Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed May 15, 2013, 05:45 PM May 2013

Feinstein Won’t Condemn Seizure of AP Phone Records

Source: Roll Call


By Meredith Shiner
Posted at 2:35 p.m. today

Senate Intelligence Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., is not yet alarmed by recent news that the Department of Justice acquired the phone records of Associated Press reporters.

As we reported in this space yesterday, Feinstein was one of many lawmakers in both parties who last summer called on the Obama administration to more aggressively pursue leakers who divulged classified national security information to The New York Times. Republicans especially who were most vocal in pushing for tougher investigations last summer have done a 180 and are now siding with the aggrieved journalists in their complaint against the government.

“I’m not one of them that has said the Department of Justice has exceeded their boundaries. I think it’s important that we find out exactly what was done. As I understand it, it was a very short period of time and the only thing collected was what we call metadata — which is not content of a call, it’s numbers,” Feinstein told CQ Roll Call in a brief interview Wednesday. “I would assume because prosecutions are so difficult to make in this era that being able to trace where the leak came from to the person that receives the leak is important.”

But Feinstein also expressed reservations about those members who seem to have suddenly changed their position on the issue less than a year later out of what appears on the surface to be political expediency.

“I think to some extent what we’re into is an unusual effort to really find fault, and I very much regret it. But it’s going to impact the credibility of the people who are doing this, long term, I think,” Feinstein said.

=snip=



Read more: http://blogs.rollcall.com/wgdb/feinstein-declines-to-condemn-doj-in-ap-leaks-probe/

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Feinstein Won’t Condemn Seizure of AP Phone Records (Original Post) DonViejo May 2013 OP
Fuuuuuck her. bobclark86 May 2013 #1
Post removed Post removed May 2013 #2
Gee, thanks... bobclark86 May 2013 #3
And "fuck her" does? nt awoke_in_2003 May 2013 #5
We need to know the sources Blandocyte May 2013 #4
No, we don't need to know... bobclark86 May 2013 #6
If we need a federal shield law, make it applicable to everyone. AnotherMcIntosh May 2013 #8
^^^This. Yes. Blandocyte May 2013 #15
Of course she doesn't (& shouldn't) condemn it. pacalo May 2013 #7
Will somebody please remind us: In what way exactly is she a liberal? AnotherMcIntosh May 2013 #9
She isn't for the most part Harmony Blue May 2013 #10
There are no limits to how low this so-called DEM Party will stoop to placate the Teabaggers. blkmusclmachine May 2013 #11
Surprised? I am not. Safetykitten May 2013 #12
"it’s going to impact the credibility of the people who are doing this, long term, I think" winter is coming May 2013 #13
Nothing new. Feinstein has ALWAYS been an authoritarian hawk. Xithras May 2013 #14
Grand Jury cynzke May 2013 #16
Feinstein was among those who called for an investigation, and that's what she got. nt Tarheel_Dem May 2013 #17

Response to bobclark86 (Reply #1)

bobclark86

(1,415 posts)
3. Gee, thanks...
Wed May 15, 2013, 07:06 PM
May 2013

That adds to the discussion... And here I thought our party was pro-media doing its job, not pro-Gestapo tactics. We need a federal shield law.

Blandocyte

(1,231 posts)
4. We need to know the sources
Wed May 15, 2013, 07:10 PM
May 2013

If I have to live with all the TSA bullshit at an airport, surely AP can live with their ME sources being probed via looking up some phone numbers. Sheesh.

bobclark86

(1,415 posts)
6. No, we don't need to know...
Wed May 15, 2013, 08:29 PM
May 2013

You know why? Because people who blow the whistle will be punished for shining light on the cockroaches. If there's no way to protect them, they won't come out, and all the bad shit, like the Pentagon Papers, Watergate, etc., would never come to light.

THAT is the exact opposite of the "This is the most transparent administration in history" line the president is using all the time.

We need a federal shield law. Now more than ever.

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
7. Of course she doesn't (& shouldn't) condemn it.
Wed May 15, 2013, 08:34 PM
May 2013

That leak caused an agent who had infiltrated a terrorist cell to be pulled from that key assignment. It was his inside information that had prevented that terrorist group from carrying out their planned attack on U.S. citizens.

It's the Plame leak all over again.

 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
11. There are no limits to how low this so-called DEM Party will stoop to placate the Teabaggers.
Thu May 16, 2013, 01:02 AM
May 2013

All under the ruse of phony "bi-partisanship."

Sick of it.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
13. "it’s going to impact the credibility of the people who are doing this, long term, I think"
Thu May 16, 2013, 08:47 AM
May 2013

I wonder if she knows who the leaker is.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
14. Nothing new. Feinstein has ALWAYS been an authoritarian hawk.
Thu May 16, 2013, 10:31 AM
May 2013

She's only "left" on a few issues. Politically she's a pro-business centrist who never saw a war she didn't love. Her long hold on her seat owes less to her popularity than it does to the internal political will of the state Dem party here in California (the state party keeps primary challengers at bay by threatening future funding).

I suspect that she'll retire before the next election in 2018, as the new Top 2 system will be in place and she'll actually have to fight another Democrat for the seat.

cynzke

(1,254 posts)
16. Grand Jury
Thu May 16, 2013, 12:39 PM
May 2013

Some DUers have suggested the subpoenas were issued by the Grand Jury. This is a criminal investigation in the hands of a grand jury, not a JD witch hunt.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Feinstein Won’t Condemn S...