U.S. spending on medicines fell for first time in 2012
Source: Reuters
Patent expirations on big-name drugs such as Lipitor and Plavix has resulted in modestly less spending on medicines in the United States for the first time in at least 55 years, according to a report released on Thursday.
<snip>
Higher health costs and a weak economy have led many Americans to cut back on visits to the doctor. Admissions to hospitals also remained on the wane and the flu season in early 2012 was relatively mild.
<snip>
IMS also found that visits to emergency rooms increased 5.8 percent last year.
"Some choices that people are making may not be in everyone's best interest," Kleinrock said, noting that some emergency room visits could be by people putting off needed care.
<snip>
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/09/us-drugs-us-spending-idUSBRE94804W20130509
djean111
(14,255 posts)Or maybe not being able to afford "needed care" is not a choice for poor people.
I don't even want to know what "everyone's best interest" might be, if one cannot afford needed health care......
bananas
(27,509 posts)Another quote from the article:
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)When you don't have any money and you aren't making much working at a part -time job, your only choice is to put off medical care and then show up at the ER if you get in trouble.
You can't buy insurance. The system is set up so that even basic blood test costs are hugely inflated for those without insurance, so you can't afford even to save money to get a basic physical. Yes, you can go to a doctor and pay cash, but you can't afford any of the diagnostics.
I'm so offended by that quote. In this country we have gotten to the point at which we blame people for breathing and for not being wealthy, and it's disgusting. Without a full-time job with benefits, none of the working people have any options at all, and low wage part-time employment is what our economy is mainly generating.
We have massively high real unemployment levels, because the population is rising far more quickly than jobs are expanding:
Core employment men:
Core employment women:
Labor force (doesn't count those not looking due to discouragement):
closeupready
(29,503 posts)In ages past, journalists used to do their jobs.
Now, they get their marching orders from on high, and obey, or get fired.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)marble falls
(57,075 posts)bananas
(27,509 posts)Not sure, but it looks like you can download the full report free if you register (also free?).
The website is http://www.theimsinstitute.org
On the far right column of the website you'll see:
Declining Medicine Use and Costs: For Better or Worse?
(There's a different report on the left column)
The report can also be downloaded as an app via iTunes.
Here's the press release:
IMS Health Study Points to a Declining Cost Curve for U.S. Medicines in 2012
Contact:
Bob Linton
+ 1.610.244.2600
blinton@us.imshealth.com
Total Real Per Capita Spending on Medicines Fell 3.5 Percent;
Fewer Doctor Office Visits and Non-Emergency Hospital Admissions;
Prescription Use Down 0.1 Percent
PARSIPPANY, NJ, May 9, 2013 Total spending on U.S. medicines fell 3.5 percent on a real per capita basis in 2012 and the use of healthcare services overall declined for the second consecutive year, according to a new study released today by the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics.
The report Declining Medicine Use and Costs: For Better or Worse? finds that total dollars spent on medications in the U.S. reached $325.8 billion last year, or real per capita spending of $898, down $33 from 2011. Underlying drivers for the overall decline in healthcare service use included fewer patient visits to office-based physicians, fewer non-emergency admissions to hospitals and outpatient facilities, and a less severe flu season in the early part of 2012. Patent expiries in 2012 contributed $28.9 billion to the reduction in medicine spending. This was their largest-ever impact as millions of patients accessed lower-cost generic versions of additional medicines.
Patients with insurance paid higher deductibles, copays and co-insurance for their overall healthcare, but prescription drug copays for most patients declined. At the same time, new transformative medicines became available to treat a large number of diseases with small or strictly defined patient populations.
The cost curve for medicines was clearly bent in 2012, for better or for worse, said Murray Aitken, executive director, IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. To some extent, this is a harbinger of more efficient use of our healthcare resources, but it also reflects a decline in utilization that may be the result of under-treatment and an imbalance between prevention and care. On the eve of the most transformative period in U.S. healthcare, understanding the drivers of this cost-curve reduction is critical to effectively addressing the long-term implications.
The reports key findings include the following:
- Changes in the utilization of healthcare services and medicines. The number of patient visits to doctors offices fell 0.9 percent in 2012, a lower level of decline compared with the prior two years. Outpatient treatment and non-emergency room admissions also were down slightly. Only emergency room admissions increased, by 5.8 percent, in 2012. Use of medicines per person declined slightly by 0.1 percent, partly due to a milder cough, cold and flu season in the initial months of 2012.
- Healthcare costs and spending on medicines. The total cost of medicines declined by 3.5 percent on a real per capita basis to $325.8 billion. In addition to lower utilization of branded drugs, the primary drivers were: the increased availability of lower-cost generics, which now account for 84 percent of all prescriptions; the moderating impact of price increases; and lower spending on recently launched medicines. Healthcare costs remain heavily concentrated among relatively few patients suffering from multiple chronic conditions, cancer or other specialty diseases. In the case of the commercially insured, under age 65 population, 5 percent of the members incurred 51 percent of total healthcare costs by using more than $15,684 of healthcare services per person in 2012.
- Patient payment for healthcare and medicines. Patients with insurance are paying higher deductibles and higher copays or co-insurance, with nearly 20 percent of the insured now in a consumer-driven health plan. Average out-of-pocket costs for commercially insured under age 65 patients reached $1,146 in 2012, a 30 percent jump from 2011 and entirely the result of higher deductibles. The average pharmacy benefit copay declined by $2 to $121 in 2012; patients filled 72 percent of all retail prescriptions with a copay of $10 or less.
- Transformations in disease treatment. Patients gained access to 28 new molecular entities in 2012, including seven with orphan drug designations by the FDA for rare diseases, a novel oral therapy for rheumatoid arthritis, a treatment for cystic fibrosis that will significantly improve life expectancy for patients with a specific genetic mutation, and an inhalable anti-psychotic. Nine new cancer treatments were introduced last year, the most in more than a decade, including a breakthrough for treating basal-cell carcinoma.
The full report is available at http://www.theimsinstitute.org . The report can also be downloaded as an app via iTunes. The study was produced independently as a public service, without industry or government funding.
Analyses conducted for the report are based on IMS information resources and focus on prescription-bound products, including Insulins that are available without a prescription. OTC products are excluded from the report. Spending figures are derived from IMS National Sales Perspectives and reported at wholesaler invoice prices that do not reflect off-invoice discounts and rebates. Prescription data are derived from IMS National Prescription Audit, which tracks national prescription trends and activity for all pharmaceutical products. Other IMS information resources used in this report include NPA Market Dynamics, IMS National Disease and Therapeutic Index, Vector One®: National, Vector One®: Payer, PharMetrics Plus, FAN® and IMS MIDAS. More detail on information sources is included in the report.
About the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics
The IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics provides key policy setters and decision makers in the global health sector with unique and transformational insights into healthcare dynamics derived from granular analysis of information. It is a research-driven entity with a worldwide reach that collaborates with external healthcare experts from across academia and the public and private sectors to objectively apply IMSs proprietary global information and analytical assets. More information about the IMS Institute can be found at: http://www.theimsinstitute.org.
About IMS Health
IMS Health is a leading worldwide provider of information, technology, and services dedicated to making healthcare perform better. With a global technology infrastructure and unique combination of real-world evidence, advanced analytics and proprietary software platforms, IMS Health connects knowledge across all aspects of healthcare to help clients improve patient outcomes and operate more efficiently. The companys expert resources draw on data from nearly 100,000 suppliers, and on insights from 39 billion healthcare transactions processed annually, to serve more than 5,000 healthcare clients globally. Customers include pharmaceutical, medical device and consumer health manufacturers and distributors, providers, payers, government agencies, policymakers, researchers and the financial community. Additional information is available at www.imshealth.com.