Angelina Jolie says she had double mastectomy
Source: AP-Excite
LOS ANGELES (AP) - Angelina Jolie says that she has had a preventive double mastectomy after learning she carried a gene that made it extremely likely she would get breast cancer.
The Oscar-winning actress and partner to Brad Pitt made the announcement in the form of an op-ed she authored for Tuesday's New York Times ( ) under the headline, "My Medical Choice." She writes that between early February and late April she completed three months of surgical procedures to remove both breasts.http://nyti.ms/17o4A0f
Jolie, 37, writes that she made the choice with thoughts of her six children after watching her own mother, actress Marcheline Bertrand, die too young from cancer.
"My mother fought cancer for almost a decade and died at 56," Jolie writes. "She held out long enough to meet the first of her grandchildren and to hold them in her arms. But my other children will never have the chance to know her and experience how loving and gracious she was."
FULL story at link.
Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20130514/DA690BH02.html
Actress Angelina Jolie arrives for the British Gala premiere for the film 'Salt', at a central London cinema, in this Aug. 16, 2010 file photo. Jolie authored an op-ed for Tuesdays May 14, 2013 New York Times where she writes that in April she finished three months of surgical procedures to remove both breasts as a preventive measure. She says shes kept the process private but is writing about it now with hopes she can help other women. (AP Photo/Joel Ryan, File)
shawn703
(2,702 posts)I'm sure this procedure as a preventative measure is pretty rare, since I would be surprised if insurance would pay for it unless there was cancer present - but is this something a doctor would recommend to a patient simply based on genetics?
lunatica
(53,410 posts)They pinpointed the bad gene. I think that will end up being a huge help to a lot of women who have relatives with breast cancer. This is actually really good news and I'm glad she's talking about it.
Deep13
(39,154 posts)20 years ago she'd be screwed. I'm glad viable options exist now.
Greybnk48
(10,167 posts)As a former surgical tech and someone that knows a family of women who have had this done, it is recommended when necessary. And I think insurance covers it, but someone else may know the true answer to that part of it.
Dash87
(3,220 posts)Otherwise, they will more than likely get cancer.
zazen
(2,978 posts)Extreme breast density combined w/ certain types of precursor lesions are about as high risk as the gene (estimates of 60-70% by one Mayo clinic study), and certainly as high risk as family history, and if you want a double mastectomy with reconstruction in those circumstances it's typically covered, even though, eg, no one's found anything amiss in your contralateral breast.
Some people (docs and patients) are arguing that this is overtreatment and hysteria, but as long as women are informed as to the latest research, I'm glad we can freely make whatever decision feels most right for us.
Now that one can get pretty amazing cosmetic outcomes, the whole terror-that-I'm-losing-my-femininity stuff has largely abated.
byeya
(2,842 posts)are one of these groups. If the gene[s] is not present, the risk is no greater than the general population Fortunately, a fairly inexpensive test is now available to determine if you are at risk.
I think it's a positive thing for people in the public eye to make known these seldom-discussed but vitally important matters.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)There's one gene out there, for example, which makes it very likely that you will develop kidney cancer. There's at least one which makes it almost certain that you will develop colon cancer.
The gene complex she had makes it extremely likely that she would develop breast cancer and greatly increases the risk of ovarian cancer. A lot of insurances will pay for such surgery for younger women, especially since some states require coverage:
http://ww5.komen.org/BreastCancer/PreventiveSurgery.html
http://breastreconstructionnetwork.com/will-my-insurance-company-pay-for-a-mastectomy-to-reduce-my-risk-of-breast-cancer/
There is a federal law which requires that if insurance covers the mastectomy, it must also cover reconstructive surgery.
It is much cheaper to do preventative mastectomies than to treat disseminated cancer, so generally most insurance cos in the US do cover this for higher risk individuals.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)type of breast cancer. She was bummed about the whole situation and ended up not being able to get prosthesis after also. But dramatically decreased her chance of getting the cancer.
geek_sabre
(731 posts)No one talked about anything but her leg. That would have been after the mastectomies, but before the implants.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)The mastectomy was done over the past two months.
geek_sabre
(731 posts)Feb 2: nipple delay
Two weeks later (Feb 16-Feb 22): Breast tissue removed, fillers added
9 weeks later (April 5th-12) reconstruction + implants.
2012 oscars: Feb 26
So... perhaps the dress/leg thing was purely a coincidence. Maybe she's always been wacky at the shows (I've never noticed). But it falls in the timeline I proposed.
Bucky
(53,998 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)Very experienced in the art of deception.
Very brave, too.
Melinda
(5,465 posts)are what's wacky - not Jolie. Your posts on this matter are incredibly insensitive and disrespectful, and seriously make DU suck today.
psychopomp
(4,668 posts)...and it's been this way for years.
geek_sabre
(731 posts)I think she made the best possible decision for herself and her family in having the mastectomy. It was incredibly brave of her to make an intensely private decision public. I can only hope that some other women who find themselves in similar genetic circumstances will see her account, and be open to this option.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Sure, I get it. You were just claiming you admire her right?
geek_sabre
(731 posts)There were memes.
Locut0s
(6,154 posts)Don't know why she 'made a fool' of herself. It was a bit showy sure but then she is a huge celebrity.
denem
(11,045 posts)I demand the Admins to delete this. Not news. Stupid. Stupid know-nothings. Fame is not LBN.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)I think it's very hopeful for women who have a family history of breast cancer. Many women opt for this surgery but they don't go public with it which is very important. Someone as famous as Jolie is doing a great service!
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)I think this is an important story to publicize. Maybe it doesn't belong in LBN, but could it be moved to GD?
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Women with this gene are faced with really tough choices. A dear friend of mine died just over a year ago at 31, she had this gene, her mom died in her 50s from breast cancer, and she might have had a long and heathy life had she known earlier that this option was available.
Bucky
(53,998 posts)denem
(11,045 posts)about the No. 1 YouTube guy being banned at home on Korean TV.
"I demand" was tongue in cheek.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)And frankly, I think it is very good to have celebrities, especially one known for her appearance come out and say that she had this procedure done. It's a very traumatic thing for a woman and many women put their own lives in jeopardy because they fear the stigma, the trauma to their self image so much.
Having the media attention on this is a good thing.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)breakfast, where she went on vacation, now that isn't LBN worthy.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)i see the admins havent rushed to attend to your demands
JustinBulletin
(73 posts)I once worked with a woman who had lost both of her sisters, mother, aunts and grandmother to breast cancer. When she was in her early forties she decided to do the same thing. This was years ago around 1980. She had already had years of biopsy test on cysts in her breast that had always been benign. She was tired of "waiting for the other shoe to drop" so she had a double mastectomy and implants put in later after she healed when her doctor thought it was safe. He did the surgery because he believed she would eventually develop breast cancer and wanted to give her peace of mind. I saw her years later and I don't think she ever regretted doing it. It was an easy decision in her case, and I think she probably had a better quality of life not having to worry all the time and go through the invasive biopsy tests every few months.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)Her Father and Husband are both surgeons. He Dad performed the surgery. She did it for her kids.
midnight
(26,624 posts)abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)midnight
(26,624 posts)insurance industry has created all these out of pocket expenses... She could be a great force for examining the difference between millions health care and those who are not....
peace13
(11,076 posts)...Mom wouldn't it be nice if every woman in the US could have a lumpectomy and radiation if she needed it? But mom doesn't get it. You see, medical care is a privilege and she has a right. Women who make bad choices end up with no medical care...go figure!
midnight
(26,624 posts)rationed health care.. But I see the use of dollars being put into providing health care as a win win for everyone... Jobs, economy, better health.... We need to get passed this austerity nonsense that seems to sell like hot cakes from the top down.
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)midnight
(26,624 posts)Occulus
(20,599 posts)And yes, I am saying exactly what you think I'm saying.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)Insurance does cover the surgeries. I have a strong family history of breast/ovarian cancer. I was tested for the gene in 2004 and came up positive for Brca2. The genetic counselors and doctors all said I needed to have the surgeries. The surgeries and recovery were extremely painful. I did not have cancer. The insurance had to cover both the surgery and reconstruction.
appacom
(296 posts)Faygo Kid
(21,478 posts)Her father is a total right-wing asshole, but I give it up to her for this decision.
mainer
(12,022 posts)When it's preventive, it can be done without extensive resection, and implants can be inserted to minimize disfigurement.
Flora
(126 posts)I'm old enough to remember the outrage when Nancy Reagan had her breast removed after the discover of a cancerous tumor. Many in the medical field claimed her decision would scare other women into avoiding detection procedures and Rose Kushner, the executive director of the Breast Cancer Advisory Center in Kensington, Md., went so far as to say that Mrs. Reagan's decision ''set us back 10 years.''
I'm happy that we have evolved over the last 20 or so years and recognize a women's right to made decisions concerning her own health and body.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Bay Boy
(1,689 posts)...is a VERY hard thing to do. But with an 87% chance of getting cancer I suppose that makes that decision easier to make.
but still...
neversaydie
(69 posts)but I'd do the same if the risk was high. I'd also do the same as an alternative to a lumpectomy. My mom, her sister and mother, my sister, my great aunt, a close friend, all had breast cancer. My mom, thank god, survived and is still with us. She had a mastectomy in 1989 and she's still here. But her sister and my close friend both chose lumpectomy as opposed to mastectomy. Both ended up having to go back in to find that the cancer spread. Both ended up dying from the cancer that had spread to their lungs, liver and brain.
Angelina has children and so do I. I want to be here for my children, so, yeah... mastectomy would be my choice.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)I wish her many healthy years to come.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)Fuck cancer.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Unlike mastectomies necessitated by the presence of cancer, a woman undergoing a preventative mastectomy can look forward to a much better cosmetic result, including keeping her nipples, and less scarring. Once there is ductal carcinoma present, the nipples have to go, and the fake nipples they make out of your own tissues just do not look the same. Also, depending on the location of the tumor(s), the surgeon tends to leave long scars that start at the armpit and span the chest, because at that point they need to get a clean margin to save your life. And if you need to have radiation treatment, those scars will harden, as will the surrounding tissue. Hence, post-cancer reconstructive efforts often have disappointing results.
As Angelina points out, she saved her nipples, after first making sure there was no cancer in her ducts. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/14/opinion/my-medical-choice.html?hp I am sure she had the best plastic surgeons and her breasts look beautiful. Except now they won't kill her. To me, her decision was a no-brainer and did not involve any particular courage, just rational thought. You want to see courage? Go to a cancer ward.
David__77
(23,372 posts)Even though the risk is high, and the cosmetic result may have been relatively good, it is not a risk-free procedure, and surely not straight-forward from a psychological standpoint - not immediately in any case.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I applaud her openness about this in trying to help other women and to bring about awareness.
Deep13
(39,154 posts)Made the courageous choice.
A friend of mine did that for the same reason. The docs replaced the breast material from the inside, but left the external bits.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)Very disturbing that prophylactic bilateral mastectomy is being normalized -- even promoted as a viable option. Clearly there has been much effort and many many dollars invested in finding this inherited gene mutation that affects a very small percentage of women (and men) and puts them at risk for cancer(s). WHY HAVEN'T WE INVESTED THE SAME EFFORT AND DOLLARS IN RESEARCH TO PREVENT THIS DISEASE THAT KILLS 300,000 WOMEN EVERY YEAR? Let's stop normalizing mutilation and extremely toxic treatments and focus on preventing the disease from the start.
Response to GoneOffShore (Reply #49)
Dash87 This message was self-deleted by its author.
GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)She is studying the link between HPV and various forms of cancer.
Dash87
(3,220 posts)I took her statement to mean that mastectomies are somehow unnecessary, or that women should not get them.
I'll eat my crow and delete the post. I was intemperate because of the idiotic statements I've been hearing for the last 2 years.
I'm sorry.
GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)And it's easy when an issue this important comes along to get upset by something that is possibly vaguely worded.
But, if you want light entertainment, just to relieve the tension as it were, check out the Kitchen Nightmares meltdown with Amy's Baking Company in Scottsdale - An intertubes sensation!
neversaydie
(69 posts)but I get it, really. women shouldn't have to make such a drastic choice, and they wouldn't have to if more research and preventive treatments
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...for a woman's right to make decisions concerning her body and her health.
- No matter what part of her body it is......
spiderpig
(10,419 posts)Among women! My mother would say (name) had a mastectomy and couldn't wear sleeveless dresses anymore, because the surgeons removed all the arm muscles to make sure they "got it all".
I grew up feeling it was the most horrible thing ever to go through. Flame away, but that was the thinking of the time. 1960s.
While my sister and I don't have the gene, we know many people who do. So back off on AJ. There are a lot of other people to spew your venom at.
christx30
(6,241 posts)Reduce your risk of cancer. Stay alive and be with your kids. If my wife was found with that gene, I'd be behind her 100% in getting it done, if she wanted it done.
To hell with cancer.
Bombero1956
(3,539 posts)Right after finishing her 6 rounds of chemo for a stage 2 ovarian cancer diagnosis. She had the genetic testing done just before getting the cancer news. We discussed it and decided that the best course of action was breast removal and reconstructive surgery. She recently had a follow up CT scan and blood work and it appears she's still cancer free for which I'm grateful. This is the doctor who did my wife's surgery.
http://www.masslive.com/living/index.ssf/2013/05/area_surgeon_steven_schonholz_specializes_in_identifying_women_with_brca_mutation_for_breast_cancer.html
AnnieBW
(10,424 posts)I have a lot of respect for this kind of courage. Face it, she makes a very good living on how she looks, and her breasts are a big part of that. If I was in the same position, I don't think that I could do that. Hell, I think for a living and I don't think that I could do it.
My mom is a breast cancer survivor, but it wasn't the least of her health problems. She caught it early with a mammogram and had a lumpectomy. Hers came from taking Provera, not genetics.
neversaydie
(69 posts)and don't take this the wrong way, but I've always found my "girls" to be a bit of a pain... most of the time. Hard to find the right bra size, bras don't last that long, they're expensive. I can't go bra-less because it's uncomfortable; not because I give a damn what anyone thinks, but it's just more comfortable to have those puppies restrained.
Other that their most beautiful and amazing function which allowed me to nurse both of my children, which is an incredible experience that I'm fortunate to have had, they can be bothersome.
is it just me?