Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,465 posts)
Sat May 4, 2013, 09:32 PM May 2013

Harvard Professor apologizes for Keynes comments

Source: AP-Excite

By MAE ANDERSON

NEW YORK (AP) - Niall Ferguson, a Harvard history professor and author, apologized on Saturday for saying economist John Maynard Keynes was less invested in the future because he was gay and had no children.

Ferguson said his remarks at an earlier conference were "as stupid as they were insensitive."

During a question-and-answer session after a prepared speech at the Altegris Strategic Investment conference in Carlsbad, Calif. on Thursday, Ferguson was asked to comment about Keynes, an influential 20thcentury British economist who advocated government spending as a way to make up for lagging demand in a down economy.

Ferguson suggested that Keynes philosophy was shaped by his homosexuality. Keynes, therefore, had no children so he wasn't as invested in future generations as others might be, Ferguson said.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20130504/DA62MD081.html





In this Friday, Sept. 3, 2010 photo, Harvard history professor and author Niall Ferguson attends the "Intelligence on the World, Europe, and Italy" economic forum, at Villa d'Este, in Cernobbio, on Como Lake, Italy. Ferguson is apologizing for saying economist John Maynard Keynes didn't care about the future because he was gay and had no children. Ferguson made the remarks on Thursday, May 2, 2013, during a question-and-answer session after a prepared speech at the Altegris Strategic Investment conference in Carlsbad, Calif. Asked to comment about Keynes, he suggested that the British economist's philosophy was shaped by being homosexual and therefore childless. (AP Photo/Luca Bruno)

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Harvard Professor apologizes for Keynes comments (Original Post) Omaha Steve May 2013 OP
Harvard sure knows how to pick 'em, don't they? (nt) harmonicon May 2013 #1
Elizabeth Warren's a Harvard Prof, too MannyGoldstein May 2013 #6
"smart" is a relative term. paleotn May 2013 #32
"A learned blockhead is a greater blockhead MannyGoldstein May 2013 #35
Ferguson has written economic and world history books alp227 May 2013 #36
Wow brucefan May 2013 #2
At least it was a quick apology. SCVDem May 2013 #3
Seems ironic that a conservative EvolveOrConvolve May 2013 #4
Stupid and insensitive BeyondGeography May 2013 #5
UPDATE 2: While Ferguson may be backing off the aspersions he cast at Keynes as a brief moment of Hissyspit May 2013 #7
That really kind of makes his apology seem less sincere. n/t Ian David May 2013 #8
He's an ass about a lot of things. Hissyspit May 2013 #9
Why is he obsessed with Keynes' sex life? tblue May 2013 #12
Said Harvard prof doth protest too much, methinks. paleotn May 2013 #33
The old conservative pattern . . . markpkessinger May 2013 #10
According to Wikipedia... starroute May 2013 #11
You left this out: "He was brought up as and remains an atheist." Given the emphasis on religion 24601 May 2013 #14
It suggests his interest in religion is of the Leo Strauss variety starroute May 2013 #29
Where's the "Neo" in his views. Is he a fallen liberal or that, as elite universities faculty, 24601 May 2013 #31
Ferguson Is A History Professor DallasNE May 2013 #20
He told McCain that 'the fundamentals of the econom are sound' the day of the crash Bluenorthwest May 2013 #25
He also wants to replace the federal income tax with a 33% sales tax Fortinbras Armstrong May 2013 #21
They're fanatical.... paleotn May 2013 #34
more like "I am sorry I got in trouble for saying what I truly believe" nt msongs May 2013 #13
Hmmmmm . . . Jack Rabbit May 2013 #15
What an assclown. blackspade May 2013 #16
Ferguson is wrong about the economy stevebreeze May 2013 #17
Can't read an excel graph, goes for the gutter. STHU. freshwest May 2013 #18
Why Would A History Professor DallasNE May 2013 #19
a "slip of the tongue" comment like that reveals a person's true beliefs. DCBob May 2013 #22
Had he been drinking? CTyankee May 2013 #23
Such commentary and libels fill his work and always have. He's a simple minded twit of a Bluenorthwest May 2013 #27
He looks -and sounds- like Shaun Hannity. randome May 2013 #24
That's as dumb as Bush saying he didn't care about history or his legacy, because he'll be dead! nt MADem May 2013 #26
He should JustAnotherGen May 2013 #28
In my delusions bucolic_frolic May 2013 #30

paleotn

(17,870 posts)
32. "smart" is a relative term.
Sun May 5, 2013, 01:48 PM
May 2013

...it's interesting how some "smart" people can be just as off their rocker as the general populace, just as sold out to moneyed interests as the average Republican hack or Exxon "scientist". But, since they're considered "smart" by who knows who, their opinions are supposed to hold significantly more weight, no matter if they jive with actual facts or not. Seems to me Mr. Ferguson is just taking up for two of his disgraced colleagues, Haavaad profs and Peterson shills, Rogoff and Reinhart. Ferguson "smart" and opinionated? Maybe. A serious arse? You betcha.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
35. "A learned blockhead is a greater blockhead
Sun May 5, 2013, 02:59 PM
May 2013

A learned blockhead is a greater blockhead than an ignorant one."
- Ben Franklin

I probably should have written "clever" rather than "smart".

Another quote:

"Few men have virtue enough to withstand the highest bidder."
- George Washington

alp227

(31,994 posts)
36. Ferguson has written economic and world history books
Sun May 5, 2013, 10:21 PM
May 2013

Like , The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World, so I find his comments VERY unbecoming of a scholar especially one from am ivy league university. Ferguson was scratching the Limbaugh level barrel right there. By hearing them you would NOT believe he was such a prolific scholar.

 

SCVDem

(5,103 posts)
3. At least it was a quick apology.
Sat May 4, 2013, 09:42 PM
May 2013

It did not include the 'If I offended anybody' line which was good.

What an ignorant thing to say though.

EvolveOrConvolve

(6,452 posts)
4. Seems ironic that a conservative
Sat May 4, 2013, 09:42 PM
May 2013

would accuse Keynes of not giving a shit about future generations.

Fuck you Ferguson, you're a douche.

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
7. UPDATE 2: While Ferguson may be backing off the aspersions he cast at Keynes as a brief moment of
Sat May 4, 2013, 10:18 PM
May 2013

UPDATE 2: While Ferguson may be backing off the aspersions he cast at Keynes as a brief moment of public misspeech, economist Justin Wolfers pointed readers to this excerpt from Ferguson’s The Pity of War, in which takes a gratuitously homophobic swipe at Keynes, insinuating that the economist’s misgivings about World War I were traceable to the lack of anonymous gay sex in London.

“Though his work in the Treasury gratified his sense of self-importance,” Ferguson wrote, “the war itself made Keynes deeply unhappy. Even his sex life went into a decline, perhaps because the boys he liked to pick up in London all joined up.”

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/04/harvard-conservative-tries-to-gay-bash-deceased-economist-keynes

tblue

(16,350 posts)
12. Why is he obsessed with Keynes' sex life?
Sat May 4, 2013, 10:48 PM
May 2013

Want us to talk about your sex life, Mr. Whatayourface? Stop being weird.

paleotn

(17,870 posts)
33. Said Harvard prof doth protest too much, methinks.
Sun May 5, 2013, 01:54 PM
May 2013

...if our experience with virulent American homophobes is any guide.

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
10. The old conservative pattern . . .
Sat May 4, 2013, 10:33 PM
May 2013
  1. Publicly say something utterly outrageous and totally unsupportable that feeds into your audience's worst bigotries and biases;
  2. Wait for the inevitable backlash when you get called out on it;
  3. Issue a disingenuous apology insisting that your words did not reflect how you really feel; and
  4. Lather, rinse, repeat.[/o]

starroute

(12,977 posts)
11. According to Wikipedia...
Sat May 4, 2013, 10:37 PM
May 2013

"Ferguson was an advisor to the John McCain U.S. presidential campaign in 2008, and announced his support for Mitt Romney in 2012 and has been a vocal critic of Barack Obama."

Why am I not surprised?

But there's more: "Matthew Carr wrote in Race & Class that 'Niall Ferguson, the conservative English [sic] historian and enthusiastic advocate of a new American empire, has also embraced the Eurabian idea in a widely reproduced article entitled ‘Eurabia?’, in which he laments the 'de-Christianization of Europe' and its culture of secularism that leaves the continent 'weak in the face of fanaticism'." Carr adds that "Ferguson sees the recent establishment of a department of Islamic studies in his Oxford college as another symptom of 'the creeping Islamicization of a decadent Christendom'" and that in a 2004 lecture at the American Enterprise Institute entitled 'The end of Europe?', "Ferguson struck a similarly Spenglerian note, conjuring the term 'impire' to depict a process in which a ‘political entity, instead of expanding outwards towards its periphery, exporting power, implodes – when the energies come from outside into that entity’. In Ferguson's opinion, this process was already under way in a decadent 'post-Christian' Europe that was drifting inexorably towards the dark denouement of a vanquished civilisation and the fatal embrace of Islam."

He also want to replace the federal income tax with a 33% sales tax, privatize Social Security and Medicare, and cut federal discretionary spending by 20%. Sounds like an all-round delight.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niall_Ferguson

24601

(3,954 posts)
14. You left this out: "He was brought up as and remains an atheist." Given the emphasis on religion
Sat May 4, 2013, 11:33 PM
May 2013

on what you posted, how did you miss that?

starroute

(12,977 posts)
29. It suggests his interest in religion is of the Leo Strauss variety
Sun May 5, 2013, 09:51 AM
May 2013

Like many of the Neocons, he may see religion as a natural way for the elite to organize and control the lower orders -- while remaining above all such superstitious nonsense themselves.

If you start from that kind of elite position, the only real threats to your dominance are other people's elites -- such as the Saudi royal family or some half-baked plan to reestablish the Caliphate. It's all a power game, and actual religion plays no part in the equation.

24601

(3,954 posts)
31. Where's the "Neo" in his views. Is he a fallen liberal or that, as elite universities faculty,
Sun May 5, 2013, 01:37 PM
May 2013

he's just not complying with the prerequisite ideology?

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
20. Ferguson Is A History Professor
Sun May 5, 2013, 04:51 AM
May 2013

Not an Economics Professor so why is anybody even listening to him when he strays far and wide from his training. And what did he advise McCain on, selecting a running mate?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
25. He told McCain that 'the fundamentals of the econom are sound' the day of the crash
Sun May 5, 2013, 09:01 AM
May 2013

Remember that? McCain on stage live somewhere shouting how healthy the economy was, while the crawl at the bottom of the screen showed the markets tanking quickly? That's the wisdom of Ferguson the bigot.

Fortinbras Armstrong

(4,473 posts)
21. He also wants to replace the federal income tax with a 33% sales tax
Sun May 5, 2013, 06:38 AM
May 2013

So as to take the tax burden from the bowed backs of the rich and place it on the poor and middle class.

paleotn

(17,870 posts)
34. They're fanatical....
Sun May 5, 2013, 02:18 PM
May 2013

....so we've got to be just as fanatical to combat THEM. Wonder if Nial worries about radical, islamic, jihadi supermen under his bed at night?

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
15. Hmmmmm . . .
Sat May 4, 2013, 11:46 PM
May 2013

Would Ferguson suggest heterosexuality as a determining factor in his perversely positive view of imperialism?

It would be silly, and as one who regards imperialism as little more than slavery on a national scale, where instead of an individual in bondage having no right to collect wages on his labor, but instead seeing them go to a self-sppointed master, a subjugated nation has no right to exploit its own natural resources but instead sees the control of its wealth pass to another self-appointed tyrant, the mother country.

And exactly where does Professor Ferguson get off saying Lord Keynes had no stake in the future and that he, as a straight man, does? There is ample evidence that Keynesian economic prescriptions work. That is a lot more than can be said for for austerity, a program designed to put the masses in poverty and keep them there. So exactly who is who is more concerned with the future, people like Keynes or people like Ferguson.

Quack, quack, professor.

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
19. Why Would A History Professor
Sun May 5, 2013, 04:39 AM
May 2013

Venture outside his area of expertise so far. That is a recipe for saying something really, really stupid and Ferguson did not disappoint. Keynes economic theory remains the definite work on economics to this day.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
27. Such commentary and libels fill his work and always have. He's a simple minded twit of a
Sun May 5, 2013, 09:09 AM
May 2013

sort they make fewer of each year, an outmoded brand of shiftless idiot that only the UK could create. This con man is out to get press.

JustAnotherGen

(31,769 posts)
28. He should
Sun May 5, 2013, 09:23 AM
May 2013

Also apologize to every woman who is childless by choice or chance regardless of the sexuality she was born with. This is the same hammer that is used in Corporate America when it comes to paid time off.


Well Sally has three kids and is Jewish but needs to be home with them - 5 miles from work on Christmas Eve. But you can't fly 450 miles to be home with your family on Christmas Eve.


I learned real quick to get my tickets and put in my time in August.

Not having children does not mean that:

A. One does NOT have a family

And

B. One does not care about the future of their country.

bucolic_frolic

(42,982 posts)
30. In my delusions
Sun May 5, 2013, 10:11 AM
May 2013

Radical free-market libertarians derive from the fierce imperialists
of the 1600s-1700s, the kind who built fortunes that still exist
today on the backs of the slave trade and sugar cane and rum
trade on plantations in the West Indies. It was natural to them
because back then there were fewer laws regulating anything.

But those ideologies still exist today in ideologues like this idiot.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Harvard Professor apologi...