Judge apologizes for lack of transparency in James Rosen leak probe
Source: Washington Post
The chief judge of the Districts federal court issued an unusual order Wednesday, apologizing to the public and the media for not making certain court documents widely available online.
The gesture of transparency by U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth comes at a time when the Obama administration is under scrutiny for an unprecedented number of leak investigations, including one showing that the Justice Department had secretly probed the news-gathering activities of Fox News reporter James Rosen.
The investigation of Rosen was first reported Monday, after The Washington Post obtained court documents containing details of the case.
A federal judge had ordered the documents unsealed in November 2011, but they were kept sealed for 18 months and not posted on the courts online docket until last week, after The Post inquired about them.
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/judge-apologizes-for-lack-of-transparency-in-leak-case/2013/05/22/ad769370-c308-11e2-8c3b-0b5e9247e8ca_story.html
Past coverage by the Post:
Fox calls DOJ investigation of reporter "downright chilling" (5/21)
A rare peek into a Justice Department leak probe (5/20)
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)brett_jv
(1,245 posts)Not saying you're wrong but I've been following the story reasonably closely, and all I've ever seen to that effect is that, around 2 years ago, an FBI agent wrote in a warrant application that he was justified in asking for the warrant due to illegal activity (under the Espionage Act) by Rosen. And that the warrant was granted at that time.
But like I say that happened like 2 years ago now iirc ... so I'm curious as to where you've seen that he is 'still being investigated for wrongdoing'?
Roselma
(540 posts)and was later appointed to the FISA court. In 2008, he assumed his current position. At least Republicans can't claim that he was liberal or appointed by a Democrat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royce_Lamberth