Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,018 posts)
Wed May 22, 2013, 07:30 PM May 2013

Judge apologizes for lack of transparency in James Rosen leak probe

Source: Washington Post

The chief judge of the District’s federal court issued an unusual order Wednesday, apologizing to the public and the media for not making certain court documents widely available online.

The gesture of transparency by U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth comes at a time when the Obama administration is under scrutiny for an unprecedented number of leak investigations, including one showing that the Justice Department had secretly probed the news-gathering activities of Fox News reporter James Rosen.

The investigation of Rosen was first reported Monday, after The Washington Post obtained court documents containing details of the case.

A federal judge had ordered the documents unsealed in November 2011, but they were kept sealed for 18 months and not posted on the court’s online docket until last week, after The Post inquired about them.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/judge-apologizes-for-lack-of-transparency-in-leak-case/2013/05/22/ad769370-c308-11e2-8c3b-0b5e9247e8ca_story.html



Past coverage by the Post:
Fox calls DOJ investigation of reporter "downright chilling" (5/21)
A rare peek into a Justice Department leak probe (5/20)
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge apologizes for lack of transparency in James Rosen leak probe (Original Post) alp227 May 2013 OP
Note the investigation still stands. Rosen is still being investigated for wrongdoing. Dawson Leery May 2013 #1
Where is the evidence of this? brett_jv May 2013 #3
Lambert was first appointed by Ronald Reagan Roselma May 2013 #2

brett_jv

(1,245 posts)
3. Where is the evidence of this?
Thu May 23, 2013, 01:24 AM
May 2013

Not saying you're wrong but I've been following the story reasonably closely, and all I've ever seen to that effect is that, around 2 years ago, an FBI agent wrote in a warrant application that he was justified in asking for the warrant due to illegal activity (under the Espionage Act) by Rosen. And that the warrant was granted at that time.

But like I say that happened like 2 years ago now iirc ... so I'm curious as to where you've seen that he is 'still being investigated for wrongdoing'?

Roselma

(540 posts)
2. Lambert was first appointed by Ronald Reagan
Wed May 22, 2013, 09:17 PM
May 2013

and was later appointed to the FISA court. In 2008, he assumed his current position. At least Republicans can't claim that he was liberal or appointed by a Democrat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royce_Lamberth

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge apologizes for lack...