Parenthood directly from now on and no more of my money or time will go to the Komen Foundation. I intend on finding another breast cancer organization to devote time and money to after this. We all know that Komen realized what a huge blunder they made...again...too little, too late.

AmandaRuth

(3,105 posts)
52. the only news that i want out of Komen Dallas
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 02:03 PM
Feb 2012

is that Karen Handel and Elizabeth Thompson have resigned.

And I want to know just how much Komen has been paying Handel "for consulting", which will be revealed in the next Komen tax return.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
55. Sorry Susan
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 02:37 PM
Feb 2012

Bust if the last three years of the Obama admin has taught us anything, it is that we do not rush to make nice with people that tried to slit our throats, especially when we know you will try to finish the job the first chance you get. From here on in, it's no quarter given.

UCmeNdc

(9,600 posts)
57. They need to fire some people
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 02:58 PM
Feb 2012

Susan G. Komen Foundation should fire their leadership. How can they continue to support such mismanagement?

underpants

(182,603 posts)
65. I agree - they clearly bowed to their new anti-choice PR person ~AND~ they admit it was political
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 05:56 PM
Feb 2012

"We will amend the criteria to make clear that disqualifying investigations must be criminal and conclusive in nature and not political. "

Robb

(39,665 posts)
66. It was funny, this morning I asked Mrs. Robb if she'd heard about all this
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 06:26 PM
Feb 2012

...she hadn't, but before I even opened my mouth to tell her what had actually taken place, she was railing on about how she'd always known they were crooked, something never felt right about "that woman on TV" etc. etc.

Nice to see you.

underpants

(182,603 posts)
67. I just told Mrs. Underpants about this
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 06:37 PM
Feb 2012

She told me aobut a staunchly conservative friend of our -- oh who is Catholic -- who my wife had to drive to a Planned Parenthood clinic when they were on a business trip because she had forgotten her birthcontrol pills.

Planned Parenthood, as you know, IS THE DOCTOR'S OFFICE for about 3 million women.

csziggy

(34,131 posts)
63. One of the things that bothers me is defunding solely because of an investigation
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 04:31 PM
Feb 2012

Any congress critter can call for an investigation on a whim, so this gives an excuse to de-fund on a whim. Look at what happened to ACORN. The organization was eventually found not at fault, but the damage had already been done - they lost so much funding that a valuable asset for many communities was destroyed.

I think it was Rachel Maddow last night who said that although there had been questions about Planned Parenthood raised in September, they had ALREADY responded to those allegations with proof that they were not using federal funds for anything related to their abortion services. (Or maybe I read it here.) So before the Komen fund cut off their money to PP, PP had already proved their innocence of the charges.

Of course, a right wing congress person who wanted to smear them is not going to state definitively that they are cleared - he would want to keep that question alive just so crap like this will happen. It does not fit into his plan to tear apart any institution that helps people.

If "corporations are people" aren't they entitled to the policy of "innocent until found guilty" just as individuals are?

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
70. Our voices count
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 11:18 PM
Feb 2012

I'm kind of surprised after Bush's obvious deafness to us, but very happy to know we are heard again.

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
72. Sorry. There's a difference between a mistake and a scheme.
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 03:47 AM
Feb 2012

You can't say, "We've learned from our errors."

No, this wasn't an error. And error is where miss a stop sign or forget to floss that morning.

This wasn't an error. This was a scheme SK got caught in, and they were in cahoots with RWers in Congress. SK thought they could cover it by pointing to a Congressional investigation which was started just as an excuse to defund PP.

The good news is, Congress creatures can now also see the width and depth of Planned Parenthood's support. This isn't ACORN. They'll be having some second thoughts about investigating and defunding it. If they're smart.

lark

(23,061 posts)
73. don't believe SGK, they are lying
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 03:26 PM
Feb 2012

They are still paying Ari Fleischer, the president & VP are big time repug donators. I repeat, don't trust them one bit. I thank them for the 3million they raised for Planned Parenthood thru their total incompetency, but the curtain has been removed, we know now who is behind this. I, as a 2x cancer survivor, have thrown all the pink ribbon things people have given me, will not take part or contribute to anything they sponsor. They still don't give a shit about poor women and would rather we die than get help from Planned parenthood. Fuck them. They little seeming retreat is just another rw fraud and while I'm glad the funding will continue this year, would be amazed if PP receives any money next year when SGK thinks the heat is off.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Dallas-based Komen Founda...