Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,019 posts)
Thu May 9, 2013, 04:16 PM May 2013

F.B.I. Did Not Tell Police in Boston of Russian Tip

Last edited Fri May 10, 2013, 01:54 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: NY Times

The F.B.I. did not tell the Boston police about the 2011 warning from Russia about Tamerlan Tsarnaev, one of the two brothers accused in the Boston Marathon bombings, the city’s police chief said Thursday during the first public Congressional hearing on the terrorist attack.

Boston’s police commissioner, Edward Davis, said that though some of his officers worked with the F.B.I. on a Joint Terrorism Task Force, they did not know about the Russian tip or the bureau’s subsequent inquiry, which involved an interview with Mr. Tsarnaev and his parents.

Had his department learned about the tip, in which Russian officials said that Mr. Tsarnaev had embraced radical Islam and intended to travel to Russia to connect with underground groups, “we would certainly look at the individual,” Commissioner Davis told the House Homeland Security Committee. He noted that F.B.I. officers found no evidence of a crime and closed the case. He said that he could not say whether he would have reached a different conclusion, but that his officers would “absolutely” have taken a second look at Mr. Tsarnaev.

Commissioner Davis said he recognized the sensitivity of intelligence received from other countries. “But when information is out there that affects the safety of my community, I need to know that,” he said.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/10/us/boston-police-werent-told-fbi-got-warning-on-tsarnaev.html



Boston Globe: "Boston Police not warned of bomb suspect, chief says"
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
F.B.I. Did Not Tell Police in Boston of Russian Tip (Original Post) alp227 May 2013 OP
Impeach Obama!!! Roland99 May 2013 #1
why? they didn't impeach Bush and he knew more about 911 before hand than you and I know now. olddad56 May 2013 #6
I know Roland99 May 2013 #8
It wasn't a job for local PD. Never has been. MjolnirTime May 2013 #2
Untrue. former9thward May 2013 #5
Why would they? KamaAina May 2013 #3
Wow, 3 weeks later, and there's already an investigation? brett_jv May 2013 #4
It's simply not possible to track every lead. cheapdate May 2013 #7
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
3. Why would they?
Thu May 9, 2013, 04:26 PM
May 2013

Black Hat lived in Cambridge.

But I'll bet they didn't tell the Cambridge PD, either.

brett_jv

(1,245 posts)
4. Wow, 3 weeks later, and there's already an investigation?
Thu May 9, 2013, 04:35 PM
May 2013

You mean, the President isn't going to stonewall for over a year, and then have to be shamed by the survivors into finally allowing one ... and then when it happens, he's not going to insist on deciding what the 'valid avenues of investigation' are? And he's not going to insist that his family bagmen are in charge of the investigation?

I bet if Congress were to ask him to testify, he wouldn't insist it be done in secret, with Biden there to hold his hand, either.

What a refreshing change it is to have a real President, instead of a Pretzeldunce.

This sort of 'lack of sharing' is what happens when you decide to categorize the whole idea of 'terrorism' as some sort of entirely separate issue from regular crime. When you 'militarize' and 'federalize' a particular type of crime, you invite this sort of thing, frankly. These federal agencies have their little fiefdoms, and they want to protect their budgets through having a 'unique role' in the scheme of things, and hence they protect 'their own' intelligence.

It's also possible that somehow it wouldn't have been 'legal' for the FBI to tell the police chief what they'd learned, probably via some sort of technicality involving intel that originates from overseas ...

Either way, it's nice of the 'drive by media' to publish this little hit-piece without even bothering to determine WHY (or if they did, they aren't telling) the information wasn't shared. Nice job guys.

One thing we can be 100% sure of ... the wingnutosphere will soon explode will outrage over this revelation ... be shocked if it's not already the headline on teh Drudge Report ...

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
7. It's simply not possible to track every lead.
Thu May 9, 2013, 06:16 PM
May 2013

One-hundred percent surveillance isn't possible. Hindsight is 20-20, but you do the best you can in the present,

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»F.B.I. Did Not Tell Polic...