Humanist Groups Raise Tens of Thousands for Atheist Tornado Survivor
Source: Raw Story
Humanist groups raise tens of thousands for atheist tornado survivor
By David Ferguson
Friday, May 24, 2013 15:14 EDT
Humanist groups and atheists across the U.S. have banded together to help a fellow atheist who survived the massive tornado that struck Moore, Oklahoma earlier this week.
- snip -
At the fund-raising website Indiegogo, atheists have set up a relief fund for Vitsun, who lost her house in the storm and most of her possessions.
Lets show the world that you dont need to believe in a god to have human compassion nor does all charity fall under the banner of religion, says the site. Lets get this courageous woman and her family back in their own home.
The site has already passed its goal of $50,000 by nearly $700 at press time, with 60 days in the fund-raiser still to go.
Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/24/humanist-groups-raise-tens-of-thousands-for-atheist-tornado-survivor
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)deny her aid because she said publicly that she was an atheist.
magellan
(13,257 posts)...I'm not feeling good about the way it's advertised as just for her. And I'm an atheist. It reminds me of how I feel when Christian organizations only help Christians. Isn't it a little in-your-face divisive?
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)defacto7
(13,485 posts)But another good point is that it's a statement of solidarity and support for and by atheists. I'm sure there are atheist groups supporting the general need too. They usually do.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)I think it's wonderful.
It reminds me of the benefits the community used to do when someone was ill or fell on hard times. It's no different.
magellan
(13,257 posts)I am. But it's a given with most people that religious groups will lend a hand; not so for atheists. Too many believe we aren't good at giving, because we go unnoticed. We aren't a collective like the religious are. We don't draw attention to our acts of charity by flying a banner.
I'm honestly torn about it, but I lean towards thinking it might have been better to collect for all, rather than choosing one of our own as the recipient.
wryter2000
(46,023 posts)I think their point would have been much better made if they were organizing to help everyone.
SkyDaddy7
(6,045 posts)Most Atheist donate to groups that help everyone but this girl was singled out to no fault of her own & stood strong...Most would have went with the flow on national TV but she stood strong & that is why. IMHO.
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)It doesn't need to be so specific. As an atheist, I would prefer to see all donations - regardless of who raises the money - go to all who are in need - regardless of their personal belief or lack thereof.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)Why should it be up to you to decide the proper way to make and direct a donation? Now *that's* divisive.
This isn't a formal group. It's individuals who are donating through indigogo.
And those same individuals may make make contributions and donations elsewhere. I'm guessing that this isn't the first time the donators have made a donation to an organization or person.
magellan
(13,257 posts)I expressed genuine misgivings about the message it sends, that's all.
fwm
(12 posts)I have a graphic design group I belong to that is giving to a family where the father is a graphic designer. I've given to the Red Cross before but I like the idea of knowing exactly who my money is going to help. It's more of a personal connection.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)The Internet is one of the most profound inventions if you think about it.
Theoretically every person on the planet can get connected to everyone else. Internet memes and hive-mind activities like the one in the OP fascinate me.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)I am in awe of what we do when we put our hearts and heads together... anything that helps us, is gonna leave a mark
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... are only paying about half of what properties were worth before the tornado, less than what they have in the past. I read this thread before replying and don't agree that it's devisive for atheist's to be helping one person. Like this is the only way atheist's are supporting the tornado victims? That assumption is divisive in itself. Also, if Wolf hadn't asked that dumb-ass question and the woman hadn't answered honestly, this effort would never have been launched. Get a grip, people. THINK. Now, independent of religion, get about donating to the fund of your choice to help those devastated people.
Phillip McCleod
(1,837 posts)..soon as my new debit card is activated i'll go make a donation.
Cybergata
(1,465 posts). . . with my Get Out of Hell Free Card, plus I had to donate because of all the time I have been afraid to say I'm an Atheist in the past 40 years.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)http://thegospelcoalition.org/mobile/article/tgc/texas-atheist-flabbergasted-by-outpouring-of-christian-charity
7962
(11,841 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)"the opposite."
Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)Um, er, I mean how fortunate for her!