Supreme Court rules for Comcast in class-action case
Source: Reuters
Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:24am EDT
(Reuters) - The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled in favor of Comcast Corp in an antitrust case over how much it charged cable TV subscribers.
In a 5-4 decision, the court said a group of cable TV subscribers in the Philadelphia area who accused Comcast of overcharging them as part of an effort to monopolize the market could not sue as a group.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Vicki Allen)
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/27/us-usa-court-comcast-classaction-idUSBRE92Q0MS20130327
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,444 posts)corkhead
(6,119 posts)mountain grammy
(26,613 posts)handed to them buy their "employees," the five corrupt stooges on the supreme court.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)AdHocSolver
(2,561 posts)Few individuals have the financial means to initiate a law suit. Joining a class action lawsuit is often the only way for individuals to fight a large corporation.
The majority of the SCOTUS is again showing its far right wing, pro-corporate ideological activism.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)and own all media!
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)it "was certified improperly, and therefore could not sue as a group."
"The permutations involving four theories of liability and 2 million subscribers located in 16 counties are nearly endless," Jackass Antonin Scalia wrote for the majority.
ProfessionalLeftist
(4,982 posts)WHAT a surprise.
olddots
(10,237 posts)In this case there is money at stake and money to be made and bribed .
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)It seems that no class action lawsuits are permitted then.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)happyslug
(14,779 posts)SCALIA, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and KENNEDY, THOMAS, and ALITO, JJ., joined.
GINSBURG and BREYER, JJ., filed a dissenting opinion, in which SOTOMAYOR and KAGAN, JJ., joined.